Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
194 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Q-learning approach to the continuous control problem of robot inverted pendulum balancing (2312.02649v1)

Published 5 Dec 2023 in cs.RO and cs.LG

Abstract: This study evaluates the application of a discrete action space reinforcement learning method (Q-learning) to the continuous control problem of robot inverted pendulum balancing. To speed up the learning process and to overcome technical difficulties related to the direct learning on the real robotic system, the learning phase is performed in simulation environment. A mathematical model of the system dynamics is implemented, deduced by curve fitting on data acquired from the real system. The proposed approach demonstrated feasible, featuring its application on a real world robot that learned to balance an inverted pendulum. This study also reinforces and demonstrates the importance of an accurate representation of the physical world in simulation to achieve a more efficient implementation of reinforcement learning algorithms in real world, even when using a discrete action space algorithm to control a continuous action.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. Learning robust manipulation skills with guided policy search via generative motor reflexes. In 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 7851–7857). doi:10.1109/ICRA.2019.8793775.
  2. Q-learning in continuous state and action spaces. In Australasian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 417–428). Springer.
  3. Deep reinforcement learning for robotic manipulation with asynchronous off-policy updates. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 3389–3396). doi:10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989385.
  4. Continuous deep q-learning with model-based acceleration. In International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 2829–2838). PMLR.
  5. Q-learning algorithms: A comprehensive classification and applications. IEEE Access, 7, 133653–133667. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2941229.
  6. Self-supervised sim-to-real adaptation for visual robotic manipulation. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 2718–2724). IEEE.
  7. Transferring policy of deep reinforcement learning from simulation to reality for robotics. Nature Machine Intelligence, 4, 1077–1087. doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00573-6.
  8. Reinforced grounded action transformation for sim-to-real transfer. In 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (pp. 4397–4402). doi:10.1109/IROS45743.2020.9341149.
  9. Autonomous helicopter flight via reinforcement learning. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 799–806).
  10. Reinforcement learning in robotics: A survey. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 32, 1238–1274. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364913495721. doi:10.1177/0278364913495721. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364913495721.
  11. Learning contact-rich manipulation skills with guided policy search. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 156--163). doi:10.1109/ICRA.2015.7138994.
  12. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518, 529--533.
  13. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. nature, 518, 529--533.
  14. Overcoming exploration in reinforcement learning with demonstrations. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 6292--6299). doi:10.1109/ICRA.2018.8463162.
  15. Deep reinforcement learning applied to an assembly sequence planning problem with user preferences. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 122, 4235–4245. doi:10.1007/s00170-022-09877-8.
  16. Ridm: Reinforced inverse dynamics modeling for learning from a single observed demonstration. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 5, 6262--6269.
  17. Position/force control of robot manipulators using reinforcement learning. Industrial Robot, 46, 267--280.
  18. A framework for learning from demonstration with minimal human effort. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 5, 2023--2030. doi:10.1109/LRA.2020.2970619.
  19. V-rep: A versatile and scalable robot simulation framework. In 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (pp. 1321--1326). IEEE.
  20. Caql: Continuous action q-learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.12397, .
  21. A neuro swarm procedure to solve the novel second order perturbed delay lane-emden model arising in astrophysics. Scientific Reports, 12. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-26566-4.
  22. Kuka sunrise toolbox: Interfacing collaborative robots with matlab. IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine, 26, 91--96.
  23. Deep reinforcement learning-based attitude motion control for humanoid robots with stability constraints. Industrial Robot, 47, 335--347. doi:10.1108/IR-11-2019-0240.
  24. Siciliano, B. (1990). A closed-loop inverse kinematic scheme for on-line joint-based robot control. Robotica, 8, 231--243.
  25. Reinforcement learning: An introduction. MIT press.
  26. Stochastic policy gradient reinforcement learning on a simple 3d biped. In 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)(IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37566) (pp. 2849--2854). IEEE volume 3.
  27. Search algorithm of the assembly sequence of products by using past learning results. International Journal of Production Economics, 226, 107615. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527320300037. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107615.
  28. Q-learning. Machine learning, 8, 279--292.
  29. Probability dueling dqn active visual slam for autonomous navigation in indoor environment. Industrial Robot, . doi:10.1108/IR-08-2020-0160.
  30. Sim-to-real transfer of accurate grasping with eye-in-hand observations and continuous control, .
  31. Sim-to-real transfer in deep reinforcement learning for robotics: a survey. In 2020 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) (pp. 737--744). IEEE.
Citations (5)

