Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
120 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

ROSO: Improving Robotic Policy Inference via Synthetic Observations (2311.16680v2)

Published 28 Nov 2023 in cs.RO and cs.AI

Abstract: In this paper, we propose the use of generative AI to improve zero-shot performance of a pre-trained policy by altering observations during inference. Modern robotic systems, powered by advanced neural networks, have demonstrated remarkable capabilities on pre-trained tasks. However, generalizing and adapting to new objects and environments is challenging, and fine-tuning visuomotor policies is time-consuming. To overcome these issues we propose Robotic Policy Inference via Synthetic Observations (ROSO). ROSO uses stable diffusion to pre-process a robot's observation of novel objects during inference time to fit within its distribution of observations of the pre-trained policies. This novel paradigm allows us to transfer learned knowledge from known tasks to previously unseen scenarios, enhancing the robot's adaptability without requiring lengthy fine-tuning. Our experiments show that incorporating generative AI into robotic inference significantly improves successful outcomes, finishing up to 57% of tasks otherwise unsuccessful with the pre-trained policy.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. RT-2: vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control. arXiv:2307.15818, 2023.
  2. InstructPix2Pix: learning to follow image editing instructions. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 18392–18402, 2023.
  3. Language models are few-shot learners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 1877–1901, 2020.
  4. End-to-end object detection with transformers. In Computer Vision – ECCV 2020, pages 213–229, 2020.
  5. Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 9650–9660, 2021.
  6. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. In 9th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2021.
  7. Google scanned objects: A high-quality dataset of 3D scanned household items. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2022.
  8. Deep spatial autoencoders for visuomotor learning. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2016.
  9. Segment anything. arXiv:2304.02643, 2023.
  10. Learning hand-eye coordination for robotic grasping with deep learning and large-scale data collection. The International journal of robotics research, 37(4-5):421–436, 2018.
  11. Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with grounded pre-training for open-set object detection. arXiv:2303.05499, 2023.
  12. Simple open-vocabulary object detection. In Computer Vision – ECCV 2022, pages 728–755, 2022.
  13. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 139, pages 8748–8763, 2021.
  14. Zero-shot text-to-image generation. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 139, pages 8821–8831. PMLR, 2021.
  15. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 10684–10695, 2022.
  16. Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 35, pages 36479–36494, 2022.
  17. CLIPort: what and where pathways for robotic manipulation. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 164, pages 894–906. PMLR, 2022.
  18. Visual question answering: A survey of methods and datasets. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 163:21–40, 2017.
  19. Scaling robot learning with semantically imagined experience. arXiv:2302.11550, 2023.
  20. Transporter networks: Rearranging the visual world for robotic manipulation. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 2021.
  21. Socratic Models: composing zero-shot multimodal reasoning with language. In Proceedings of International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023.
  22. Modular deep q networks for sim-to-real transfer of visuo-motor policies. In Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation (ACRA), 2017.
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper introduces ROSO, which leverages generative AI to modify instructions and images, enabling robots to handle unseen objects without extensive retraining.
  • The methodology employs color mapping and image editing via Stable Diffusion to convert unfamiliar observations into recognized formats, achieving up to a 57% success rate increase.
  • The study emphasizes that high-quality image edits and consistent object generation are crucial for aligning generative outputs with pre-trained models, improving overall task performance.

Objectives and Challenges in Robotic Policy Inference

Robotic systems have progressed significantly with neural network integration, enhancing their ability to perform complex tasks, such as pick-and-place operations. However, deploying these systems in unfamiliar environments or with unseen objects is a hurdle due to the high computational cost involved in retraining or fine-tuning on new data.

Introducing ROSO

An innovative approach has been put forward called Robotic Policy Inference via Synthetic Observations (ROSO). The concept involves the use of generative AI to alter a robot's sensory data during policy execution to fit within the distribution of pre-trained tasks. This is achieved by pre-processing novel observations using a model called Stable Diffusion.

Methodology

ROSO consists of two key parts: instruction modification and image modification. For instruction modification, unseen object colors are mapped to seen ones using a colormap of previously successful tasks. Within image modification, tasks are performed with a focus on semantic meaning and quality of image edits, using generative models to replace unseen objects with seen equivalents. An example would be altering a blue cube (unseen during training) to a red cube (seen) to fool the pre-trained networks into recognizing the object.

Results and Observations

The paper's experiments show that incorporating generative AI significantly enhances task performance, with sizable success rate increases, particularly in scenarios involving unseen object colors, objects, or backgrounds. For example, unseen background color tasks saw a 57% increase in successful outcomes.

Challenges and Considerations

Despite the success, failures in the ROSO pipeline were noted, mainly due to object detection inaccuracies and image quality issues during object transformation. The paper shows that object modification based on image edit quality typically yields better results than simply using semantic meaning. Lastly, consistent object generation and the alignment of generative models' output with the training data are essential for robust performance. The pipeline improvement could lead to a more sophisticated understanding of integrating perceived environments with robotic action without extensive retraining.

Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

GitHub