Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
133 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

RNN-BOF: A Multivariate Global Recurrent Neural Network for Binary Outcome Forecasting of Inpatient Aggression (2312.01029v1)

Published 2 Dec 2023 in cs.LG

Abstract: Psychometric assessment instruments aid clinicians by providing methods of assessing the future risk of adverse events such as aggression. Existing machine learning approaches have treated this as a classification problem, predicting the probability of an adverse event in a fixed future time period from the scores produced by both psychometric instruments and clinical and demographic covariates. We instead propose modelling a patient's future risk using a time series methodology that learns from longitudinal data and produces a probabilistic binary forecast that indicates the presence of the adverse event in the next time period. Based on the recent success of Deep Neural Nets for globally forecasting across many time series, we introduce a global multivariate Recurrent Neural Network for Binary Outcome Forecasting, that trains from and for a population of patient time series to produce individual probabilistic risk assessments. We use a moving window training scheme on a real world dataset of 83 patients, where the main binary time series represents the presence of aggressive events and covariate time series represent clinical or demographic features and psychometric measures. On this dataset our approach was capable of a significant performance increase against both benchmark psychometric instruments and previously used machine learning methodologies.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. J. Ogloff and M. Daffern, “The dynamic appraisal of situational aggression: An instrument to assess risk for imminent aggression in psychiatric inpatients,” Behavioral sciences & the law, vol. 24, pp. 799–813, 2006.
  2. C. D. Webster, T. L. Nicholls, M.-L. Martin, S. L. Desmarais, and J. Brink, “Short-term assessment of risk and treatability (start): the case for a new structured professional judgment scheme,” Behavioral sciences & the law, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 747–766, 2006.
  3. I. R. Galatzer-Levy, K.-I. Karstoft, A. Statnikov, and A. Y. Shalev, “Quantitative forecasting of ptsd from early trauma responses: A machine learning application,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 59, pp. 68–76, 2014.
  4. N. Parghi, L. Chennapragada, S. Barzilay, S. Newkirk, B. Ahmedani, B. Lok, and I. Galynker, “Assessing the predictive ability of the suicide crisis inventory for near-term suicidal behavior using machine learning approaches,” International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, vol. 30, p. e1863, 2021.
  5. G. Orrù, M. Monaro, C. Conversano, A. Gemignani, and G. Sartori, “Machine learning in psychometrics and psychological research,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 10, p. 2970, 2020.
  6. P. Montero-Manso and R. J. Hyndman, “Principles and algorithms for forecasting groups of time series: Locality and globality,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1632–1653, 2021.
  7. R. Sen, H.-F. Yu, and I. Dhillon, “Think globally, act locally: A deep neural network approach to high-dimensional time series forecasting,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. d’Alché Buc, E. Fox, and R. Garnett, Eds., vol. 32.   Curran Associates, Inc., 2019.
  8. Z. Li, J. He, H. Liu, and X. Du, “Combining global and sequential patterns for multivariate time series forecasting,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, 2020, pp. 180–187.
  9. K. Bandara, P. Shi, C. Bergmeir, H. Hewamalage, Q. Tran, and B. Seaman, “Sales demand forecast in e-commerce using a long short-term memory neural network methodology,” in Neural Information Processing, T. Gedeon, K. W. Wong, and M. Lee, Eds., vol. 1142.   Cham: Springer, 2019, pp. 462–474.
  10. P. Flach and M. Kull, “Precision-recall-gain curves: Pr analysis done right,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, C. Cortes, N. Lawrence, D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, and R. Garnett, Eds., vol. 28.   Curran Associates, Inc., 2015.
  11. S. Makridakis, E. Spiliotis, and V. Assimakopoulos, “The m4 competition: Results, findings, conclusion and way forward,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 802–808, 2018.
  12. S. Smyl, “A hybrid method of exponential smoothing and recurrent neural networks for time series forecasting,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 75–85, 2020.
  13. H. Hewamalage, C. Bergmeir, and K. Bandara, “Global Models for Time Series Forecasting: A Simulation Study,” arXiv, 2020.
  14. H. Hewamalage, C. Bergmeir, and K. Bandara, “Recurrent neural networks for time series forecasting: Current status and future directions,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 37, pp. 388–427, 2021.
  15. E. Bautu, S. Kim, A. Bautu, H. Luchian, and B.-T. Zhang, “Evolving hypernetwork models of binary time series for forecasting price movements on stock markets,” IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 11, pp. 166–173, 2009.
  16. C. Jentsch and L. Reichmann, “Generalized binary time series models,” Econometrics, vol. 7, p. 47, 2019.
  17. W. T. M. Dunsmuir and D. J. Scott, “The glarma package for observation-driven time series regression of counts,” Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 67, no. 7, p. 1–36, 2015.
  18. A. M. Aguilera, M. Escabias, and M. J. Valderrama, “Forecasting binary longitudinal data by a functional pc-arima model,” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 3187–3197, 2008.
  19. R. Likert, “A technique for the measurement of attitudes,” Archives of psychology, vol. 22, no. 140, pp. 5–55, 1933.
  20. K. Bandara, C. Bergmeir, and S. Smyl, “Forecasting across time series databases using recurrent neural networks on groups of similar series: A clustering approach,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 140, p. 112896, 2020.
  21. N. Srivastava, G. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and R. Salakhutdinov, “Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 1929–1958, 2014.
  22. B. Zoph and Q. V. Le, “Neural architecture search with reinforcement learning,” ArXiv: Machine Learning, vol. 1611.01578, 2017.
  23. L. A. Jeni, J. F. Cohn, and F. De La Torre, “Facing imbalanced data–recommendations for the use of performance metrics,” in 2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, 2013, pp. 245–251.
  24. H. R. Kunsch, “The Jackknife and the Bootstrap for General Stationary Observations,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1217–1241, 1989.
  25. O. Pons, “Bootstrap of means under stratified sampling,” Electronic Journal of Statistics, vol. 1, pp. 381–391, 2007.

