Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
194 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

On the tractability of Nash equilibrium (2311.05644v3)

Published 6 Nov 2023 in math.OC and cs.GT

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a method for solving a PPAD-complete problem [Papadimitriou, 1994]. Given is the payoff matrix $C$ of a symmetric bimatrix game $(C, CT)$ and our goal is to compute a Nash equilibrium of $(C, CT)$. In this paper, we devise a nonlinear replicator dynamic (whose right-hand-side can be obtained by solving a pair of convex optimization problems) with the following property: Under any invertible $0 < C \leq 1$, every orbit of our dynamic starting at an interior strategy of the standard simplex approaches a set of strategies of $(C, CT)$ such that, for each strategy in this set, a symmetric Nash equilibrium strategy can be computed by solving the aforementioned convex mathematical programs. We prove convergence using results in analysis (the analytic implicit function theorem), nonlinear optimization theory (duality theory, Berge's maximum principle, and a theorem of Robinson [1980] on the Lipschitz continuity of parametric nonlinear programs), and dynamical systems theory (such as the LaSalle invariance principle).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (19)
  1. The multiplicative weights update method: A meta-algorithm and its applications. Theory of Computing, 8:121–164, 2012.
  2. I. Avramopoulos. Computational principles manifesting in learning symmetric equilibria by exponentiated dynamics. SSRN preprint https://ssrn.com/abstract=4425843, 2023.
  3. I. Avramopoulos and N. Vasiloglou. On algorithmically boosting fixed-point computations. arXiv eprint 2304.04665 (cs.GT), 2023.
  4. Convex Analysis and Optimization. Athena Scientific, 2003.
  5. Settling the complexity of computing two-player Nash equilibria. Journal of the ACM, 56(3), 2009.
  6. The complexity of computing a Nash equilibrium. SIAM J. Comput., 39(1):195–259, 2009.
  7. G. Giorgi and C. Zucottti. A tutorial on sensitivity and stability in nonlinear programming and variational inequalities under differentiability assumptions. Dem working paper series #159 (06-18), Department of Economics and Management, University of Pavia, 2018.
  8. H. K. Khalil. Nonlinear Systems. Prentice Hall, third edition, 2002.
  9. Playing large games using simple strategies. In Proc. EC’03, pages 36–41, 2003.
  10. An impossibility theorem in game dynamics. PNAS, 120(41), 2023.
  11. J. F. Nash. Equilibrium points in n𝑛nitalic_n-person games. PNAS, 36(1), Jan. 1950.
  12. J. F. Nash. Non-cooperative games. The Annals of Mathematics, Second Series, 54(2):286–295, Sept. 1951.
  13. C. H. Papadimitriou. On the complexity of the parity argument and other inefficient proofs of existence. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 48(3):498–532, 1994.
  14. Beyond time-average convergence: Near-optimal uncoupled online learning via claivoyant multiplicative weights update. arXiv eprint 2111.14737 (cs.GT), 2022.
  15. S. M. Robinson. Strongly regular generalized equations. Mathematics of Operations Research, 5:43–62, 1980.
  16. W. H. Sandholm. Population Games and Evolutionary Dynamics. MIT Press, 2010.
  17. R. Savani and B. von Stengel. Exponentially many steps for finding a Nash equilibrium in a bimatrix game. In Proc. 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 258–267, 2004.
  18. H. Tsaknakis and P. G. Spirakis. An optimization approach for approximate Nash equilibria. Internet Mathematics, 5(4):365–382, 2009.
  19. J. W. Weibull. Evolutionary Game Theory. MIT Press, 1995.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com