Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
133 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Markovian Embeddings of Non-Markovian Quantum Systems: Coupled Stochastic and Quantum Master Equations for Non-Markovian Quantum Systems (2312.00134v2)

Published 30 Nov 2023 in quant-ph, cs.SY, and eess.SY

Abstract: Quantum Markov models are employed ubiquitously in quantum physics and in quantum information theory due to their relative simplicity and analytical tractability. In particular, these models are known to give accurate approximations for a wide range of quantum optical and mesoscopic systems. However, in general, the validity of the Markov approximation entails assumptions regarding properties of the system of interest and its environment, which may not be satisfied or accurate in arbitrary physical systems. Therefore, developing useful modelling tools for general non-Markovian quantum systems for which the Markov approximation is inappropriate or deficient is an undertaking of significant importance. This work considers non-Markovian principal quantum systems that can be embedded in a larger Markovian quantum system with one or more compound baths consisting of an auxiliary quantum system and a quantum white noise field, and derives a set of coupled stochastic and quantum master equations for embedded non-Markovian quantum systems. The case of a purely Hamiltonian coupling between the principal and auxiliary systems as a closed system without coupling to white noises is included as a special case. The results are expected to be of interest for (open-loop and feedback) control of continuous-time non-Markovian systems and studying reduced models for numerical simulation of such systems. They may also shed more light on the general structure of continuous-time non-Markovian quantum systems.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. J. L. McCauley, “Non-Markov stochastic processes satisfying equations usually associated with a Markov process,” EPJ Special Topics, vol. 204, pp. 133–143, 2012.
  2. L. Accardi, A. Frigerio, and J. T. Lewis, “Quantum stochastic processes,” Publ. RIMS Kyoto Univ., vol. 19, pp. 97–133, 1982.
  3. H. I. Nurdin, “Quantum stochastic processes and the modelling of quantum noise,” in Encyclopedia of Systems and Control, J. Baillieul and T. Samad, Eds.   London: Springer, 2020.
  4. J. E. Gough and H. I. Nurdin, “Can quantum markov evolutions ever be dynamically decoupled?” in Proc. 56th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2017, pp. 6155–6160.
  5. A. Imamoglu, “Stochastic wave-function approach to non-Markovian systems,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 3650–3653, 1994.
  6. B. J. Dalton, S. M. Barnett, and B. M. Garraway, “Theory of pseudomodes in quantum optical processes,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 64, p. 053813, 2001.
  7. F. Mascherpa et al., “Optimized auxiliary oscillators for the simulation of general open quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 101, p. 052108, 2020.
  8. F. Chen, E. Arrigoni, and M. Galperin, “Markovian treatment of non-Markovian dynamics of open fermionic systems,” New J. Phys., vol. 21, p. 123035, 2019.
  9. J. Combes, J. Kerckhoff, and M. Sarovar, “The SLH framework for modeling quantum input-output networks,” Adv. Phys. X, vol. 2, no. 784, 2017.
  10. J. Gough, M. R. James, and H. I. Nurdin, “Quantum master equation and filter for systems driven by filed in a single photon state,” in Proc. IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2011, pp. 5570–5576.
  11. J. Gough, M. R. James, H. I. Nurdin, and J. Combes, “Quantum filtering for systems driven by fields in single-photon states or superposition of coherent states,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 86, p. 043819, 2012.
  12. J. E. Gough, M. R. James, and H. I. Nurdin, “Quantum trajectories for a class of continuous matrix product input states,” New J. Phys., vol. 16, p. 075008, 2014.
  13. ——, “Quantum filtering for systems driven by fields in single photon states and superposition of coherent states using non-markovian embeddings,” Quantum Inf Process, vol. 12, pp. 1469–1499, 2013.
  14. H. Song, G. Zhang, and Z. Xi, “Continuous-mode multi-photon filtering,” SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1602–1632, 2016.
  15. J. Gough and M. R. James, “Quantum feedback networks: Hamiltonian formulation,” Comm. Math. Phys., vol. 287, pp. 1109–1132, 2009.
  16. R. L. Hudson and K. R. Parthasarathy, “Quantum Ito’s formula and stochastic evolution,” Commun. Math. Phys., vol. 93, pp. 301–323, 1984.
  17. J. E. Gough, M. R. James, and H. I. Nurdin, “Squeezing components in linear quantum feedback networks,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 81, pp. 023 804–1– 023 804–15, 2010.
  18. J. Gough and M. R. James, “The series product and its application to quantum feedforward and feedback networks,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 2530–2544, 2009.
  19. M. James and J. Gough, “Quantum dissipative systems and feedback control design by interconnection,” IEEE Trans Automat. Control, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1806–1821, 2010.
  20. L. Bouten, R. van Handel, and M. R. James, “An introduction to quantum filtering,” SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 46, pp. 2199–2241, 2007.
  21. H. I. Nurdin and J. E. Gough, “Quantum feedback networks with uniform time delays,” in Proc. 56th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2017, pp. 6149–6154.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com