Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
194 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Global Localization: Utilizing Relative Spatio-Temporal Geometric Constraints from Adjacent and Distant Cameras (2312.00500v1)

Published 1 Dec 2023 in cs.CV and cs.RO

Abstract: Re-localizing a camera from a single image in a previously mapped area is vital for many computer vision applications in robotics and augmented/virtual reality. In this work, we address the problem of estimating the 6 DoF camera pose relative to a global frame from a single image. We propose to leverage a novel network of relative spatial and temporal geometric constraints to guide the training of a Deep Network for localization. We employ simultaneously spatial and temporal relative pose constraints that are obtained not only from adjacent camera frames but also from camera frames that are distant in the spatio-temporal space of the scene. We show that our method, through these constraints, is capable of learning to localize when little or very sparse ground-truth 3D coordinates are available. In our experiments, this is less than 1% of available ground-truth data. We evaluate our method on 3 common visual localization datasets and show that it outperforms other direct pose estimation methods.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. A. Kendall, M. Grimes, and R. Cipolla, “PoseNet: A Convolutional Network for Real-Time 6-DOF Camera Relocalization,” ICCV, pp. 2938–2946, 2015.
  2. A. Kendall and R. Cipolla, “Geometric Loss Functions for Camera Pose Regression with Deep Learning,” CVPR, pp. 6555–6564, 2017.
  3. F. Walch, C. Hazirbas, L. Leal-Taixé, T. Sattler, S. Hilsenbeck, and D. Cremers, “Image-Based Localization Using LSTMs for Structured Feature Correlation,” ICCV, pp. 627–637, 2017.
  4. B. Wang, C. Chen, C. X. Lu, P. Zhao, A. Trigoni, and A. Markham, “AtLoc: Attention Guided Camera Localization,” in AAAI, 2020.
  5. R. Clark, S. Wang, A. Markham, A. Trigoni, and H. Wen, “VidLoc: A Deep Spatio-Temporal Model for 6-DoF Video-Clip Relocalization,” CVPR, pp. 2652–2660, 2017.
  6. S. Brahmbhatt, J. Gu, K. Kim, J. Hays, and J. Kautz, “Geometry-Aware Learning of Maps for Camera Localization,” in CVPR, 2018.
  7. A. Valada, N. Radwan, and W. Burgard, “Deep Auxiliary Learning for Visual Localization and Odometry,” in ICRA, 2018.
  8. F. Ott, T. Feigl, C. Loffler, and C. Mutschler, “ViPR: Visual-Odometry-aided Pose Regression for 6DoF Camera Localization,” in CVPRW, 2020, pp. 187–198.
  9. T. Sattler, Q. Zhou, M. Pollefeys, and L. Leal-Taixe, “Understanding the limitations of cnn-based absolute camera pose regression,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., 2019, pp. 3297–3307.
  10. W. Kabsch, “A Solution for the Best Rotation to Relate Two Sets of Vectors,” Acta Crystallographica Section A, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 922–923, Sep 1976.
  11. M. Fischler and R. Bolles, “Random Sample Consensus: A Paradigm for Model Fitting with Applications to Image Analysis and Automated Cartography,” Commun. ACM, vol. 24, pp. 381–395, 1981.
  12. T. Sattler, B. Leibe, and L. Kobbelt, “Efficient & Effective Prioritized Matching for Large-Scale Image-Based Localization,” PAMI, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1744–1756, 2017.
  13. E. Brachmann and C. Rother, “Learning Less is More - 6D Camera Localization Via 3D Surface Regression,” in CVPR, 2018.
  14. ——, “Visual Camera Re-Localization from RGB and RGB-D Images Using DSAC,” PAMI, no. 01, pp. 1–1, apr 5555.
  15. M. Altillawi, “PixSelect: Less but Reliable Pixels for Accurate and Efficient Localization,” in ICRA, 2022, pp. 4156–4162.
  16. P.-E. Sarlin, A. Unagar, M. Larsson, H. Germain, C. Toft, V. Larsson, M. Pollefeys, V. Lepetit, L. Hammarstrand, F. Kahl, and T. Sattler, “Back to the Feature: Learning Robust Camera Localization from Pixels to Pose,” in CVPR, 2021.
  17. H. Blanton, S. Workman, and N. Jacobs, “A Structure-Aware Method for Direct Pose Estimation,” in WACV, 2022, pp. 2019–2028.
  18. F. Xue, X. Wu, S. Cai, and J. Wang, “Learning Multi-View Camera Relocalization With Graph Neural Networks,” in CVPR, 2020, pp. 11 372–11 381.
  19. F. Xue, X. Wang, Z. Yan, Q. Wang, J. Wang, and H. Zha, “Local Supports Global: Deep Camera Relocalization with Sequence Enhancement,” in ICCV, 2019, pp. 2841–2850.
  20. J. Shotton, B. Glocker, C. Zach, S. Izadi, A. Criminisi, and A. Fitzgibbon, “Scene Coordinate Regression Forests for Camera Relocalization in RGB-D Images,” CVPR, pp. 2930–2937, 2013.
  21. J. Valentin, A. Dai, M. Nießner, P. Kohli, P. Torr, S. Izadi, and C. Keskin, “Learning to Navigate the Energy Landscape,” in 3DV, 2016, pp. 323–332.
  22. T. Naseer and W. Burgard, “Deep Regression for Monocular Camera-Based 6-DOF Global Localization in Outdoor Environments,” IROS, pp. 1525–1530, 2017.
  23. M. Cai, C. Shen, and I. D. Reid, “A Hybrid Probabilistic Model for Camera Relocalization,” in BMVC, 2018.
  24. E. Brachmann, “7scenes_rendered_depth.tar.gz,” in DSAC* Visual Re-Localization [Data].   heiDATA, 2020.
  25. ——, “12scenes_rendered_depth.tar.gz,” in DSAC* Visual Re-Localization [Data].   heiDATA, 2020.
  26. V. Nair and G. E. Hinton, “Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines,” in ICML, 2010, pp. 807–814.
  27. X.-S. Gao, X.-R. Hou, J. Tang, and H.-F. Cheng, “Complete Solution Classification for the Perspective-Three-Point Problem,” PAMI, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 930–943, 2003.
  28. G. Bradski, “The OpenCV Library,” Dr. Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools, 2000.
  29. I. Melekhov, J. Ylioinas, J. Kannala, and E. Rahtu, “Image-Based Localization Using Hourglass Networks,” ICCVW, pp. 870–877, 2017.
  30. J. Wu, L. Ma, and X. Hu, “Delving Deeper into Convolutional Neural Networks for Camera Relocalization,” in ICRA, 2017, pp. 5644–5651.
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a novel method that leverages both adjacent and distant frame constraints to enhance global camera localization even with less than 1% of 3D ground-truth data.
  • It employs a dual-map strategy by predicting corresponding 3D points and uses the Kabsch algorithm with weighted confidence factors for precise rigid alignment.
  • Experiments demonstrate that the method significantly outperforms direct pose regression approaches, offering improved accuracy in challenging real-world scenarios.

