Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Plum: Prompt Learning using Metaheuristic (2311.08364v3)

Published 14 Nov 2023 in cs.LG, cs.AI, and cs.DM

Abstract: Since the emergence of LLMs, prompt learning has become a popular method for optimizing and customizing these models. Special prompts, such as Chain-of-Thought, have even revealed previously unknown reasoning capabilities within these models. However, the progress of discovering effective prompts has been slow, driving a desire for general prompt optimization methods. Unfortunately, few existing prompt learning methods satisfy the criteria of being truly "general", i.e., automatic, discrete, black-box, gradient-free, and interpretable all at once. In this paper, we introduce metaheuristics, a branch of discrete non-convex optimization methods with over 100 options, as a promising approach to prompt learning. Within our paradigm, we test six typical methods: hill climbing, simulated annealing, genetic algorithms with/without crossover, tabu search, and harmony search, demonstrating their effectiveness in white-box and black-box prompt learning. Furthermore, we show that these methods can be used to discover more human-understandable prompts that were previously unknown in both reasoning and image generation tasks, opening the door to a cornucopia of possibilities in prompt optimization. We release all the codes in \url{https://github.com/research4pan/Plum}.

An Overview of Prompt Learning Using Metaheuristic: The Plum Approach

The paper presents a comprehensive exploration into the optimization and customization of LLMs through prompt learning, utilizing metaheuristic algorithms. The authors propose a novel framework, termed Plum, which applies discrete, non-convex optimization techniques to discover effective prompts. While prompt engineering has advanced in recent years, it often lacks generality, automation, and interpretability in its methodologies. Plum attempts to address these gaps by leveraging the inherent exploratory capabilities of metaheuristics, thus opening new pathways for prompt discovery.

Core Methodology

The Plum framework reinterprets prompt learning as a black-box discrete optimization challenge. It integrates metaheuristic algorithms with discrete search strategies, allowing for the automated discovery of prompts that are not only effective but also interpretable. Six specific metaheuristics are examined within this paradigm: hill climbing, simulated annealing, genetic algorithms with and without crossover, tabu search, and harmony search. Each of these algorithms is adapted to operate over a discrete space of prompt candidates, utilizing black-box evaluations to maximize a performance objective defined by the LLM’s task-specific metrics.

Experimental Results

The empirical evaluations conducted in the paper focus on both white-box models, where complete model parameters are accessible, and black-box models that interact only through discrete API endpoints, such as GPT-3. Across various tasks, including instruction following and image generation, Plum demonstrates superior performance in terms of both efficiency and outcomes. Notably, the introduction of harmony search in prompt optimization marks a first in the literature, showcasing its adaptability and robustness.

Impact and Future Directions

The implications of this research are multifaceted. Practically, Plum provides a scalable and resource-efficient method for optimizing prompts across a wide array of LLM applications, offering a potential reduction in computational costs and improving output quality. Theoretical implications include the bridging of discrete optimization theory and NLP, offering a fertile ground for future research in automated prompt discovery.

The paper also hints at the potential of Plum to uncover novel prompt patterns, as evidenced by improvements in reasoning tasks and image generation prompts. The adaptability of the framework suggests that it could accommodate further enhancements, such as the integration of additional metaheuristics or hybrid approaches that combine LLMs’ innate capabilities with optimization algorithms.

In conclusion, the Plum framework represents a significant development in the field of prompt learning, suggesting a promising trajectory for future work in AI optimizations. Future explorations could expand the scope of metaheuristic applications, refine the understanding of prompt impact on model performance, or explore the integration of multimodal prompt generation. As the landscape of LLM utilization broadens, methodologies like Plum are likely to become integral in maximizing the efficacy and efficiency of AI systems.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (9)
  1. Rui Pan (67 papers)
  2. Shuo Xing (15 papers)
  3. Shizhe Diao (48 papers)
  4. Xiang Liu (475 papers)
  5. Kashun Shum (7 papers)
  6. Jipeng Zhang (46 papers)
  7. Tong Zhang (569 papers)
  8. Wenhe Sun (1 paper)
  9. Renjie Pi (37 papers)
Citations (3)
Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com