Summary

  • The paper presents RNN-BOF, a global RNN model that uses LSTM cells to predict binary outcomes of inpatient aggression.
  • The study applies a holistic training approach integrating continuous, categorical, and binary patient data for improved accuracy.
  • The paper demonstrates that RNN-BOF outperforms traditional psychometric instruments, as evidenced by a higher AUC-PRG in forecasting aggression.

Recurrent Neural Networks Enhance Prediction of Inpatient Aggression

Inpatient aggression poses significant challenges in psychiatric settings, prompting the need for reliable methods to predict such events. Traditional tools, like psychometric assessment instruments, offer structured measures to assess future risks. However, they lack the ability to harness temporal relationships in recurrent patient assessments. A paper explored an alternative approach, presenting a novel model, named Recurrent Neural Network for Binary Outcome Forecasting (RNN-BOF), that leverages the power of artificial intelligence to predict binary outcomes like inpatient aggression.

The paper harnessed a recurrent neural network (RNN), a type of deep learning model adept at handling sequential data, to provide probabilistic forecasts of whether an adverse event, such as patient aggression, would occur in the following period. RNN-BOF stands out for its global training approach, which means it learns from the data of a whole population of patients simultaneously. This not only allows the model to gather richer insights by identifying patterns across different patients but also circumvents the need for every patient’s data to follow similar trends.

The researchers constructed the RNN-BOF architecture using long short-term memory (LSTM) cells. Unlike other time series forecasters, RNN-BOF is designed to predict the likelihood of the next time interval being an 'event' (aggressive incident) or 'non-event', providing a probability score associated with this outcome. Particularly innovative is the model’s ability to include various predictors in its consideration: it can process binary time series data indicating aggressive incidents, as well as continuous and categorical patient data like clinical features and demographic information.

The effectiveness of RNN-BOF was tested on a real-world dataset from Thomas Embling Hospital, which included daily records of aggression incidents alongside psychometric evaluations and other patient features. The model was benchmarked against conventional psychometric instruments and several state-of-the-art machine learning classifiers. The results were promising: RNN-BOF demonstrated a significant increase in performance over both the traditional instruments and other machine learning approaches.

What makes the performance comparison compelling is the use of the Precision Recall Gain (PRG) curve, which is regarded as better suited for datasets with imbalanced outcomes, such as the one used in the paper where actual aggressive incidents were rare compared to non-incidents. The increased area under the PRG curve (AUC-PRG) for RNN-BOF indicated its superior ability to distinguish between true instances of aggression and false alarms—a crucial factor in clinical settings where false positives could drain resources and cause unnecessary distress.

Given these findings, the potential applications for RNN-BOF and similar AI-driven models are broad, extending beyond the psychiatric inpatient setting. For example, this forecasting approach could aid in anticipating various binary outcomes in different medical fields or in predicting events within law enforcement contexts.

In summary, the paper positions RNN-based models as promising instruments in binary outcome forecasting tasks, offering more nuanced and dynamic risk assessments than many current methods. As data collection in clinical environments becomes increasingly rich and complex, the application of such advanced AI models may well be a significant step forward in proactive patient care and resource management.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets