Relational Quantum Mechanics with Cross-Perspective Links Postulate: an Internally Inconsistent Scheme (2312.07056v2)
Abstract: We discuss the status of relative facts - the central concept of Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM) - in the context of the new amendment to RQM called cross-perspective links postulate. The new axiom states that by a proper measurement one learns the value of the relative outcome/fact earlier obtained by another observer-system. We discuss a Wigner-Friend-type scenario in which, without cross-perspective links postulate, relative facts have no predictive or causal power, whereas including cross-perspective links makes them effectively hidden variables, which causally determine outcomes of specific measurements. However, cross-perspective links axiom invalidates the other axiom of RQM, the one which states that in a Wigner-Friend scenario, RQM assigns an entangled state to the Friend and System after the unitary transformation of their interaction, despite the appearance of the relative fact for the Friend. This quantum mechanical state according to RQM properly describes the situation for Wigner. From this we show that RQM with cross-perspective links axiom is an internally inconsistent hidden variable theory and therefore cannot be treated as an interpretation of quantum mechanics in any sense.
- Adlam, Emily, and Carlo Rovelli (2022), “Information is physical: Cross-perspective links in relational quantum mechanics,” arXiv:2203.13342 [quant-ph] .
- Camilleri, Kristian, and Maximilian Schlosshauer (2015), “Niels Bohr as philosopher of experiment: Does decoherence theory challenge Bohr’s doctrine of classical concepts?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 49, 73–83.
- Cavalcanti, Eric G, Andrea Di Biagio, and Carlo Rovelli (2023), “On the consistency of relative facts,” arXiv:2305.07343 [quant-ph] .
- Deutsch, David (1985), “Quantum theory as a universal physical theory,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics 24 (1), 1–41.
- Fuchs, Christopher A, and Asher Peres (2000), “Quantum theory needs no ‘interpretation’,” Physics Today 53 (3), 70–71.
- Lawrence, Jay, Marcin Markiewicz, and Marek Żukowski (2023a), “Relative Facts of Relational Quantum Mechanics are Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics,” Quantum 7, 1015.
- Lawrence, Jay, Marcin Markiewicz, and Marek Żukowski (2023b), “Relational quantum mechanics is still incompatible with quantum mechanics,” arXiv:2310.18008 [quant-ph] .
- Rovelli, Carlo (2022), “The relational interpretation,” in Oxford Handbook of the History of Interpretation of Quantum Physics, edited by Olival Freire Jr et al. (Oxford University Press) pp. 1055–1072; also arXiv:2109.09170 [quant–ph].
- Schlosshauer, Maximilian A (2007), Decoherence: and the quantum-to-classical transition (Springer Science & Business Media).
- Wigner, Eugene Paul (1995), “Remarks on the mind-body question,” in Philosophical Reflections and Syntheses, edited by Jagdish Mehra (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg) pp. 247–260.
- Zanardi, P, and M. Rasetti (1997), “Noiseless quantum codes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3306–3309.
- Zanardi, Paolo (2001), “Virtual quantum subsystems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 077901.
- Żukowski, Marek, and Marcin Markiewicz (2021), “Physics and metaphysics of Wigner’s friends: Even performed premeasurements have no results,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 130402.
- Zurek, Wojciech H (2018), “Quantum reversibility is relative, or does a quantum measurement reset initial conditions?” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 376 (2123), 10.1098/rsta.2017.0315.
- Zurek, Wojciech Hubert (1982), “Environment-induced superselection rules,” Phys. Rev. D 26, 1862–1880.
- Zurek, Wojciech Hubert (2022), “Quantum theory of the classical: Einselection, envariance, quantum darwinism and extantons,” Entropy 24 (11), 1520.