Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Weight-Sharing Regularization (2311.03096v2)

Published 6 Nov 2023 in cs.LG and stat.ML

Abstract: Weight-sharing is ubiquitous in deep learning. Motivated by this, we propose a "weight-sharing regularization" penalty on the weights $w \in \mathbb{R}d$ of a neural network, defined as $\mathcal{R}(w) = \frac{1}{d - 1}\sum_{i > j}d |w_i - w_j|$. We study the proximal mapping of $\mathcal{R}$ and provide an intuitive interpretation of it in terms of a physical system of interacting particles. We also parallelize existing algorithms for $\operatorname{prox}_\mathcal{R}$ (to run on GPU) and find that one of them is fast in practice but slow ($O(d)$) for worst-case inputs. Using the physical interpretation, we design a novel parallel algorithm which runs in $O(\log3 d)$ when sufficient processors are available, thus guaranteeing fast training. Our experiments reveal that weight-sharing regularization enables fully connected networks to learn convolution-like filters even when pixels have been shuffled while convolutional neural networks fail in this setting. Our code is available on github.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (27)
  1. An O(n log n) sorting network. In Proceedings of the fifteenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pp.  1–9, 1983.
  2. Efficient implementations of the generalized lasso dual path algorithm. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 25(1):1–27, 2016.
  3. On perturbed proximal gradient algorithms. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 18(1):310–342, 2017.
  4. Active set algorithms for isotonic regression; a unifying framework. Mathematical Programming, 47(1-3):425–439, 1990.
  5. Iterative thresholding for sparse approximations. Journal of Fourier analysis and Applications, 14:629–654, 2008.
  6. Frank H Clarke. Optimization and nonsmooth analysis. SIAM, 1990.
  7. Group equivariant convolutional networks. In International conference on machine learning, pp. 2990–2999. PMLR, 2016.
  8. Richard Cole. Parallel merge sort. SIAM Journal on Computing, 17(4):770–785, 1988.
  9. The elements of statistical learning. springer series in statistics. New York, NY, USA, 2001.
  10. Keeping the neural networks simple by minimizing the description length of the weights. In Proceedings of the sixth annual conference on Computational learning theory, pp.  5–13, 1993.
  11. An approach to parallelizing isotonic regression. In Applied Mathematics and Parallel Computing: Festschrift for Klaus Ritter, pp.  141–147. Springer, 1996.
  12. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. 2009.
  13. Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition. Neural computation, 1(4):541–551, 1989.
  14. Efficient sparse semismooth newton methods for the clustered lasso problem. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 29(3):2026–2052, 2019.
  15. Behnam Neyshabur. Towards learning convolutions from scratch. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pp.  8078–8088, 2020.
  16. Equivariance through parameter-sharing. In International conference on machine learning, pp. 2892–2901. PMLR, 2017.
  17. Jorma Rissanen et al. Information and complexity in statistical modeling, volume 152. Springer, 2007.
  18. John Shawe-Taylor. Building symmetries into feedforward networks. In Artificial Neural Networks, 1989., First IEE International Conference on (Conf. Publ. No. 313), pp.  158–162. IET, 1989.
  19. Yiyuan She. Sparse regression with exact clustering. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 4:1055 – 1096, 2010.
  20. Sparsity and smoothness via the fused lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 67(1):91–108, 2005.
  21. The solution path of the generalized lasso. The Annals of Statistics, 39(3):1335 – 1371, 2011.
  22. Soft weight-sharing for neural network compression. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.04008, 2017.
  23. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  24. Equivariance discovery by learned parameter-sharing. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp.  1527–1545. PMLR, 2022.
  25. Yao-Liang Yu. On decomposing the proximal map. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 26, 2013.
  26. Meta-learning symmetries by reparameterization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.02933, 2020.
  27. spred: Solving l1 penalty with SGD. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 202, pp.  43407–43422. PMLR, 2023.
Citations (2)

Summary

  • The paper introduces weight-sharing regularization, a technique that enforces similar weight values across network components to mitigate overfitting.
  • It rigorously derives the proximal mapping of the regularization function using a physical analogy and adapts parallel algorithms for GPU efficiency.
  • Empirical results show that the method enables fully connected networks to learn convolution-like filters, even under pixel permutation challenges.

An Expert Overview of "Weight-Sharing Regularization"

The paper "Weight-Sharing Regularization" discusses a novel regularization technique for neural networks that encourages the sharing of weights across different components of the network. This method, termed weight-sharing regularization, introduces a penalty on the network's weights, defined specifically as R(w)=1d1i>jdwiwj\mathcal{R}(w) = \frac{1}{d-1}\sum_{i > j}^d |w_i - w_j|. This regularization is inspired by the widespread adoption of weight-sharing mechanisms in deep learning architectures such as CNNs and transformers.

Key Contributions

The paper makes several technical contributions of note:

  1. Proximal Mapping of R\mathcal{R}: The authors rigorously derive the proximal mapping for the weight-sharing regularization function R\mathcal{R}. They employ a physical analogy using a system of interacting particles to provide an intuitive understanding of the proximal operation. This perspective not only illuminates the conceptual framework behind the regularization but also aids in algorithm development.
  2. Parallel Algorithms: The authors provide parallel adaptations of existing algorithms for computing $\prox_{\mathcal{R}}$, adapted for execution on modern GPU architectures. One resulting algorithm achieves a depth of O(log3d)O(\log^3 d) with sufficient computational resources, highlighting potential efficiency improvements for large-scale models.
  3. Learning Convolution-like Filters: Experimentally, weight-sharing regularization demonstrated the capability of enabling fully connected networks to learn convolution-like filters. This ability was particularly evident even under pixel permutations, where traditional convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were unable to discern such patterns.

The contributions also extend to the empirical validation of the introduced concept across well-known benchmarks, such as MNIST and CIFAR10, demonstrating practical improvements in learning and generalization.

Implications and Future Directions

The introduction of weight-sharing regularization presents significant implications for both theoretical research and practical implementations in machine learning:

  • Generalization Performance: By enforcing similarity among weights, the regularization technique holds promise for combating overfitting in fully connected neural networks—a common challenge that typically requires heuristic or architecture-specific solutions like dropout.
  • Architecture-Independent Learning: The ability to learn convolution-like structures without explicit architectural constraints opens new avenues for generic architectures to self-discover efficient connectivity patterns, fostering potential advancements in neural architecture search (NAS).

In future research, it could be beneficial to explore different forms and generalizations of the weight-sharing penalty, particularly in multi-dimensional cases or where other weight correlation structures are desired. Additionally, the balance between computational efficiency and model accuracy will likely be a focal point, especially for handling large-scale datasets and models. Implementations of these algorithms in various deep learning frameworks can lead to broader community adoption, stimulating further exploration and optimization.

In conclusion, the exploration and successful application of weight-sharing regularization represent a notable advancement in the field of regularization techniques, promising to enhance the flexibility and performance of neural network models in a variety of learning tasks.