Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Monkey: Image Resolution and Text Label Are Important Things for Large Multi-modal Models (2311.06607v4)

Published 11 Nov 2023 in cs.CV, cs.AI, and cs.CL

Abstract: Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have shown promise in vision-language tasks but struggle with high-resolution input and detailed scene understanding. Addressing these challenges, we introduce Monkey to enhance LMM capabilities. Firstly, Monkey processes input images by dividing them into uniform patches, each matching the size (e.g., 448x448) used in the original training of the well-trained vision encoder. Equipped with individual adapter for each patch, Monkey can handle higher resolutions up to 1344x896 pixels, enabling the detailed capture of complex visual information. Secondly, it employs a multi-level description generation method, enriching the context for scene-object associations. This two-part strategy ensures more effective learning from generated data: the higher resolution allows for a more detailed capture of visuals, which in turn enhances the effectiveness of comprehensive descriptions. Extensive ablative results validate the effectiveness of our designs. Additionally, experiments on 18 datasets further demonstrate that Monkey surpasses existing LMMs in many tasks like Image Captioning and various Visual Question Answering formats. Specially, in qualitative tests focused on dense text question answering, Monkey has exhibited encouraging results compared with GPT4V. Code is available at https://github.com/Yuliang-Liu/Monkey.

PDF HTML Abstract

Analysis of the "Monkey" Multimodal Model for Enhanced Image and Text Processing

The paper introduces "Monkey," a novel multimodal model designed to extend the capabilities of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) by addressing the challenge of handling high-resolution input and detailed scene comprehension in vision-language tasks. This work hinges on the integration of enhanced image processing techniques and sophisticated description generation methods, which together optimize the learning outcomes across various vision-language applications such as image captioning and visual question answering (VQA).

Methodological Advances

Enhanced Input Resolution:

Monkey's approach to enhancing resolution involves partitioning input images into uniform patches and processing them using a sliding window method. Each patch, scaled to match the resolution of 448×448 used in the original training of vision encoders, is handled independently. This technique allows processing of images up to 1344×896 pixels, thus preserving more detailed visual information. The utilization of independent adapters for each patch, integrated with LoRA-enhanced adjustments, mitigates the need for extensive pretraining typical in models like Qwen-VL, while maintaining computational efficiency.

Multi-level Description Generation:

Addressing the inadequacies of existing datasets, Monkey incorporates a multi-level description generation framework that compiles enriched caption datasets using diverse advanced systems. Leveraging models like BLIP2, PPOCR, and ChatGPT, Monkey synthesizes comprehensive descriptions by merging the outputs from these varied sources. This approach not only creates more contextually abundant annotations but also aligns closely with the semantic richness required for nuanced image-text correlations.

Experimental Validation

The paper provides extensive empirical evidence supporting the efficacy of Monkey's dual-strategy approach. The model demonstrates superior performance in a broad spectrum of benchmarks, surpassing existing models like GPT4V in complex VQA tasks, particularly those requiring dense text understanding. The competitive results, especially in the domain of document-oriented VQA, underscore the strength of high-resolution input in sharpening textual perception.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

The introduction of Monkey reflects a significant stride in multimodal model innovation, providing a scalable solution to high-resolution image processing that enhances detailed visual and textual comprehension. The findings suggest potential advancements in various applications, particularly those involving document analysis, complex scene understanding, and real-world text-intensive tasks. Practically, this research opens pathways for efficient integration of pre-existing multimodal models without exorbitant computational demands, paving the way for wide scalability and practical deployment.

Future Directions in AI Development

Future research could explore further optimization of adapter and patch handling strategies to reduce computational load even further while maintaining resolution quality. Expanding the multi-level description generation framework to include a broader array of datasets and environmental contexts may enhance contextual understanding. Additionally, integrating this model with other emerging AI technologies could expand its utility across new domains.

