Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
116 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
10 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
3 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
55 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

MMM and MMMSynth: Clustering of heterogeneous tabular data, and synthetic data generation (2310.19454v2)

Published 30 Oct 2023 in cs.LG and stat.ML

Abstract: We provide new algorithms for two tasks relating to heterogeneous tabular datasets: clustering, and synthetic data generation. Tabular datasets typically consist of heterogeneous data types (numerical, ordinal, categorical) in columns, but may also have hidden cluster structure in their rows: for example, they may be drawn from heterogeneous (geographical, socioeconomic, methodological) sources, such that the outcome variable they describe (such as the presence of a disease) may depend not only on the other variables but on the cluster context. Moreover, sharing of biomedical data is often hindered by patient confidentiality laws, and there is current interest in algorithms to generate synthetic tabular data from real data, for example via deep learning. We demonstrate a novel EM-based clustering algorithm, MMM (``Madras Mixture Model''), that outperforms standard algorithms in determining clusters in synthetic heterogeneous data, and recovers structure in real data. Based on this, we demonstrate a synthetic tabular data generation algorithm, MMMsynth, that pre-clusters the input data, and generates cluster-wise synthetic data assuming cluster-specific data distributions for the input columns. We benchmark this algorithm by testing the performance of standard ML algorithms when they are trained on synthetic data and tested on real published datasets. Our synthetic data generation algorithm outperforms other literature tabular-data generators, and approaches the performance of training purely with real data.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (19)
  1. Modeling tabular data using conditional GAN. Advances in neural information processing systems. 2019;32.
  2. Sync: A copula based framework for generating synthetic data from aggregated sources. In: 2020 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW). IEEE; 2020. p. 571–578.
  3. Xu L, et al.. Synthesizing tabular data using conditional GAN; 2020.
  4. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. the Journal of machine Learning research. 2011;12:2825–2830.
  5. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ClusterR.
  6. Stukalov A, Lin D. Clustering.jl. Julia Statistics Available online at: https://githubcom/JuliaStats/Clusteringjl (accessed September 30, 2021). 2021;.
  7. MacKay DJ. Bayesian interpolation. Neural computation. 1992;4(3):415–447.
  8. Neath AA, Cavanaugh JE. The Bayesian information criterion: background, derivation, and applications. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics. 2012;4(2):199–203.
  9. Gelman A, Meng XL. Simulating normalizing constants: From importance sampling to bridge sampling to path sampling. Statistical science. 1998; p. 163–185.
  10. Lartillot N, Philippe H. Computing Bayes factors using thermodynamic integration. Systematic biology. 2006;55(2):195–207.
  11. Newton MA, Raftery AE. Approximate Bayesian inference with the weighted likelihood bootstrap. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology. 1994;56(1):3–26.
  12. Improving marginal likelihood estimation for Bayesian phylogenetic model selection. Systematic biology. 2011;60(2):150–160.
  13. Van Buuren S, Oudshoorn K. Flexible multivariate imputation by MICE; 1999.
  14. Murphy KP. Conjugate Bayesian analysis of the Gaussian distribution; 2007. https://www.cs.ubc.ca/~murphyk/Papers/bayesGauss.pdf.
  15. Hubert L, Arabie P. Comparing partitions. Journal of classification. 1985;2:193–218.
  16. Gagolewski M. GenieClust: Fast and robust hierarchical clustering. SoftwareX. 2021;15:100722.
  17. 4700. In: IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA); 2016. p. 399–410.
  18. UCI machine learning repository. 2017;.
  19. Gagolewski M. A framework for benchmarking clustering algorithms. SoftwareX. 2022;20:101270.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets