Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
194 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Clearing Financial Networks with Derivatives: From Intractability to Algorithms (2312.05139v2)

Published 8 Dec 2023 in cs.CC, cs.CE, and cs.GT

Abstract: Financial networks raise a significant computational challenge in identifying insolvent firms and evaluating their exposure to systemic risk. This task, known as the clearing problem, is computationally tractable when dealing with simple debt contracts. However under the presence of certain derivatives called credit default swaps (CDSes) the clearing problem is $\textsf{FIXP}$-complete. Existing techniques only show $\textsf{PPAD}$-hardness for finding an $\epsilon$-solution for the clearing problem with CDSes within an unspecified small range for $\epsilon$. We present significant progress in both facets of the clearing problem: (i) intractability of approximate solutions; (ii) algorithms and heuristics for computable solutions. Leveraging $\textsf{Pure-Circuit}$ (FOCS'22), we provide the first explicit inapproximability bound for the clearing problem involving CDSes. Our primal contribution is a reduction from $\textsf{Pure-Circuit}$ which establishes that finding approximate solutions is $\textsf{PPAD}$-hard within a range of roughly 5%. To alleviate the complexity of the clearing problem, we identify two meaningful restrictions of the class of financial networks motivated by regulations: (i) the presence of a central clearing authority; and (ii) the restriction to covered CDSes. We provide the following results: (i.) The $\textsf{PPAD}$-hardness of approximation persists when central clearing authorities are introduced; (ii.) An optimisation-based method for solving the clearing problem with central clearing authorities; (iii.) A polynomial-time algorithm when the two restrictions hold simultaneously.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (33)
  1. Strong approximate consensus halving and the borsuk-ulam theorem. In ICALP, volume 198 of LIPIcs, pages 24:1–24:20. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2021.
  2. Strategic payments in financial networks. In 11th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2020). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2020.
  3. Settling the complexity of computing two-player nash equilibria. J. ACM, 56(3):14:1–14:57, 2009.
  4. Pure-circuit: Strong inapproximability for PPAD. In 63rd IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2022, Denver, CO, USA, October 31 - November 3, 2022, pages 159–170. IEEE, 2022.
  5. Tight inapproximability for graphical games. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 37, pages 5600–5607, 2023.
  6. The complexity of computing a nash equilibrium. Communications of the ACM, 52(2):89–97, 2009.
  7. Systemic risk in financial systems. Management Science, 47(2):236–249, 2001.
  8. Euro-parliament bans ’naked’ credit default swaps. EUBusiness. https://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/finance-economy-cds.dij.
  9. On the complexity of nash equilibria and other fixed points. SIAM Journal on Computing, 39(6):2531–2597, 2010.
  10. On the complexity of equilibrium computation in first-price auctions. SIAM J. Comput., 52(1):80–131, 2023.
  11. Fixp-membership via convex optimization: Games, cakes, and markets. In FOCS, pages 827–838. IEEE, 2021.
  12. Melvin Fitting. First-Order Logic and Automated Theorem Proving. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. Springer, 1990.
  13. The hairy ball problem is ppad-complete. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 122:34–62, 2021.
  14. Computational complexity of computing a quasi-proper equilibrium. In International Symposium on Fundamentals of Computation Theory, pages 259–271. Springer, 2021.
  15. Seniorities and minimal clearing in financial network games. In SAGT, volume 13584 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 187–204. Springer, 2022.
  16. Financial networks with singleton liability priorities. In International Symposium on Algorithmic Game Theory, pages 205–222. Springer, 2022.
  17. Strong approximations and irrationality in financial networks with derivatives. In 49th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2022). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2022.
  18. Financial networks with singleton liability priorities. Theor. Comput. Sci., 963:113965, 2023.
  19. Financial network games. In Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on AI in Finance, pages 1–9, 2021.
  20. Forgiving debt in financial network games. In AAMAS, pages 1651–1653. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (IFAAMAS), 2022.
  21. On total functions, existence theorems and computational complexity. Theor. Comput. Sci., 81(2):317–324, 1991.
  22. Christos H Papadimitriou. On the complexity of the parity argument and other inefficient proofs of existence. Journal of Computer and system Sciences, 48(3):498–532, 1994.
  23. Network-aware strategies in financial systems. In ICALP, volume 168 of LIPIcs, pages 91:1–91:17. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2020.
  24. Debt swapping for risk mitigation in financial networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 765–784, 2021.
  25. Sequential defaulting in financial networks. In ITCS, volume 185 of LIPIcs, pages 52:1–52:20. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2021.
  26. Default ambiguity: finding the best solution to the clearing problem. In Web and Internet Economics: 17th International Conference, WINE 2021, Potsdam, Germany, December 14–17, 2021, Proceedings, pages 391–409. Springer, 2022.
  27. Aviad Rubinstein. Inapproximability of nash equilibrium. In Proceedings of the forty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 409–418, 2015.
  28. Smoothed analysis of integer programming. Math. Program., 110(1):21–56, 2007.
  29. Failure and rescue in an interbank network. Management Science, 59(4):882–898, 2013.
  30. Portfolio compression in financial networks: Incentives and systemic risk. Available at SSRN 3135960, 2021.
  31. Clearing payments in financial networks with credit default swaps. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 759–759, 2016.
  32. Finding clearing payments in financial networks with credit default swaps is PPAD-complete. LIPIcs: Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, 67, 2017.
  33. Mihalis Yannakakis. Equilibria, fixed points, and complexity classes. Computer Science Review, 3(2):71–85, 2009.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.