Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
134 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
10 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
47 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Optimizing ZX-Diagrams with Deep Reinforcement Learning (2311.18588v3)

Published 30 Nov 2023 in quant-ph and cs.LG

Abstract: ZX-diagrams are a powerful graphical language for the description of quantum processes with applications in fundamental quantum mechanics, quantum circuit optimization, tensor network simulation, and many more. The utility of ZX-diagrams relies on a set of local transformation rules that can be applied to them without changing the underlying quantum process they describe. These rules can be exploited to optimize the structure of ZX-diagrams for a range of applications. However, finding an optimal sequence of transformation rules is generally an open problem. In this work, we bring together ZX-diagrams with reinforcement learning, a machine learning technique designed to discover an optimal sequence of actions in a decision-making problem and show that a trained reinforcement learning agent can significantly outperform other optimization techniques like a greedy strategy, simulated annealing, and state-of-the-art hand-crafted algorithms. The use of graph neural networks to encode the policy of the agent enables generalization to diagrams much bigger than seen during the training phase.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (40)
  1. “Picturing quantum processes: A first course in quantum theory and diagrammatic reasoning”. Cambridge University Press.  (2017).
  2. Ross Duncan. “A graphical approach to measurement-based quantum computing”. In Quantum Physics and Linguistics: A Compositional, Diagrammatic Discourse. Oxford University Press (2013).
  3. “Barren plateaus in quantum tensor network optimization”. Quantum 7, 974 (2023).
  4. “Graphical structures for design and verification of quantum error correction”. Quantum Science and Technology 8, 045028 (2023).
  5. “Verifying the smallest interesting colour code with quantomatic.”. In Proceedings 14th International Conference on Quantum Physics and Logic.  (2107). arXiv:1706.02717.
  6. “Speeding up quantum circuits simulation using ZX-calculus” (2023). arXiv:2305.02669.
  7. “Graph-theoretic simplification of quantum circuits with the ZX-calculus”. Quantum 4, 279 (2020).
  8. “Reducing 2-qubit gate count for ZX-calculus based quantum circuit optimization”. In Proceedings 19th International Conference on Quantum Physics and Logic.  (2022). arXiv:2311.08881.
  9. “Annealing optimisation of mixed ZX phase circuits”. In Proceedings 19th International Conference on Quantum Physics and Logic.  (2023). arXiv:2206.11839.
  10. Aleks Kissinger and John van de Wetering. “Reducing the number of non-clifford gates in quantum circuits”. Phys. Rev. A 102, 022406 (2020).
  11. “A recursively partitioned approach to architecture-aware ZX polynomial synthesis and optimization” (2023). arXiv:2303.17366.
  12. “Playing atari with deep reinforcement learning” (2013). arXiv:1312.5602.
  13. “A general reinforcement learning algorithm that masters chess, shogi, and go through self-play”. Science 362, 1140–1144 (2018).
  14. “Reinforcement learning in robotics: A survey”. The International Journal of Robotics Research 32, 1238–1274 (2013).
  15. “Learning dexterous in-hand manipulation”. The International Journal of Robotics Research 39, 3–20 (2020).
  16. “Graph convolutional policy network for goal-directed molecular graph generation”. Advances in neural information processing systems31 (2018).
  17. “Graphaf: a flow-based autoregressive model for molecular graph generation”. In International Conference on Learning Representations.  (2020). arXiv:2001.09382.
  18. “Reinforcement learning with neural networks for quantum feedback”. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031084 (2018).
  19. “Simultaneous discovery of quantum error correction codes and encoders with a noise-aware reinforcement learning agent” (2023). arXiv:2311.04750.
  20. “Reinforcement learning decoders for fault-tolerant quantum computation”. Machine Learning: Science and Technology 2, 025005 (2020).
  21. “Experimental deep reinforcement learning for error-robust gate-set design on a superconducting quantum computer”. PRX Quantum 2, 040324 (2021).
  22. “Realizing a deep reinforcement learning agent discovering real-time feedback control strategies for a quantum system”. Nat. Comm. 14, 7138 (2023).
  23. “Quantum circuit optimization with deep reinforcement learning” (2021). arXiv:2103.07585.
  24. “Quarl: A learning-based quantum circuit optimizer” (2023). arXiv:2307.10120.
  25. “Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications”. AI Open 1, 57–81 (2020).
  26. Renaud Vilmart. “A near-minimal axiomatisation of ZX-calculus for pure qubit quantum mechanics”. In 2019 34th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS). Pages 1–10.  (2019).
  27. John van de Wetering. “ZX-calculus for the working quantum computer scientist” (2020). arXiv:2012.13966.
  28. “Reinforcement learning: An introduction”. MIT press.  (2018).
  29. “Proximal policy optimization algorithms” (2017). arXiv:1707.06347.
  30. “Neural message passing for quantum chemistry”. In International conference on machine learning. Pages 1263–1272. PMLR (2017).
  31. “Tf-gnn: Graph neural networks in tensorflow” (2022). arXiv:2207.03522.
  32. “The theory and practice of simulated annealing”. Pages 287–319. Springer US. Boston, MA (2003).
  33. “Graph neural networks: Foundations, frontiers, and applications”. Springer Singapore. Singapore (2022). url: graph-neural-networks.github.io.
  34. “Flow-preserving ZX-calculus rewrite rules for optimisation and obfuscation”. In Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Quantum Physics and Logic. Volume 384 of Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, pages 203–219. Open Publishing Association (2023).
  35. Jan Nogué Gómez. “Reinforcement learning based circuit compilation via ZX-calculus”. Master’s thesis. Universitat de Barcelona.  (2023).
  36. Maximilian Nägele. “Code for optimizing ZX-diagrams with deep reinforcement learning”. GitHub repository (2023). url: github.com/MaxNaeg/ZXreinforce.
  37. Schulmann John. “Approximating KL divergence”. personal blog (2020). url: http://joschu.net/blog/kl-approx.html.
  38. Schulmann John. “Modular rl”. GitHub repository (2018). url: github.com/joschu/modular_rl.
  39. “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization” (2014). arXiv:1412.6980.
  40. “What matters for on-policy deep actor-critic methods? a large-scale study”. In International conference on learning representations.  (2020). arXiv:2006.05990.
Citations (6)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a deep reinforcement learning framework that effectively reduces the complexity of ZX-diagrams for quantum circuit optimization.
  • The approach utilizes graph neural networks to encode policies, outperforming greedy strategies and simulated annealing in efficiency and scalability.
  • The study demonstrates robust generalization across larger diagrams, significantly cutting node counts and computational steps in quantum processes.

