Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
158 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Reducing Histopathology Slide Magnification Improves the Accuracy and Speed of Ovarian Cancer Subtyping (2311.13956v1)

Published 23 Nov 2023 in eess.IV

Abstract: Artificial intelligence has found increasing use for ovarian cancer morphological subtyping from histopathology slides, but the optimal magnification for computational interpretation is unclear. Higher magnifications offer abundant cytological information, whereas lower magnifications give a broader histoarchitectural overview. Using attention-based multiple instance learning, we performed the most extensive analysis of ovarian cancer tissue magnifications to date, with data at six magnifications subjected to the same preprocessing, hyperparameter tuning, cross-validation and hold-out testing procedures. The lowest magnifications (1.25x and 2.5x) performed best in cross-validation, and intermediate magnifications (5x and 10x) performed best in hold-out testing (62% and 61% accuracy, respectively). Lower magnification models were also significantly faster, with the 5x model taking 5% as long to train and 31% as long to evaluate slides compared to 40x. This indicates that the standard usage of high magnifications for computational ovarian cancer subtyping may be unnecessary, with lower magnifications giving faster, more accurate alternatives.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (9)
  1. “Attention-based deep multiple instance learning,” in International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2018, pp. 2127–2136.
  2. “A comparison between single-and multi-scale approaches for classification of histopathology images,” Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 10, pp. 892658, 2022.
  3. “Artificial intelligence in ovarian cancer histopathology: a systematic review,” NPJ Precision Oncology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 83, 2023.
  4. “Deep learning-based histotype diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma whole-slide pathology images,” Modern Pathology, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1983–1990, 2022.
  5. “The utility of color normalization for ai-based diagnosis of hematoxylin and eosin-stained pathology images,” The Journal of Pathology, vol. 256, no. 1, pp. 15–24, 2022.
  6. “Predicting ovarian cancer treatment response in histopathology using hierarchical vision transformers and multiple instance learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.12866, 2023.
  7. “Synthesis of diagnostic quality cancer pathology images by generative adversarial networks,” The Journal of pathology, vol. 252, no. 2, pp. 178–188, 2020.
  8. “Heram: Multi-magnification graph-structured whole slide image representation,” 2022.
  9. “Data-efficient and weakly supervised computational pathology on whole-slide images,” Nature biomedical engineering, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 555–570, 2021.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.