Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Non-Cartesian Self-Supervised Physics-Driven Deep Learning Reconstruction for Highly-Accelerated Multi-Echo Spiral fMRI (2312.05707v1)

Published 9 Dec 2023 in eess.IV, cs.CV, cs.LG, eess.SP, and physics.med-ph

Abstract: Functional MRI (fMRI) is an important tool for non-invasive studies of brain function. Over the past decade, multi-echo fMRI methods that sample multiple echo times has become popular with potential to improve quantification. While these acquisitions are typically performed with Cartesian trajectories, non-Cartesian trajectories, in particular spiral acquisitions, hold promise for denser sampling of echo times. However, such acquisitions require very high acceleration rates for sufficient spatiotemporal resolutions. In this work, we propose to use a physics-driven deep learning (PD-DL) reconstruction to accelerate multi-echo spiral fMRI by 10-fold. We modify a self-supervised learning algorithm for optimized training with non-Cartesian trajectories and use it to train the PD-DL network. Results show that the proposed self-supervised PD-DL reconstruction achieves high spatio-temporal resolution with meaningful BOLD analysis.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. P. A. Bandettini, “What’s new in neuroimaging methods?,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1156, no. 1, pp. 260–293, 2009.
  2. “Pushing spatial and temporal resolution for functional and diffusion MRI in the human connectome project,” Neuroimage, vol. 80, pp. 80–104, 2013.
  3. S. Posse, “Multi-echo acquisition,” Neuroimage, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 665–671, 2012.
  4. “Differentiating BOLD and non-BOLD signals in fMRI time series using multi-echo EPI,” Neuroimage, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 1759–1770, 2012.
  5. G. H. Glover, “Spiral imaging in fMRI,” Neuroimage, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 706–712, Aug 2012.
  6. “Learning a variational network for reconstruction of accelerated MRI data,” Magn Reson Med, vol. 79, pp. 3055–3071, 2018.
  7. “MoDL: Model-based deep learning architecture for inverse problems,” IEEE Trans Med Imaging, vol. 38, pp. 394–405, 2019.
  8. “Dense recurrent neural networks for accelerated MRI: History-cognizant unrolling of optimization algorithms,” IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1280–1291, 2020.
  9. “Self-supervised learning of physics-guided reconstruction neural networks without fully-sampled reference data,” Magn Reson Med, vol. 84, pp. 3172–3191, 2020.
  10. “Multi-mask self-supervised learning for physics-guided neural networks in highly accelerated magnetic resonance imaging,” NMR in Biomedicine, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. e4798, 2022.
  11. S. Ramani and J. Fessler, “Parallel MR image reconstruction using augmented lagrangian methods,” IEEE Trans Med Imag, vol. 30, pp. 694–706, 08 2011.
  12. “Rapid compressed sensing reconstruction of 3D non-Cartesian MRI,” Magn Reson Med, vol. 79, 09 2017.
  13. J. A. Fessler, “Optimization methods for magnetic resonance image reconstruction,” IEEE Sig Proc Mag, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 2020.
  14. K. Gregor and Y. LeCun, “Learning fast approximations of sparse coding,” in Proc. ICML, 2010, pp. 399–406.
  15. “Deep-learning methods for parallel magnetic resonance imaging reconstruction,” IEEE Sig Proc Mag, vol. 37, pp. 128–140, 2020.
  16. “Unsupervised deep learning methods for biological image reconstruction and enhancement,” IEEE Sig Proc Mag, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 28–44, 2022.
  17. J. Pipe and P. Menon, “Sampling density compensation in mri: Rationale and an iterative numerical solution,” Magn Reson Med, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 179–186, 1999.
  18. J. Fessler and B. Sutton, “Nonuniform fast Fourier transforms using min-max interpolation,” IEEE Trans Sig Proc, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 560–574, 2003.
  19. “Distributed memory-efficient physics-guided deep learning reconstruction for large-scale 3D non-Cartesian MRI,” in Proc. ISBI, 2022.
  20. “Bold contrast sensitivity enhancement and artifact reduction with multiecho EPI: Parallel-acquired inhomogeneity-desensitized fMRI,” Magn Reson Med, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1227–1235, 2006.
  21. “Physics-driven deep learning for computational magnetic resonance imaging,” IEEE Sig Proc Mag, vol. 40, pp. 98–114, 2023.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.