Simulating the Air Quality Impact of Prescribed Fires Using Graph Neural Network-Based PM$_{2.5}$ Forecasts (2312.04291v2)
Abstract: The increasing size and severity of wildfires across the western United States have generated dangerous levels of PM${2.5}$ concentrations in recent years. In a changing climate, expanding the use of prescribed fires is widely considered to be the most robust fire mitigation strategy. However, reliably forecasting the potential air quality impact from prescribed fires, which is critical in planning the prescribed fires' location and time, at hourly to daily time scales remains a challenging problem. In this paper, we introduce a spatial-temporal graph neural network (GNN) based forecasting model for hourly PM${2.5}$ predictions across California. Using a two-step approach, we leverage our forecasting model to estimate the PM${2.5}$ contribution of wildfires. Integrating the GNN-based PM${2.5}$ forecasting model with prescribed fire simulations, we propose a novel framework to forecast the PM$_{2.5}$ pollution of prescribed fires. This framework helps determine March as the optimal month for implementing prescribed fires in California and quantifies the potential air quality trade-offs involved in conducting more prescribed fires outside the fire season.
- M. Burke, A. Driscoll, S. Heft-Neal, J. Xue, J. Burney, and M. Wara, “The changing risk and burden of wildfire in the United States,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118, no. 2, 2021.
- World Health Organization, “Ambient (outdoor) air pollution,” 2022.
- M. Burke, M. Childs, B. de la Cuesta, et al., “The contribution of wildfire to PM2.52.5{}_{2.5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2.5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT trends in the USA,” Nature, 2023.
- M. M. Kelp, M. C. Carroll, T. Liu, R. M. Yantosca, H. E. Hockenberry, and L. J. Mickley, “Prescribed burns as a tool to mitigate future wildfire smoke exposure: Lessons for states and rural environmental justice communities,” Earth’s Future, vol. 11, no. 6, 2023.
- S. M. McCaffrey, “Prescribed fire: What influences public approval,” in Fire in eastern oak forests: delivering science to land managers, proceedings of a conference (M. B. Dickinson, ed.), (Columbus, OH), pp. 192–198, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 2006. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-1. Newtown Square, PA.
- Elsevier, 2020.
- D. Byun and K. L. Schere, “Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms and other components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system,” Applied Mechanics Reviews, vol. 59, p. 51–76, 2006.
- N. Zaini, L. W. Ean, A. N. Ahmed, M. Abdul Malek, and M. F. Chow, “PM2.52.5{}_{2.5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2.5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT forecasting for an urban area based on deep learning and decomposition method,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, no. 1, 2022.
- Y. Rybarczyk and R. Zalakeviciute, “Machine learning approaches for outdoor air quality modelling: A systematic review,” Applied Sciences, 2018.
- L. Li, J. Wang, M. Franklin, et al., “Improving air quality assessment using physics-inspired deep graph learning,” npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, vol. 6, p. 152, 2023.
- S. Wang, Y. Li, J. Zhang, Q. Meng, L. Meng, and F. Gao, “PM2.52.5{}_{2.5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2.5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT-GNN: A domain knowledge enhanced graph neural network for PM2.52.5{}_{2.5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2.5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT forecasting,” in Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, 2020.
- California Air Resources Board, “Air quality and meteorological information system.” https://www.arb.ca.gov/aqmis2/aqmis2.php, 2023. Accessed June 7, 2023.
- US Environmental Protection Agency, “Air quality system data mart.” https://www.epa.gov/outdoor-air-quality-data, 2023. Accessed June 7, 2023.
- H. Hersbach, B. Bell, P. Berrisford, et al., “The ERA5 global reanalysis,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 146, pp. 1999–2049, 2020.
- W. Schroeder, P. Oliva, L. Giglio, and I. A. Csiszar, “The new VIIRS 375 m active fire detection data product: Algorithm description and initial assessment,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 143, pp. 85–96, 2014.
- D. J. Stekhoven and P. Bühlmann, “Missforest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data,” Bioinformatics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 112–118, 2011.
- CalFire, “Prescribed burns.” https://data.ca.gov/dataset/prescribed-burns, 2023. Accessed June 20, 2023.