Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
162 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Impact of Urban Street Geometry on the Detection Probability of Automotive Radars (2312.05623v1)

Published 9 Dec 2023 in cs.IT, eess.SP, and math.IT

Abstract: Prior works have analyzed the performance of millimeter wave automotive radars in the presence of diverse clutter and interference scenarios using stochastic geometry tools instead of more time-consuming measurement studies or system-level simulations. In these works, the distributions of radars or discrete clutter scatterers were modeled as Poisson point processes in the Euclidean space. However, since most automotive radars are likely to be mounted on vehicles and road infrastructure, road geometries are an important factor that must be considered. Instead of considering each road geometry as an individual case for study, in this work, we model each case as a specific instance of an underlying Poisson line process and further model the distribution of vehicles on the road as a Poisson point process - forming a Poisson line Cox process. Then, through the use of stochastic geometry tools, we estimate the average number of interfering radars for specific road and vehicular densities and the effect of radar parameters such as noise and beamwidth on the radar detection metrics. The numerical results are validated with Monte Carlo simulations.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (15)
  1. A. Al-Hourani, R. J. Evans, S. Kandeepan, B. Moran, and H. Eltom, “Stochastic geometry methods for modeling automotive radar interference,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 333–344, 2017.
  2. A. Munari, L. Simić, and M. Petrova, “Stochastic geometry interference analysis of radar network performance,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 2362–2365, 2018.
  3. P. Ren, A. Munari, and M. Petrova, “Performance tradeoffs of joint radar-communication networks,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 165–168, 2018.
  4. J. Park and R. W. Heath, “Analysis of blockage sensing by radars in random cellular networks,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1620–1624, 2018.
  5. Z. Fang, Z. Wei, X. Chen, H. Wu, and Z. Feng, “Stochastic geometry for automotive radar interference with rcs characteristics,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1817–1820, 2020.
  6. S. S. Ram, G. Singh, and G. Ghatak, “Estimating radar detection coverage probability of targets in a cluttered environment using stochastic geometry,” in 2020 IEEE International Radar Conference (RADAR), pp. 665–670, IEEE, 2020.
  7. S. S. Ram, G. Singh, and G. Ghatak, “Optimization of radar parameters for maximum detection probability under generalized discrete clutter conditions using stochastic geometry,” IEEE Open Journal of Signal Processing, vol. 2, pp. 571–585, 2021.
  8. S. S. Ram and G. Ghatak, “Estimation of bistatic radar detection performance under discrete clutter conditions using stochastic geometry,” in IEEE Radar Conference 2022, 2022.
  9. S. S. Ram, S. Singhal, and G. Ghatak, “Optimization of network throughput of joint radar communication system using stochastic geometry,” Frontiers in Signal Processing, vol. 2, p. 835743, 2022.
  10. S. Singhal, S. K. Biswas, and S. S. Ram, “Leo/meo-based multi-static passive radar detection performance analysis using stochastic geometry,” in 2023 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf23), pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2023.
  11. T. Schipper, S. Prophet, M. Harter, L. Zwirello, and T. Zwick, “Simulative prediction of the interference potential between radars in common road scenarios,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 322–328, 2015.
  12. G. Ghatak, S. S. Kalamkar, and Y. Gupta, “Radar detection in vehicular networks: Fine-grained analysis and optimal channel access,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 6671–6681, 2022.
  13. H. S. Dhillon and V. V. Chetlur, Poisson line Cox process: Foundations and applications to vehicular networks. Springer, 2020.
  14. D. Shnidman, “Expanded swerling target models,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1059–1069, 2003.
  15. M. Series, “Systems characteristics of automotive radars operating in the frequency band 76–81 ghz for intelligent transport. systems applications,” Recommendation ITU-R, M, pp. 2057–1, 2014.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.