The Adoption and Efficacy of Large Language Models: Evidence From Consumer Complaints in the Financial Industry (2311.16466v3)
Abstract: LLMs are reshaping consumer decision-making, particularly in communication with firms, yet our understanding of their impact remains limited. This research explores the effect of LLMs on consumer complaints submitted to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau from 2015 to 2024, documenting the adoption of LLMs for drafting complaints and evaluating the likelihood of obtaining relief from financial firms. Utilizing a leading AI detection tool, we analyzed over 1 million complaints and identified a significant increase in LLM usage following the release of ChatGPT. We establish a causal relationship between LLM usage and an increased likelihood of obtaining relief by employing instrumental variables to address endogeneity in LLM adoption. Experimental data further support this link, demonstrating that LLMs enhance the clarity and persuasiveness of consumer narratives. Our findings suggest that facilitating access to LLMs can help firms better understand consumer concerns and level the playing field among consumers. This underscores the importance of policies promoting technological accessibility, enabling all consumers to effectively voice their concerns.
- The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. American Economic Journal: Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1):5–44, 2014.
- Winston AI. Best AI Detectors in 2023 Compared. https://bit.ly/3SMYXWq, 2023. Accessed: 2023-11-18.
- McKenzie Prillaman. ‘Chatgpt detector’ catches AI-generated papers with unprecedented accuracy. Nature, 2023.
- Most americans haven’t used chatgpt; few think it will have a major impact on their job. Pew Research Center, 8 2023. https://pewrsr.ch/3SCeWX9. Accessed: 2023-11-15.
- Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Tech. Report 8-75, Naval Technical Training, U. S. Naval Air Station, 1975.
- Jonathan Anderson. Lix and rix: Variations on a little-known readability index. Journal of Reading, 26(6):490–496, 1983.
- Rethinking self-supervision objectives for generalizable coherence modeling. In Proc. 60th Ann. Meeting Assoc. Comput. Linguistics (Vol. 1: Long Papers), pages 6044–6059, 2022.
- A computational approach to politeness with application to social factors. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2013. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:12383721.
- When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. The Journal of finance, 66(1):35–65, 2011.
- Finbert: A large language model for extracting information from financial text. Contemporary Accounting Research, 40(2):806–841, 2023.
- Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science, 381:187–192, 2023.
- The Potential of Generative AI for Personalized Persuasion at Scale. PsyArXiv, 2023.
- Improving interpersonal communication by simulating audiences with language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.00687, 2023.
- The geography of financial literacy. RAND Working Paper Series No. WR-893-SSA, 2011.
- The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175:121359, 2022.
- Superhuman artificial intelligence can improve human decision-making by increasing novelty. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(12):e2214840120, 2023.
- How quantifying the shape of stories predicts their success. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(26):e2011695118, 2021.
- How concrete language shapes customer satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(5):787–806, 2021.
- Frontiers: Supporting content marketing with natural language generation. Marketing Science, 41(3):441–452, 2022.
- How verb tense shapes persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, page ucad006, 2023.
- Public disclosure and consumer financial protection. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, pages 1–56, 2019.
- Learning from peers: Evidence from disclosure of consumer complaints. Journal of Accounting and Economics, page 101620, 2023.
- Testing of detection tools for ai-generated text. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.15666, 2023.
- Jonathan Gillham. Ai content detector accuracy review + open source dataset and research tool. https://originality.ai/blog/ai-content-detection-accuracy, 2023. Accessed: 2023-11-26.
- Minkyu Shin (4 papers)
- Jin Kim (21 papers)
- Jiwoong Shin (3 papers)