In conclusion, "Monkey" presents a robust framework that effectively combines high-resolution image processing with enriched contextual understanding, setting a benchmark for future developments in multimodal AI systems. The methodologies outlined provide valuable insights into achieving resolution and descriptive adequacy in LMMs without the disproportionate increase in resource expenditure.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown Bookmark Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (59)
  1. Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:23716–23736, 2022.
  2. Openflamingo: An open-source framework for training large autoregressive vision-language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.01390, 2023.
  3. Qwen-vl: A frontier large vision-language model with versatile abilities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12966, 2023.
  4. Introducing our multimodal models, 2023.
  5. Scene text visual question answering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 4291–4301, 2019.
  6. Coyo-700m: Image-text pair dataset. https://github.com/kakaobrain/coyo-dataset, 2022.
  7. Shikra: Unleashing multimodal llm’s referential dialogue magic. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.15195, 2023.
  8. Tabfact: A large-scale dataset for table-based fact verification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.02164, 2019.
  9. Pali-x: On scaling up a multilingual vision and language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18565, 2023.
  10. Pali-3 vision language models: Smaller, faster, stronger. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.09199, 2023.
  11. Vicuna: An open-source chatbot impressing gpt-4 with 90%* chatgpt quality, March 2023.
  12. InstructBLIP: Towards general-purpose vision-language models with instruction tuning. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023.
  13. Palm-e: An embodied multimodal language model. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2023.
  14. Pp-ocr: A practical ultra lightweight ocr system. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.09941, 2020.
  15. Mme: A comprehensive evaluation benchmark for multimodal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.13394, 2023.
  16. Making the v in vqa matter: Elevating the role of image understanding in visual question answering. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 6904–6913, 2017.
  17. Vizwiz grand challenge: Answering visual questions from blind people. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3608–3617, 2018.
  18. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. In The Tenth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2022, Virtual Event, April 25-29, 2022. OpenReview.net, 2022.
  19. Bliva: A simple multimodal llm for better handling of text-rich visual questions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.09936, 2023.
  20. Gqa: A new dataset for real-world visual reasoning and compositional question answering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 6700–6709, 2019.
  21. Openclip, July 2021. If you use this software, please cite it as below.
  22. Deep visual-semantic alignments for generating image descriptions. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3128–3137, 2015.
  23. A diagram is worth a dozen images. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11–14, 2016, Proceedings, Part IV 14, pages 235–251. Springer, 2016.
  24. Segment anything. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.02643, 2023.
  25. Pix2struct: Screenshot parsing as pretraining for visual language understanding. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 18893–18912. PMLR, 2023.
  26. Otterhd: A high-resolution multi-modality model, 2023.
  27. Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models. In International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2023, 23-29 July 2023, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, volume 202 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 19730–19742. PMLR, 2023.
  28. Evaluating object hallucination in large vision-language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10355, 2023.
  29. Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03744, 2023.
  30. Visual instruction tuning. 2023.
  31. Mmbench: Is your multi-modal model an all-around player? arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.06281, 2023.
  32. On the hidden mystery of ocr in large multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.07895, 2023.
  33. Decoupled weight decay regularization. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017.
  34. Unified-io: A unified model for vision, language, and multi-modal tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.08916, 2022.
  35. Learn to explain: Multimodal reasoning via thought chains for science question answering. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:2507–2521, 2022.
  36. Ok-vqa: A visual question answering benchmark requiring external knowledge. In Proceedings of the IEEE/cvf conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3195–3204, 2019.
  37. Chartqa: A benchmark for question answering about charts with visual and logical reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.10244, 2022.
  38. Infographicvqa. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pages 1697–1706, 2022.
  39. Docvqa: A dataset for vqa on document images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision, pages 2200–2209, 2021.
  40. Ocr-vqa: Visual question answering by reading text in images. In 2019 international conference on document analysis and recognition (ICDAR), pages 947–952. IEEE, 2019.
  41. OpenAI. ChatGPT. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/, 2023.
  42. OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report, 2023.
  43. Compositional semantic parsing on semi-structured tables. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.00305, 2015.
  44. Kosmos-2: Grounding multimodal large language models to the world. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.14824, 2023.
  45. Laion-5b: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:25278–25294, 2022.
  46. Conceptual captions: A cleaned, hypernymed, image alt-text dataset for automatic image captioning. In Iryna Gurevych and Yusuke Miyao, editors, Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 2556–2565, Melbourne, Australia, July 2018. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  47. Textcaps: a dataset for image captioning with reading comprehension, 2020.
  48. Towards vqa models that can read. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8317–8326, 2019.
  49. Kleister: key information extraction datasets involving long documents with complex layouts. In International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, pages 564–579. Springer, 2021.
  50. S Svetlichnaya. Deepform: Understand structured documents at scale, 2020.
  51. Visualmrc: Machine reading comprehension on document images. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 35, pages 13878–13888, 2021.
  52. On the general value of evidence, and bilingual scene-text visual question answering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10126–10135, 2020.
  53. Grit: A generative region-to-text transformer for object understanding, 2022.
  54. Lvlm-ehub: A comprehensive evaluation benchmark for large vision-language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09265, 2023.
  55. mplug-owl: Modularization empowers large language models with multimodality. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.14178, 2023.
  56. mplug-owl2: Revolutionizing multi-modal large language model with modality collaboration, 2023.
  57. From image descriptions to visual denotations: New similarity metrics for semantic inference over event descriptions. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2:67–78, 2014.
  58. Mm-vet: Evaluating large multimodal models for integrated capabilities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.02490, 2023.
  59. Minigpt-4: Enhancing vision-language understanding with advanced large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10592, 2023.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (9)
  1. Zhang Li (26 papers)
  2. Biao Yang (48 papers)
  3. Qiang Liu (405 papers)
  4. Zhiyin Ma (5 papers)
  5. Shuo Zhang (256 papers)
  6. Jingxu Yang (1 paper)
  7. Yabo Sun (3 papers)
  8. Yuliang Liu (82 papers)
  9. Xiang Bai (222 papers)
Citations (167)
View on Semantic Scholar
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

YouTube