The Potential Impact of AI Innovations on U.S. Occupations (2312.04714v5)
Abstract: An occupation is comprised of interconnected tasks, and it is these tasks, not occupations themselves, that are affected by AI. To evaluate how tasks may be impacted, previous approaches utilized manual annotations or coarse-grained matching. Leveraging recent advancements in machine learning, we replace coarse-grained matching with more precise deep learning approaches. Introducing the AI Impact (AII) measure, we employ Deep Learning Natural Language Processing to automatically identify AI patents that may impact various occupational tasks at scale. Our methodology relies on a comprehensive dataset of 17,879 task descriptions and quantifies AI's potential impact through analysis of 24,758 AI patents filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) between 2015 and 2022. Our results reveal that some occupations will potentially be impacted, and that impact is intricately linked to specific skills. These include not only routine tasks (codified as a series of steps), as previously thought, but also non-routine ones (e.g., diagnosing health conditions, programming computers, and tracking flight routes). However, AI's impact on labour is limited by the fact that some of the occupations affected are augmented rather than replaced (e.g., neurologists, software engineers, air traffic controllers), and the sectors affected are experiencing labour shortages (e.g., IT, Healthcare, Transport).
- “Predicting success in the worldwide start-up network” In Scientific reports 10.1 Nature, 2020, pp. 345
- Michael Webb “The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Labor Market” In SSRN Electronic Journal Elsevier BV, 2019 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3482150
- Erik Brynjolfsson, Tom Mitchell and Daniel Rock “What Can Machines Learn and What Does It Mean for Occupations and the Economy?” In AEA Papers and Proceedings 108 American Economic Association, 2018, pp. 43–47 DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20181019
- Edward Felten, Manav Raj and Robert Seamans “Occupational, industry, and geographic exposure to artificial intelligence: A novel dataset and its potential uses” In Strategic Management Journal 42.12 Wiley, 2021, pp. 2195–2217 DOI: 10.1002/smj.3286
- “Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability” In Technology in Society 67 Elsevier, 2021, pp. 101741
- “Artificial intelligence and jobs: evidence from online vacancies” In Journal of Labor Economics 40.S1 The University of Chicago Press, 2022, pp. S293–S340
- “Does Your Company Really Need a Chatbot?” In Harvard Business Review, 2019 URL: https://hbr.org/2019/05/does-your-company-really-need-a-chatbot
- “Generative AI and the future of work in America”, 2023 URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/our-research/generative-ai-and-the-future-of-work-in-america
- “AI and jobs: Evidence from online vacancies”, 2020
- Shanti Jagannathan, Sungsup Ra and Rupert Maclean “Dominant recent trends impacting on jobs and labor markets-An Overview” In International Journal of Training Research 17.sup1 Taylor & Francis, 2019, pp. 1–11
- Martin Ford “The rise of the robots: Technology and the threat of mass unemployment” In International Journal of HRD Practice Policy and Research 111, 2015
- Darrell M West “The future of work: Robots, AI, and automation” Brookings Institution Press, 2018
- Michael Chui “Artificial intelligence the next digital frontier” In McKinsey and Company Global Institute 47.3.6, 2017
- Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael A. Osborne “The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?” In Technological Forecasting and Social Change 114 Elsevier BV, 2017, pp. 254–280 DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
- Michael Bernard Coelli and Jeff Borland “Behind the headline number: Why not to rely on Frey and Osborne’s predictions of potential job loss from automation” Melbourne Institute Working Paper, 2019
- Ajay Agrawal, Joshua Gans and Avi Goldfarb “ChatGPT and How AI Disrupts Industries” In Harvard Business Review, 2022 URL: https://hbr.org/2022/12/chatgpt-and-how-ai-disrupts-industries
- “Automation and the workforce: A firm-level view from the 2019 Annual Business Survey”, 2022
- “Urban economic fitness and complexity from patent data” In Scientific Reports 13.1 Nature, 2023, pp. 3655
- Matteo Straccamore, Vittorio Loreto and Pietro Gravino “The geography of technological innovation dynamics” In Scientific Reports 13.1 Nature, 2023, pp. 21043
- “Constructing cities, deconstructing scaling laws” In Journal of the royal society interface 12.102 The Royal Society, 2015, pp. 20140745
- “What is the Future of Automation? Using Semantic Analysis to Identify Emerging Technologies” Pillars Report, 2023 URL: https://www.h2020-pillars.eu/node/1174
- “Labour-saving automation: a direct measure of occupational exposure” In World Economy, 2023
- “New Frontiers: The Origins and Content of New Work, 1940–2018”, 2022
- “Technology and Labor Displacement: Evidence from Linking Patents with Worker-Level Data”, 2023
- “Speech and Language Processing” Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2008
- “Sentence-T5: Scalable sentence encoders from pre-trained text-to-text models” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.08877, 2021
- Karen Levy “RoboTruckers: The Double Threat of AI for Low-Wage Work” In Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES’22), 2022
- Michael R Massoomi and Eileen M Handberg “Increasing and evolving role of smart devices in modern medicine” In European Cardiology Review 14.3 Radcliffe Cardiology, 2019, pp. 181
- “Smart watches: A review of evolution in bio-medical sector” In Materials Today: Proceedings 50 Elsevier, 2022, pp. 1053–1066
- “Deep learning for computational biology” In Molecular systems biology 12.7, 2016, pp. 878
- “AI-enabled business models in legal services: from traditional law firms to next-generation law companies?” In Journal of Professions and Organization 7.1 Oxford University Press, 2020, pp. 27–46
