Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Local Max-Cut on Sparse Graphs (2311.00182v3)

Published 31 Oct 2023 in cs.DS

Abstract: We bound the smoothed running time of the FLIP algorithm for local Max-Cut as a function of $\alpha$, the arboricity of the input graph. We show that, with high probability and in expectation, the following holds (where $n$ is the number of nodes and $\phi$ is the smoothing parameter): 1) When $\alpha = O(\log{1-\delta} n)$ FLIP terminates in $\phi poly(n)$ iterations, where $\delta \in (0,1]$ is an arbitrarily small constant. Previous to our results the only graph families for which FLIP was known to achieve a smoothed polynomial running time were complete graphs and graphs with logarithmic maximum degree. 2) For arbitrary values of $\alpha$ we get a running time of $\phi n{O(\frac{\alpha}{\log n} + \log \alpha)}$. This improves over the best known running time for general graphs of $\phi n{O(\sqrt{ \log n })}$ for $\alpha = o(\log{1.5} n)$. Specifically, when $\alpha = O(\log n)$ we get a significantly faster running time of $\phi n{O(\log \log n)}$.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (13)
  1. Local max-cut in smoothed polynomial time. In STOC, pages 429–437. ACM, 2017.
  2. Emergence of scaling in random networks. science, 286(5439):509–512, 1999.
  3. Improving the smoothed complexity of FLIP for max cut problems. ACM Trans. Algorithms, 17(3):19:1–19:38, 2021.
  4. Smoothed complexity of local max-cut and binary max-csp. In STOC, pages 1052–1065. ACM, 2020.
  5. Testing bounded arboricity. ACM Trans. Algorithms, 16(2):18:1–18:22, 2020.
  6. Smoothed analysis of local search for the maximum-cut problem. ACM Trans. Algorithms, 13(2):25:1–25:12, 2017.
  7. Faster sublinear approximation of the number of k-cliques in low-arboricity graphs. In SODA, pages 1467–1478. SIAM, 2020.
  8. Settling the complexity of local max-cut (almost) completely. In ICALP (1), volume 6755 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 171–182. Springer, 2011.
  9. The complexity of pure nash equilibria. In STOC, pages 604–612. ACM, 2004.
  10. John J Hopfield. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 79(8):2554–2558, 1982.
  11. How easy is local search? J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 37(1):79–100, 1988.
  12. Smoothed analysis of algorithms: Why the simplex algorithm usually takes polynomial time. J. ACM, 51(3):385–463, 2004.
  13. Simple local search problems that are hard to solve. SIAM J. Comput., 20(1):56–87, 1991.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.