RNN-BOF: A Multivariate Global Recurrent Neural Network for Binary Outcome Forecasting of Inpatient Aggression (2312.01029v1)
Abstract: Psychometric assessment instruments aid clinicians by providing methods of assessing the future risk of adverse events such as aggression. Existing machine learning approaches have treated this as a classification problem, predicting the probability of an adverse event in a fixed future time period from the scores produced by both psychometric instruments and clinical and demographic covariates. We instead propose modelling a patient's future risk using a time series methodology that learns from longitudinal data and produces a probabilistic binary forecast that indicates the presence of the adverse event in the next time period. Based on the recent success of Deep Neural Nets for globally forecasting across many time series, we introduce a global multivariate Recurrent Neural Network for Binary Outcome Forecasting, that trains from and for a population of patient time series to produce individual probabilistic risk assessments. We use a moving window training scheme on a real world dataset of 83 patients, where the main binary time series represents the presence of aggressive events and covariate time series represent clinical or demographic features and psychometric measures. On this dataset our approach was capable of a significant performance increase against both benchmark psychometric instruments and previously used machine learning methodologies.
- J. Ogloff and M. Daffern, “The dynamic appraisal of situational aggression: An instrument to assess risk for imminent aggression in psychiatric inpatients,” Behavioral sciences & the law, vol. 24, pp. 799–813, 2006.
- C. D. Webster, T. L. Nicholls, M.-L. Martin, S. L. Desmarais, and J. Brink, “Short-term assessment of risk and treatability (start): the case for a new structured professional judgment scheme,” Behavioral sciences & the law, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 747–766, 2006.
- I. R. Galatzer-Levy, K.-I. Karstoft, A. Statnikov, and A. Y. Shalev, “Quantitative forecasting of ptsd from early trauma responses: A machine learning application,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 59, pp. 68–76, 2014.
- N. Parghi, L. Chennapragada, S. Barzilay, S. Newkirk, B. Ahmedani, B. Lok, and I. Galynker, “Assessing the predictive ability of the suicide crisis inventory for near-term suicidal behavior using machine learning approaches,” International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, vol. 30, p. e1863, 2021.
- G. Orrù, M. Monaro, C. Conversano, A. Gemignani, and G. Sartori, “Machine learning in psychometrics and psychological research,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 10, p. 2970, 2020.
- P. Montero-Manso and R. J. Hyndman, “Principles and algorithms for forecasting groups of time series: Locality and globality,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1632–1653, 2021.
- R. Sen, H.-F. Yu, and I. Dhillon, “Think globally, act locally: A deep neural network approach to high-dimensional time series forecasting,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. d’Alché Buc, E. Fox, and R. Garnett, Eds., vol. 32. Curran Associates, Inc., 2019.
- Z. Li, J. He, H. Liu, and X. Du, “Combining global and sequential patterns for multivariate time series forecasting,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, 2020, pp. 180–187.
- K. Bandara, P. Shi, C. Bergmeir, H. Hewamalage, Q. Tran, and B. Seaman, “Sales demand forecast in e-commerce using a long short-term memory neural network methodology,” in Neural Information Processing, T. Gedeon, K. W. Wong, and M. Lee, Eds., vol. 1142. Cham: Springer, 2019, pp. 462–474.
- P. Flach and M. Kull, “Precision-recall-gain curves: Pr analysis done right,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, C. Cortes, N. Lawrence, D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, and R. Garnett, Eds., vol. 28. Curran Associates, Inc., 2015.
- S. Makridakis, E. Spiliotis, and V. Assimakopoulos, “The m4 competition: Results, findings, conclusion and way forward,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 802–808, 2018.
- S. Smyl, “A hybrid method of exponential smoothing and recurrent neural networks for time series forecasting,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 75–85, 2020.
- H. Hewamalage, C. Bergmeir, and K. Bandara, “Global Models for Time Series Forecasting: A Simulation Study,” arXiv, 2020.
- H. Hewamalage, C. Bergmeir, and K. Bandara, “Recurrent neural networks for time series forecasting: Current status and future directions,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 37, pp. 388–427, 2021.
- E. Bautu, S. Kim, A. Bautu, H. Luchian, and B.-T. Zhang, “Evolving hypernetwork models of binary time series for forecasting price movements on stock markets,” IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 11, pp. 166–173, 2009.
- C. Jentsch and L. Reichmann, “Generalized binary time series models,” Econometrics, vol. 7, p. 47, 2019.
- W. T. M. Dunsmuir and D. J. Scott, “The glarma package for observation-driven time series regression of counts,” Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 67, no. 7, p. 1–36, 2015.
- A. M. Aguilera, M. Escabias, and M. J. Valderrama, “Forecasting binary longitudinal data by a functional pc-arima model,” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 3187–3197, 2008.
- R. Likert, “A technique for the measurement of attitudes,” Archives of psychology, vol. 22, no. 140, pp. 5–55, 1933.
- K. Bandara, C. Bergmeir, and S. Smyl, “Forecasting across time series databases using recurrent neural networks on groups of similar series: A clustering approach,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 140, p. 112896, 2020.
- N. Srivastava, G. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and R. Salakhutdinov, “Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 1929–1958, 2014.
- B. Zoph and Q. V. Le, “Neural architecture search with reinforcement learning,” ArXiv: Machine Learning, vol. 1611.01578, 2017.
- L. A. Jeni, J. F. Cohn, and F. De La Torre, “Facing imbalanced data–recommendations for the use of performance metrics,” in 2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, 2013, pp. 245–251.
- H. R. Kunsch, “The Jackknife and the Bootstrap for General Stationary Observations,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1217–1241, 1989.
- O. Pons, “Bootstrap of means under stratified sampling,” Electronic Journal of Statistics, vol. 1, pp. 381–391, 2007.