Attaining Equilibria Using Control Sets (2312.03229v1)
Abstract: Many interactions result in a socially suboptimal equilibrium, or in a non-equilibrium state, from which arriving at an equilibrium through simple dynamics can be impossible of too long. Aiming to achieve a certain equilibrium, we persuade, bribe, or coerce a group of participants to make them act in a way that will motivate the rest of the players to act accordingly to the desired equilibrium. Formally, we ask which subset of the players can adopt the goal equilibrium strategies that will make acting according to the desired equilibrium a best response for the other players. We call such a subset a direct control set, prove some connections to strength of equilibrium, and study the hardness to find such lightest sets, even approximately. We then solve important subcases and provide approximation algorithms, assuming monotonicity. Next, we concentrate on potential games and prove that, while the problem of finding such a set is \NP-hard, even for constant-factor approximation, we can still solve the problem approximately or even precisely in relevant special cases. We approximately solve this problem for singleton potential games and treat more closely specific potential games, such as symmetric games and coordination games on graphs.
- John Nash. Non-Cooperative Games. The Annals of Mathematics, 54(2):286–295, September 1951.
- Manipulating games by sharing information. Studia Logica: An International Journal for Symbolic Logic, 102(2):267–295, 2014.
- Designing incentives for boolean games. In The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1, AAMAS ’11, pages 79–86, Richland, SC, 2011. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
- Approximate equilibrium and incentivizing social coordination. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 28(1), Jun. 2014.
- Fair, individually rational and cheap adjustment. In Lud De Raedt, editor, Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-22, pages 447–453. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 7 2022. Main Track.
- Coordination games on graphs. International Journal of Game Theory, 46(3):851–877, August 2017.
- Computing correlated equilibria in multi-player games. J. ACM, 55(3), aug 2008.
- R. Bar-Yehuda and S. Moran. On approximation problems related to the independent set and vertex cover problems. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 9(1):1–10, 1984.
- Algorithmic Game Theory. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2007.
- Matthew O. Jackson. A crash course in implementation theory. Social Choice and Welfare, 18(4):655–708, 2001.
- K-implementation. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR), 21:37–62, 01 2004.
- T.C. Schelling. The Strategy of Conflict: With a New Preface by the Author. Harvard University Press, 1980.
- Ehud Kalai. Viable nash equilibria: Formation and defection (feb 2020), 02 2020.
- Beyond dominance and nash: Ranking equilibria by critical mass, 06 2023.
- Distributed computing meets game theory: Robust mechanisms for rational secret sharing and multiparty computation. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC ’06, page 53–62, New York, NY, USA, 2006. Association for Computing Machinery.
- Viable nash equilibria: An experiment. 2022.
- Completeness theorems for non-cryptographic fault-tolerant distributed computation. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’88, page 1–10, New York, NY, USA, 1988. Association for Computing Machinery.
- Kfir Eliaz. Fault tolerant implementation. The Review of Economic Studies, 69(3):589–610, 2002.
- Mihalis Yannakakis. The effect of a connectivity requirement on the complexity of maximum subgraph problems. J. ACM, 26:618–630, 10 1979.
- Graphical models for game theory. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference in Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI ’01, pages 253–260, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2001. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
- Richard M. Karp. Reducibility among Combinatorial Problems, pages 85–103. Springer US, Boston, MA, 1972.
- David S. Johnson. Approximation algorithms for combinatorial problems. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 9(3):256–278, 1974.
- On the minimum hitting set of bundles problem. Theoretical Computer Science, 410(45):4534–4542, 2009. Algorithmic Aspects in Information and Management.
- Peter Damaschke. Parameterizations of hitting set of bundles and inverse scope. J. Comb. Optim., 29(4):847–858, 2015.
- R. Bar-Yehuda and S. Even. A local-ratio theorem for approximating the weighted vertex cover problem. North-Holland Mathematics Studies, 109:27 – 45, 1985.
- A unified approach to approximating resource allocation and scheduling. Journal of the ACM, 48(5):1069–1090, 2001.
- Local ratio: A unified framework for approximation algorithms. in memoriam: Shimon even 1935-2004. ACM Comput. Surv., 36(4):422–463, December 2004.
- Potential games. Games and Economic Behavior, 14(1):124 – 143, 1996.
- Fault-tolerant clustering in ad hoc and sensor networks. In 26th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS’06), pages 68–68, 2006.
- Strong mediated equilibrium. Artificial Intelligence, 173(1):180–195, 2009.