Overview of "Optimizing ZX-Diagrams with Deep Reinforcement Learning"

The paper "Optimizing ZX-Diagrams with Deep Reinforcement Learning" explores the optimization of ZX-diagrams, which are graphical representations crucial for a variety of quantum processes. These include tasks such as quantum circuit optimization and tensor network simulations, alongside supporting development in quantum error correction and measurement-based quantum computing.

Integration of Reinforcement Learning with ZX-Diagrams

ZX-diagrams are utilized due to their inherent local transformation rules that maintain the underlying quantum processes depicted. The challenge addressed in this paper lies in deriving an optimal sequence of these transformations, a problem that remains complex due to the vast solution space. The authors propose leveraging reinforcement learning (RL), a method traditionally employed in decision-making landscapes, especially under constraints of optimal strategy formulation.

The reinforcement learning agent is trained to perform transformations on ZX-diagrams to minimize their complexity. Notably, graph neural networks (GNNs) are used to encode the policy of the RL agent, enabling proficient generalization to diagrams significantly larger than those encountered during initial training phases.

Methodology and Implementation

The paper outlines a systematic approach where the policy network, based on GNN, processes the graph representation of ZX-diagrams, capturing the complexity and local features systematically. Through several layers of message passing, the network predicts transformations that reduce the diagram's node count, thereby optimizing it for specific quantum computing applications. The strategy employed by the RL agent is compared against traditional techniques such as greedy strategies and simulated annealing, showcasing superior performance in terms of efficiency and scalability.

Numerical Results and Performance Evaluation

Significant metrics include the RL agent's ability to simplify diagrams beyond simulated annealing and greedy strategy performance, with a striking reduction in node counts and computational steps required. This is validated over multiple sets of diagrams, demonstrating that the agent's learned policy is both non-trivial and effective. The agent's efficiency becomes particularly pronounced when dealing with diagrams much larger than those it was trained upon, indicating a robust generalization capacity inherent to the GNN architecture employed.

Implications and Future Direction

The research anchors itself as a precedent for deploying reinforcement learning within the domain of quantum computing, offering tangible methodology for ZX-diagram optimization. Practically, this assists in reducing quantum circuit complexity, potentially leading to more efficient quantum algorithm implementations.

For theoretical implications, the work suggests reinforcement learning, when equipped with the appropriate network architectures like GNNs, is well-suited for abstract problem spaces such as ZX-calculus transformations. Looking forward, adapting the reinforcement learning approach to wider contexts—such as improving gFlow preservation algorithms for quantum circuits or further fine-tuning for large-scale quantum simulations—could extend the applicability of this research substantially.

Overall, the paper presents a structured and promising approach toward automated optimization in quantum computing, heralding further exploration into machine learning strategies tailored for advanced quantum technology problems.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com