Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Compositional Capabilities of Autoregressive Transformers: A Study on Synthetic, Interpretable Tasks (2311.12997v2)

Published 21 Nov 2023 in cs.LG

Abstract: Transformers trained on huge text corpora exhibit a remarkable set of capabilities, e.g., performing basic arithmetic. Given the inherent compositional nature of language, one can expect the model to learn to compose these capabilities, potentially yielding a combinatorial explosion of what operations it can perform on an input. Motivated by the above, we train autoregressive Transformer models on a synthetic data-generating process that involves compositions of a set of well-defined monolithic capabilities. Through a series of extensive and systematic experiments on this data-generating process, we show that: (1) autoregressive Transformers can learn compositional structures from small amounts of training data and generalize to exponentially or even combinatorially many functions; (2) generating intermediate outputs when composing functions is more effective for generalizing to new, unseen compositions than not generating any intermediate outputs (3) biases in the order of the compositions in the training data result in Transformers that fail to compose some combinations of functions; and (4) the attention layers select which capability to apply while the feed-forward layers execute the selected capability.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Rahul Ramesh (29 papers)
  2. Ekdeep Singh Lubana (33 papers)
  3. Mikail Khona (16 papers)
  4. Robert P. Dick (21 papers)
  5. Hidenori Tanaka (36 papers)
Citations (5)

Summary

Compositional Capabilities of Autoregressive Transformers: A Systematic Investigation

The paper presented in this paper investigates the compositional capabilities of autoregressive Transformers, with a focus on synthetic, interpretable tasks. It addresses an essential question in the domain of machine learning: whether Transformers trained on compositional data can not only solve the specific instances they have seen during training but also generalize to a broader set of compositions. In this context, compositional generalization refers to the ability of a model to apply known operations in novel combinations to solve tasks not explicitly encountered during training.

Key Findings

The paper outlines several significant findings through systematic experiments:

  1. Compositional Generalization: Autoregressive Transformers demonstrated the ability to learn and generalize compositional structures from limited amounts of training data. This ability allows the model to expand its operational repertoire exponentially or even combinatorially beyond what it explicitly encounters during training.
  2. Intermediate Outputs: The transformation process that allows models to generate intermediate outputs aids the model in effectively generalizing to new, unseen compositions. Generating such intermediate outputs enables the transformer to recursively apply functions, enhancing its generalization capabilities.
  3. Bias Impact: The order biases inherent in the training compositions significantly affect the model's performance on unseen function combinations. Specifically, these biases can lead to failures in composing certain combinations of functions, highlighting an area for further optimization in training regimes.
  4. Mechanism of Function Selection: The authors uncover that attention layers are responsible for selecting which capability to apply, and the feed-forward layers are responsible for executing these capabilities. This division of function aids in structuring the learning and application of composite tasks.

Implications

The results have both practical and theoretical implications. Practically, understanding the compositional capabilities of Transformers can enhance their application in various domains that require reasoning beyond rote memorization of training samples. This could advance fields like natural language processing, where complex and novel composition of tasks is a common requirement. Theoretically, these insights widen understanding of how neural networks can be trained to achieve complexity and flexibility beyond their explicit training data, suggesting pathways for developing more robust and capable models.

Future Directions

The paper suggests several avenues for future research. Key among them is exploring additional training protocols to reduce bias impact and improve out-of-order compositional generalization. Another potential area is extending this paper to more complex compositional constructs and evaluating how models trained on synthetic data transfer to real-world, compositional tasks. Furthermore, dissecting the specific roles of attention and feed-forward components in greater detail may yield more efficient architectures that are inherently robust to both order-invariant and order-variant data compositions.

This paper advances our understanding of Transformer's capabilities, shedding light on their potential not just as sequential learners but as dynamic systems capable of complex reasoning through composition, reinforcing the need for further investigation into the interplay between model architecture and training regimens.