Understanding Camera Localization with Networks

Introduction to Camera Re-Localization

Camera re-localization, which involves pinpointing a camera's position and orientation from a single image within a pre-mapped area, is critical for various computer vision tasks like robot navigation and virtual reality applications. With advancements in deep learning, numerous neural network-based approaches have been developed to solve the camera pose estimation problems. Unlike traditional methods that regress directly from image to pose, leveraging geometric information about the scene shows promise for enhancing localization accuracy.

A Novel Approach to Learning Geometry

This research introduces a unique strategy that harnesses relative spatial and temporal geometric constraints to improve training of neural networks for global camera localization. The approach focuses on using not just adjacent temporal information but also data from temporally distant frames, creating a network of geometric constraints over space and time. By integrating constraints from different sequences, the model can be trained even when less than 1% of the 3D ground-truth data is available for an area. This paper's methodology demonstrates superior performance over other direct camera pose estimation methods across various datasets.

Training Deep Networks with Geometric Constraints

The method revolves around predicting two sets of corresponding 3D points: one set relative to the global coordinate frame of the scene and another as observed from the camera viewpoint, using the image depth information. These two sets, or maps, are aligned using a rigid alignment method to estimate the camera's pose. A core innovation of this work is the concurrent application of relative geometric constraints on temporally adjacent and distant frames during training, resulting in a robust training process even with sparse 3D ground-truth data.

Rigid Alignment and Weighted Estimates

Localization is performed by aligning the two learned map representations using the classic Kabsch algorithm in combination with innovatively predicted weighting factors. These weights help to guide the rigid alignment during localization by indicating the confidence of each 3D-3D point correspondence, allowing the model to compensate for imperfections in the learned maps.

Conclusion and Future Directions

The presented method proves suitable for environments where sparse ground-truth data is available and demonstrates significant localization accuracy improvements. A direction for further research could involve integrating this geometric constraint network with a differentiable RANSAC learning scheme to address any remaining limitations associated with the current rigid alignment strategy.