Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
72 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
61 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
8 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Towards a Psychological Generalist AI: A Survey of Current Applications of Large Language Models and Future Prospects (2312.04578v1)

Published 1 Dec 2023 in cs.AI, cs.CL, and cs.LG
Towards a Psychological Generalist AI: A Survey of Current Applications of Large Language Models and Future Prospects

Abstract: The complexity of psychological principles underscore a significant societal challenge, given the vast social implications of psychological problems. Bridging the gap between understanding these principles and their actual clinical and real-world applications demands rigorous exploration and adept implementation. In recent times, the swift advancement of highly adaptive and reusable AI models has emerged as a promising way to unlock unprecedented capabilities in the realm of psychology. This paper emphasizes the importance of performance validation for these large-scale AI models, emphasizing the need to offer a comprehensive assessment of their verification from diverse perspectives. Moreover, we review the cutting-edge advancements and practical implementations of these expansive models in psychology, highlighting pivotal work spanning areas such as social media analytics, clinical nursing insights, vigilant community monitoring, and the nuanced exploration of psychological theories. Based on our review, we project an acceleration in the progress of psychological fields, driven by these large-scale AI models. These future generalist AI models harbor the potential to substantially curtail labor costs and alleviate social stress. However, this forward momentum will not be without its set of challenges, especially when considering the paradigm changes and upgrades required for medical instrumentation and related applications.

Introduction

Understanding and addressing mental health conditions is a critical societal issue that affects individuals globally. Despite growing recognition of mental health's importance, there remain significant challenges in providing adequate care and support. This is where AI, particularly LLMs like GPT, comes into play. These models, with their extensive pre-training on diverse datasets, offer the potential to transform the field of psychology. By guiding individuals through their emotional states, enhancing social media analytics for mental health insights, and supporting clinical decision-making, AI is on the brink of reshaping psychological practices and theory.

Potential of Generalist AI in Psychology

The promise of Generalist Psychology AI (GPAI) is vast, with the capacity to handle complex tasks traditionally addressed by human experts. The flexibility of GPAI allows for nuanced monitoring of mental health, integration of diverse data modes, and advanced reasoning with predictive capabilities. For instance, in clinical settings, GPAI could aid in patient intake by evaluating psychological states and suggesting treatment actions. In communities, AI could direct mental health awareness campaigns or detect early signs of psychological distress. Online, AI might monitor posts for detection of distress, offering resources or alerting support networks. As we navigate the ever-growing digital landscape, GPAI's potential to offer real-time, ethical, and non-judgmental interactions could be pivotal in improving psychological well-being on a global scale.

Challenges and Evaluation of LLMs

Despite the optimism surrounding LLMs in psychology, it's crucial to assess their performance rigorously. Studies have used task-specific evaluations to discern how well LLMs understand emotional awareness, recognize emotions, and classify mental health conditions such as depression or suicidality. Although advances like GPT-3.5 have shown remarkable performance improvements, consistent and unbiased evaluation is key. The essence of model evaluation extends beyond clinical applications to understanding how LLMs process social interactions and simulate real-world scenarios. By thoroughly evaluating these models across varied psychological contexts, we can better harness their potential while acknowledging their limitations.

Applications and Progress of LLMs in Psychology

The applications of LLMs span across digital media, clinical settings, and community endeavours. They've been used to enhance digital platforms for sentiment detection, and construct intelligent chatbots that provide empathy and support. Clinically, they assist in psychological counseling and patient care. Communities benefit from the detection and intervention tools AI provides for mental health screenings, especially for vulnerable populations like children and adolescents. Academic institutions utilize AI to foster student well-being, while on social media, AI can offer tools for positivity and detect online harassment. The progress in applying LLMs is not without challenges, yet the innovative explorations in this field are paving the way for more responsive and efficient psychological services.

Looking Forward

As the development of generalist AI in psychology marches on, it is imperative to consider ethical implications and privacy concerns. The transition to using open-source, pre-trained models offers a cost-effective way to adapt advanced AI tools for specific needs. However, it is crucial to ensure multi-domain validation, navigate ethical complexities, and safeguard user privacy. By addressing these practical issues with vigor, AI can become an invaluable ally in improving mental health worldwide. The conclusion, therefore, is not an end but the beginning of a journey towards a reality where generalist AI plays an integral role in augmenting psychological well-being and treatment.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (11)
  1. Tianyu He (51 papers)
  2. Guanghui Fu (22 papers)
  3. Yijing Yu (1 paper)
  4. Fan Wang (312 papers)
  5. Jianqiang Li (50 papers)
  6. Qing Zhao (181 papers)
  7. Changwei Song (12 papers)
  8. Hongzhi Qi (6 papers)
  9. Dan Luo (25 papers)
  10. Huijing Zou (2 papers)
  11. Bing Xiang Yang (8 papers)
Citations (9)