- Michael Batty “The emergence and evolution of urban AI” In AI & SOCIETY 38.3 Springer, 2023, pp. 1045–1048
- “Location strategies for agglomeration economies” In Strategic Management Journal 35.12 Wiley Online Library, 2014, pp. 1749–1761
- “Predicting urban innovation from the US Workforce Mobility Network” In Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8.1 Palgrave, 2021, pp. 1–9
- “Urbanization favors high wage earners” In Npj Urban Sustainability 2.1 Nature, 2022, pp. 6
- Richard G. Wilkinson and Kate Pickett “The Spirit Level. Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better” Allen Lane, 2009, pp. 331
- Alan Berube “City and metropolitan income inequality data reveal ups and downs through 2016”, 2018 URL: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/city-and-metropolitan-income-inequality-data-reveal-ups-and-downs-through-2016/
- Mallory Bateman “What does the Gini coefficient show us?”, 2020 URL: https://gardner.utah.edu/blog-what-does-the-gini-coefficient-show-us/
- Richard Florida “The rise of the creative class” Basic books New York, 2002
- Richard Florida “Cities and the creative class” Routledge, 2005
- “Understanding the Links between Diversity and Creativity as Assessed in the Boroughs of London” In Smart Cities 6.2 MDPI, 2023, pp. 1152–1166
- “It takes a village: A test of the creative class, social capital, and human capital theories” In Urban Affairs Review 44.3 Sage, 2009, pp. 311–333
- Richard Florida, Charlotta Mellander and Kevin Stolarick “Inside the black box of regional development—human capital, the creative class and tolerance” In Journal of economic geography 8.5 Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 615–649
- Lenore Shoults “Building Arkansas’ creative economy and quality of life” In Talk Business & Politics, 2021 URL: https://talkbusiness.net/2021/04/building-arkansas-creative-economy-and-quality-of-life/
- Joyce Elliott “Arkansas Legislative Arts and Technology Bootcamp”, 2021 URL: https://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/Acts/FTPDocument?path=%2FACTS%2F2021R%2FPublic%2F&file=577.pdf&ddBienniumSession=2021%2F2021R
- Sara Davies “Regional resilience in the 2008–2010 downturn: comparative evidence from European countries” In Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 4.3 Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 369–382
- Jean Christophe Dissart “Regional economic diversity and regional economic stability: research results and agenda” In International Regional Science Review 26.4 Sage Publications, 2003, pp. 423–446
- Karen Chapple and T William Lester “The resilient regional labour market? The US case” In Cambridge journal of regions, economy and society 3.1 Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 85–104
- Ron Martin “Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks” In Journal of economic geography 12.1 Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 1–32
- Michael Chui, James Manyika and Mehdi Miremadi “Where machines could replace humans—and where they can’t (yet)”, 2016 URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/where-machines-could-replace-humans-and-where-they-cant-yet
- Erik Brynjolfsson “The turing trap: The promise & peril of human-like artificial intelligence” In Daedalus 151.2 MIT Press, 2022, pp. 272–287
- Ajay Agrawal, Joshua S Gans and Avi Goldfarb “Do we want less automation?” In Science 381.6654 American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2023, pp. 155–158
- “Intelligence augmentation: Human factors in AI and future of work” In AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 14.3, 2022, pp. 426–445
- “Breaking Out of the Ivory Tower: A Large-scale Analysis of Patent Citations to HCI Research” In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2023, pp. 1–24
- Knut Blind, Katrin Cremers and Elisabeth Mueller “The influence of strategic patenting on companies’ patent portfolios” In Research Policy 38.2 Elsevier, 2009, pp. 428–436
- Florian Jell, Joachim Henkel and Martin W Wallin “Offensive patent portfolio races” In Long Range Planning 50.5 Elsevier, 2017, pp. 531–549
- Wesley Cohen, Richard Nelson and John Walsh “Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not)”, 2000 DOI: 10.3386/w7552
- Anthony Arundel “The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation” In Research policy 30.4 Elsevier, 2001, pp. 611–624
- Haque, Farzana “Patents: Which Sectors Have the Most?” Beauhurst, 2023 URL: https://www.beauhurst.com/blog/sectors-vs-patents/
- O*NET Resource Center, National Center for O*NET Development “O*NET® Database Releases Archive”, 2023 URL: https://www.onetcenter.org/db_releases.html
- Maarten Goos, Alan Manning and Anna Salomons “Job Polarization in Europe” In American Economic Review 99.2 American Economic Association, 2009, pp. 58–63 DOI: 10.1257/aer.99.2.58
- David H. Autor and Michael J. Handel “Putting Tasks to the Test: Human Capital, Job Tasks, and Wages” In Journal of Labor Economics 31.S1 University of Chicago Press, 2013, pp. S59–S96 DOI: 10.1086/669332
- Edward W. Felten, Manav Raj and Robert Seamans “How will Language Modelers like ChatGPT Affect Occupations and Industries?” In SSRN Electronic Journal Elsevier BV, 2023 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4375268
- WIPO “WIPO Technology Trends 2019: Artificial Intelligence” Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization, 2019 URL: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_1055.pdf
- “Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks” In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) Hong Kong, China: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019, pp. 3982–3992 DOI: 10.18653/v1/D19-1410
- Johnny Saldaña “The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers” Sage, 2015
- “Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook” Sage, 1994
- “Using thematic analysis in psychology” In Qualitative research in psychology 3.2 Taylor & Francis, 2006, pp. 77–101
- Ali Akbar Septiandri (12 papers)
- Marios Constantinides (35 papers)
- Daniele Quercia (77 papers)