Summary

  • The paper proposes applying discrete-action Q-learning to tackle the continuous control challenge of robot inverted pendulum balancing.
  • It details a methodology that combines simulation, curve fitting, and state discretization for effective sim-to-real policy transfer.
  • Experimental results show successful balancing for about five seconds, underlining both the method's potential and existing limitations for real-world applications.

A Q-learning Approach to the Continuous Control Problem of Robot Inverted Pendulum Balancing

The paper "A Q-learning approach to the continuous control problem of robot inverted pendulum balancing" by Mohammad Safeea and Pedro Neto offers an evaluation of applying discrete-action reinforcement learning (specifically Q-learning) to a challenging continuous control problem: the balancing of an inverted pendulum using a robotic manipulator.

Introduction

The authors introduce the application of reinforcement learning (RL) in robotics, emphasizing its potential to enable autonomous learning in unstructured environments. The paper addresses the complexities involved in using RL for continuous control tasks, particularly the inverted pendulum problem. The paper places this work in context by citing key studies and methodologies in RL, highlighting the unique challenges of environment exploration with sparse rewards and the use of simulated environments to train RL policies.

Methodologies

The authors propose a methodology that relies on training the Q-learning policy in a simulated environment before transferring the learned policy to a real robotic system. The simulation is conducted using the Virtual Robot Experimentation Platform (V-REP, CoppeliaSim), and the learned policy is then applied to a real robotic manipulator tasked with balancing an inverted pendulum.

Mathematical Model and System Identification

The system's dynamics are initially modeled mathematically using data acquired from the real-world system. A curve fitting approach is used to derive accurate parameter estimates, ensuring the simulation closely mirrors the actual physical system. This step is crucial for reducing discrepancies between the simulated and real environments, thereby increasing the likelihood of successful policy transfer.

Acceleration Control

The commanded accelerations required to perform the balancing act are tracked using a Closed Loop Inverse Kinematics (CLIK) algorithm. This algorithm, anchored in differential kinematics, ensures that the robot's joints move in a manner that tracks the desired accelerations of the end-effector, which ultimately controls the pendulum.

Implementation

Discretization

Critical to this approach is the discretization of state spaces and action spaces. The authors discretize the control commands, pendulum angular positions and velocities, as well as the robot flange's position and velocity into specific intervals, thus converting a continuous control problem into a discrete one suitable for Q-learning.

Simulation

The Q-learning algorithm undergoes extensive training in the simulated environment. The training process involves 10,000 episodes, with noise injected into the system's parameters to account for uncertainties and enhance robustness.

Results

Upon completing the simulated training, the learned policy is deployed to the real robotic system. The results show that the robot successfully balances the pendulum for approximately five seconds before failure due to cumulative errors and perturbations in the real system.

Discussion and Implications

The paper demonstrates the feasibility of using a discrete action RL approach for continuous control tasks when supported by accurate simulations. The advantages of this methodology include significant reductions in training time and risks associated with hardware damage, as well as the control flexibility afforded by starting simulations from various initial states.

However, the authors acknowledge the challenges associated with discrepancies between simulated models and real-world conditions. Even with a robust simulation, unmodeled dynamics and perturbations can undermine performance. Thus, future work is geared towards refining the control policy with more real-world data to further bridge the sim-to-real gap.

Conclusion

This research underscores the potential of combining Q-learning with a carefully modeled simulation environment to address continuous control problems in robotics. Although there are inherent difficulties in directly transferring learned policies from simulation to real-world conditions, this paper presents a promising approach that leverages the strengths of RL while proposing future improvements to mitigate its current limitations.

Overall, this paper provides a methodologically sound and practically relevant exploration of the applicability of Q-learning to continuous control problems, contributing valuable insights to the field of robotic control and RL.