Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
173 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Sparse graph counting and Kelley-Meka bounds for binary systems (2311.12248v5)

Published 21 Nov 2023 in math.CO

Abstract: In a recent breakthrough, Kelley and Meka (FOCS 2023) obtained a strong upper bound on the density of sets of integers without nontrivial three-term arithmetic progressions. In this work, we extend their result, establishing similar bounds for all linear patterns defined by binary systems of linear forms, where "binary" indicates that every linear form depends on exactly two variables. Prior to our work, no strong bounds were known for such systems even in the finite field model setting. A key ingredient in our proof is a graph counting lemma. The classical graph counting lemma, developed by Thomason (Random Graphs 1985) and Chung, Graham, and Wilson (Combinatorica 1989), is a fundamental tool in combinatorics. For a fixed graph $H$, it states that the number of copies of $H$ in a pseudorandom graph $G$ is similar to the number of copies of $H$ in a purely random graph with the same edge density as $G$. However, this lemma is only non-trivial when $G$ is a dense graph. In this work, we prove a graph counting lemma that is also effective when $G$ is sparse. Moreover, our lemma is well-suited for density increment arguments in additive number theory. As an immediate application, we obtain a strong bound for the Tur\'an problem in abelian Cayley sum graphs: let $\Gamma$ be a finite abelian group with odd order. If a Cayley sum graph on $\Gamma$ does not contain any $r$-clique as a subgraph, it must have at most $2{-\Omega_r(\log{1/16}|\Gamma|)}\cdot |\Gamma|2$ edges. These results hinge on the technology developed by Kelley and Meka and the follow-up work by Kelley, Lovett, and Meka (STOC 2024).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (35)
  1. Regularity inheritance in pseudorandom graphs. Random Structures & Algorithms, 56(2):306–338, 2020.
  2. F. A. Behrend. On sets of integers which contain no three terms in arithmetical progression. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 32:331–332, 1946.
  3. J. Bourgain. On triples in arithmetic progression. Geom. Funct. Anal., 9(5):968–984, 1999.
  4. Logarithmic bounds for Roth’s theorem via almost-periodicity. Discrete Anal., pages Paper No. 4, 20, 2019.
  5. Breaking the logarithmic barrier in roth’s theorem on arithmetic progressions, 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.03528.
  6. An improvement to the Kelley-Meka bounds on three-term arithmetic progressions, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02353.
  7. Extremal results in sparse pseudorandom graphs. Advances in Mathematics, 256:206–290, 2014.
  8. Sparse quasi-random graphs. Combinatorica, 22(2):217–244, 2002.
  9. Quasi-random graphs. Combinatorica, 9:345–362, 1989.
  10. Progression-free sets in ℤ4nsubscriptsuperscriptℤ𝑛4\mathbb{Z}^{n}_{4}blackboard_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are exponentially small. Ann. of Math. (2), 185(1):331–337, 2017.
  11. The asymptotic number of graphs not containing a fixed subgraph and a problem for hypergraphs having no exponent. Graphs Combin., 2(2):113–121, 1986.
  12. On large subsets of 𝔽qnsubscriptsuperscript𝔽𝑛𝑞\mathbb{F}^{n}_{q}blackboard_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with no three-term arithmetic progression. Ann. of Math. (2), 185(1):339–343, 2017.
  13. Dion Gijswijt. Excluding affine configurations over a finite field. Discrete Anal., pages Paper No. 21, 24, 2023.
  14. W. T. Gowers. A new proof of Szemerédi’s theorem. Geom. Funct. Anal., 11(3):465–588, 2001.
  15. The sparse regularity lemma and its applications. In Surveys in combinatorics 2005, volume 327 of London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., pages 227–258. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2005.
  16. Linear equations in primes. Ann. of Math. (2), pages 1753–1850, 2010.
  17. W. T. Gowers and J. Wolf. The true complexity of a system of linear equations. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3), 100(1):155–176, 2010.
  18. W. T. Gowers and J. Wolf. Linear forms and higher-degree uniformity for functions on 𝔽pnsubscriptsuperscript𝔽𝑛𝑝\mathbb{F}^{n}_{p}blackboard_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Geom. Funct. Anal., 21(1):36–69, 2011.
  19. D. R. Heath-Brown. Integer sets containing no arithmetic progressions. J. London Math. Soc. (2), 35(3):385–394, 1987.
  20. Explicit separations between randomized and deterministic number-on-forehead communication. In Proceedings of the 56st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 2024.
  21. Strong bounds for 3-progressions. In 2023 IEEE 64th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 933–973. 2023.
  22. Y. Kohayakawa. Szemerédi’s regularity lemma for sparse graphs. In Foundations of computational mathematics (Rio de Janeiro, 1997), pages 216–230. Springer, Berlin, 1997.
  23. Regular pairs in sparse random graphs i. Random Structures & Algorithms, 22(4):359–434, 2003.
  24. Embedding graphs with bounded degree in sparse pseudorandom graphs. Israel Journal of Mathematics, 139:93–137, 2004.
  25. On the triangle removal lemma for subgraphs of sparse pseudorandom graphs. In An Irregular Mind: Szemerédi is 70, pages 359–404. Springer, 2010.
  26. László Lovász. Large networks and graph limits, volume 60 of American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2012.
  27. Improved bounds for Szemerédi’s theorem, 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.17995.
  28. Klaus F Roth. On certain sets of integers. J. London Math. Soc, 28(104-109):3, 1953.
  29. I. Z. Ruzsa and E. Szemerédi. Triple systems with no six points carrying three triangles. In Combinatorics (Proc. Fifth Hungarian Colloq., Keszthely, 1976), Vol. II, volume 18 of Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai, pages 939–945. North-Holland, 1978.
  30. Tom Sanders. On Roth’s theorem on progressions. Ann. of Math. (2), 174(1):619–636, 2011.
  31. Tom Sanders. On the Bogolyubov–Ruzsa lemma. Analysis & PDE, 5(3):627 – 655, 2012.
  32. Endre Szemerédi. On sets of integers containing no k𝑘kitalic_k elements in arithmetic progression. Acta Arith, 27(199-245):2, 1975.
  33. E. Szemerédi. Integer sets containing no arithmetic progressions. Acta Math. Hungar., 56(1-2):155–158, 1990.
  34. Andrew Thomason. Pseudorandom graphs. In Random graphs ’85 (Poznań, 1985), volume 144 of North-Holland Math. Stud., pages 307–331. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1987.
  35. Additive combinatorics, volume 105 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, paperback edition, 2010.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.