Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Foundations for Transfer in Reinforcement Learning: A Taxonomy of Knowledge Modalities (2312.01939v1)

Published 4 Dec 2023 in cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.RO, and stat.ML

Abstract: Contemporary artificial intelligence systems exhibit rapidly growing abilities accompanied by the growth of required resources, expansive datasets and corresponding investments into computing infrastructure. Although earlier successes predominantly focus on constrained settings, recent strides in fundamental research and applications aspire to create increasingly general systems. This evolving landscape presents a dual panorama of opportunities and challenges in refining the generalisation and transfer of knowledge - the extraction from existing sources and adaptation as a comprehensive foundation for tackling new problems. Within the domain of reinforcement learning (RL), the representation of knowledge manifests through various modalities, including dynamics and reward models, value functions, policies, and the original data. This taxonomy systematically targets these modalities and frames its discussion based on their inherent properties and alignment with different objectives and mechanisms for transfer. Where possible, we aim to provide coarse guidance delineating approaches which address requirements such as limiting environment interactions, maximising computational efficiency, and enhancing generalisation across varying axes of change. Finally, we analyse reasons contributing to the prevalence or scarcity of specific forms of transfer, the inherent potential behind pushing these frontiers, and underscore the significance of transitioning from designed to learned transfer.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Markus Wulfmeier (46 papers)
  2. Arunkumar Byravan (27 papers)
  3. Sarah Bechtle (13 papers)
  4. Karol Hausman (56 papers)
  5. Nicolas Heess (139 papers)
Citations (3)

Summary

The Taxonomy of Knowledge Modalities in Reinforcement Learning

Introduction to the Taxonomy

Reinforcement learning (RL) is an area of artificial intelligence that involves learning optimal behaviors through interactions with an environment to achieve certain goals. As RL expands to tackle more complex and general problems, efficient and effective transfer of knowledge gained from one setting to another has become increasingly important. Simply put, the goal is to leverage what an RL agent has learned from previous experiences (the source) to improve its performance on new, related tasks (the target).

Different Forms of Transferable Knowledge

The types of information that can be transferred in RL fall into several categories:

  • Dynamics Models: These models capture how an environment changes in response to actions. They can be used in model-based planning approaches, such as model-predictive control (MPC), to predict future states and make decisions.
  • Reward Models: Rewards specify the objectives within an RL problem. Transferable reward models are beneficial when target rewards are difficult to define manually or need to be inferred from data.
  • Value Functions: These functions estimate the future rewards an agent can expect to receive from particular states or state-action pairs. They encompass information about system dynamics, agent behavior, and objectives, thus making them intricate to use in transfer settings.
  • Policies: Policies are explicit mappings from states to actions, representing the agent's behavior. Given their direct impact on actions, they are generally the easiest to use for generating behavior but may require adaptation when there are significant changes in the dynamics or tasks.

Mechanisms for Transfer

Transfer methods can be direct (transfer and use the pre-trained models as-is) or indirect (use the pre-trained models to influence the learning of a new model).

  • Direct Methods: These include fine-tuning (continue training a pre-trained model on the target task), representation transfer (reuse learned representations with additional training), and meta learning (optimize a model's ability to quickly adapt to new tasks).
  • Indirect Methods: These involve leveraging data or using auxiliary objectives. For example, data collected under a policy learned in the source environment can guide exploration in the target environment.

Evaluating Transfer

Evaluating transfer can be multifaceted. It involves measuring not just the initial performance in the target domain but also how much additional experience is needed to reach a particular performance level, as well as the asymptotic performance after further training.

The Role of Data

While raw data underpins all other types of knowledge transfer, it usually requires more processing to be useful for behavior generation. Data transfer, that said, remains particularly relevant in domains without strict requirements on the speed of learning.

Comparative Analysis and Future Opportunities

General trends show a shift towards dynamics and reward models due to their potential for high generalization accuracy. However, RL faces challenges in standardizing benchmarks and evaluation protocols. The future of transfer learning in RL is likely to be shaped by larger and more diverse pre-training distributions, embodied in concepts like foundation models, and aided by trends such as modularity in learning, meta learning for adaptability, and leveraging large data sources.

Conclusion

The landscape of transfer learning in RL is rapidly evolving. By understanding how different knowledge modalities can be reused and adapted effectively, RL can move closer to achieving more general and scalable solutions across diverse tasks and environments.