Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
166 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Joint Deep Image Restoration and Unsupervised Quality Assessment (2311.16372v1)

Published 27 Nov 2023 in eess.IV

Abstract: Deep learning techniques have revolutionized the fields of image restoration and image quality assessment in recent years. While image restoration methods typically utilize synthetically distorted training data for training, deep quality assessment models often require expensive labeled subjective data. However, recent studies have shown that activations of deep neural networks trained for visual modeling tasks can also be used for perceptual quality assessment of images. Following this intuition, we propose a novel attention-based convolutional neural network capable of simultaneously performing both image restoration and quality assessment. We achieve this by training a JPEG deblocking network augmented with "quality attention" maps and demonstrating state-of-the-art deblocking accuracy, achieving a high correlation of predicted quality with human opinion scores.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (29)
  1. “Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity.,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 600–612, 2004.
  2. “Gradient magnitude similarity deviation: A highly efficient perceptual image quality index,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 684–695, 2014.
  3. R. Soundararajan and A. C. Bovik, “Video quality assessment by reduced reference spatio-temporal entropic differencing,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 684–694, 2013.
  4. “Speed-qa: Spatial efficient entropic differencing for image and video quality,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1333–1337, 2017.
  5. “No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 4695–4708, 2012.
  6. “Making a “completely blind” image quality analyzer,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 209–212, 2013.
  7. “Convolutional neural networks for no-reference image quality assessment,” in 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2014, pp. 1733–1740.
  8. “From patches to pictures (paq-2-piq): Mapping the perceptual space of picture quality,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.10088, 2019.
  9. R. Girshick, “Fast r-cnn,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2015, pp. 1440–1448.
  10. “Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks,” 2016.
  11. “Perceptual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution,” in Computer Vision – ECCV 2016, Bastian Leibe, Jiri Matas, Nicu Sebe, and Max Welling, Eds., Cham, 2016, pp. 694–711, Springer International Publishing.
  12. K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman, “Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition,” CoRR, vol. abs/1409.1556, 2014.
  13. “The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric,” in 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018, pp. 586–595.
  14. “One transform to compute them all: Efficient fusion-based full-reference video quality assessment,” 2023.
  15. “Towards flexible blind jpeg artifacts removal,” in 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2021, pp. 4977–4986.
  16. “Deep convolution networks for compression artifacts reduction,” CoRR, vol. abs/1608.02778, 2016.
  17. “Multi-level wavelet convolutional neural networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 74973–74985, 2019.
  18. “Residual attention network for image classification,” 2017.
  19. “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016, pp. 770–778.
  20. “U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015, N. Navab, J. Hornegger, W. M. Wells, and A. F. Frangi, Eds., Cham, 2015, pp. 234–241, Springer International Publishing.
  21. E. Agustsson and R. Timofte, “Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Dataset and study,” in The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops, July 2017.
  22. “Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution,” 2017.
  23. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” 2017.
  24. H. R. Sheikh, “Image and video quality assessment research at live,” http://live. ece. utexas. edu/research/quality, 2003.
  25. C. Yim and A. C. Bovik, “Quality assessment of deblocked images,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 88–98, 2011.
  26. “Quantization guided jpeg artifact correction,” in Computer Vision – ECCV 2020, Andrea Vedaldi, Horst Bischof, Thomas Brox, and Jan-Michael Frahm, Eds., Cham, 2020, pp. 293–309, Springer International Publishing.
  27. “A hitchhiker’s guide to structural similarity,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 28872–28896, 2021.
  28. E. Larson and D. Chandler, “Most apparent distortion: Full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy,” J. Electronic Imaging, vol. 19, pp. 011006, 01 2010.
  29. “Image database tid2013: Peculiarities, results and perspectives,” Signal Processing: Image Communication, vol. 30, pp. 57–77, 2015.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.