Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Probabilistic Sampling of Balanced K-Means using Adiabatic Quantum Computing (2310.12153v2)

Published 18 Oct 2023 in cs.LG, cs.AI, and cs.CV

Abstract: Adiabatic quantum computing (AQC) is a promising approach for discrete and often NP-hard optimization problems. Current AQCs allow to implement problems of research interest, which has sparked the development of quantum representations for many computer vision tasks. Despite requiring multiple measurements from the noisy AQC, current approaches only utilize the best measurement, discarding information contained in the remaining ones. In this work, we explore the potential of using this information for probabilistic balanced k-means clustering. Instead of discarding non-optimal solutions, we propose to use them to compute calibrated posterior probabilities with little additional compute cost. This allows us to identify ambiguous solutions and data points, which we demonstrate on a D-Wave AQC on synthetic tasks and real visual data.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (79)
  1. The power of quantum neural networks. Nature Computational Science, 1(6):403–409, 2021.
  2. Quantum clustering algorithms. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning - ICML ’07, pages 1–8, Corvalis, Oregon, 2007. ACM Press.
  3. Quantum Motion Segmentation. In Computer Vision – ECCV 2022, pages 506–523. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2022.
  4. Balanced k-means clustering on an adiabatic quantum computer. Quantum Information Processing, 20(9):294, 2021.
  5. Ising Models for Binary Clustering via Adiabatic Quantum Computing. In Energy Minimization Methods in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3–17, Cham, 2018. Springer International Publishing.
  6. Q-match: Iterative shape matching via quantum annealing. In 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 7566–7576, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2021. IEEE Computer Society.
  7. Adiabatic Quantum Graph Matching with Permutation Matrix Constraints. In 2020 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), pages 583–592, Fukuoka, Japan, 2020. IEEE.
  8. Simple Online and Realtime Tracking. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pages 3464–3468, 2016.
  9. CCuantuMM: Cycle-Consistent Quantum-Hybrid Matching of Multiple Shapes. In 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 1296–1305, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2023. IEEE.
  10. Realizable Hamiltonians for Universal Adiabatic Quantum Computers. Physical Review A, 78(1):012352, 2008.
  11. Probabilistic permutation synchronization using the riemannian structure of the birkhoff polytope. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 11105–11116, 2019.
  12. Quantum Permutation Synchronization. In 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 13117–13128, Nashville, TN, USA, 2021. IEEE.
  13. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, 2006.
  14. Beweis des Adiabatensatzes. Zeitschrift für Physik, 51(3):165–180, 1928.
  15. Architectural considerations in the design of a superconducting quantum annealing processor. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 24(4):1–10, 2014.
  16. Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features. In Computer Vision – ECCV 2018, pages 139–156. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018.
  17. A Probabilistic framework for Quantum Clustering, 2019.
  18. Probabilistic quantum clustering. Knowledge-Based Systems, 194:105567, 2020.
  19. A programmable qudit-based quantum processor. Nature Communications, 13(1):1166, 2022.
  20. Quantum Robust Fitting. In Computer Vision – ACCV 2020, pages 485–499. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021.
  21. Probabilistic 3D multi-modal, multi-object tracking for autonomous driving. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2021.
  22. Learning Feature Representations with K-Means. In Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade, pages 561–580. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012.
  23. Image segmentation by clustering. Proceedings of the IEEE, 67(5):773–785, 1979.
  24. Gregory F Cooper. The computational complexity of probabilistic inference using Bayesian belief networks. Artificial intelligence, 42(2-3):393–405, 1990.
  25. D-Wave Systems Inc. Performance advantage in quantum Boltzmann sampling. Technical report, D-Wave Systems Inc., 2017.
  26. Sanjoy Dasgupta. The hardness of k-means clustering. 2008.
  27. QUBO formulations for training machine learning models. Scientific Reports, 11(1):10029, 2021.
  28. Demonstration of a small programmable quantum computer with atomic qubits. Nature, 536(7614):63–66, 2016.
  29. Sequential monte carlo samplers. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 68(3):411–436, 2006.
  30. Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 39(1):1–22, 1977.
  31. Multi-Modal Trajectory Prediction of Surrounding Vehicles with Maneuver based LSTMs. In IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2018.
  32. Image Segmentation Using K -means Clustering Algorithm and Subtractive Clustering Algorithm. Procedia Computer Science, 54:764–771, 2015.
  33. Training Restricted Boltzmann Machines With a D-Wave Quantum Annealer. Frontiers in Physics, 9, 2021.
  34. A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Algorithm for Robust Fitting. In 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 417–427, New Orleans, LA, USA, 2022. IEEE.
  35. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review, 47(10):777–780, 1935.
  36. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 226–231, Portland, Oregon, 1996. AAAI Press.
  37. Quantum Multi-Model Fitting. In 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 13640–13649, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2023. IEEE.
  38. R. A. Fisher. The Use of Multiple Measurements in Taxonomic Problems. Annals of Eugenics, 7(2):179–188, 1936.
  39. E. Forgy. Cluster Analysis of Multivariate Data: Efficiency versus Interpretability of Classification. Biometrics, 21(3):768–769, 1965.
  40. A Method for Comparing Two Hierarchical Clusterings. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78(383):553–569, 1983.
  41. A survey on uncertainty quantification methods for deep neural networks: An uncertainty source perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13425, 2023.
  42. Person Re-identification by Descriptive and Discriminative Classification. In Image Analysis, pages 91–102. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011.
  43. The method of quantum clustering. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. MIT Press, 2001.
  44. Comparing partitions. Journal of Classification, 2(1):193–218, 1985.
  45. Ernst Ising. Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus. Zeitschrift für Physik, 31(1):253–258, 1925.
  46. Chiyu “Max” Jiang, Andre Cornman, Cheolho Park, Benjamin Sapp, Yin Zhou, and Dragomir Anguelov. MotionDiffuser: Controllable Multi-Agent Motion Prediction Using Diffusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 9644–9653, 2023.
  47. Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model. Physical Review E, 58(5):5355–5363, 1998.
  48. Motion Segmentation & Multiple Object Tracking by Correlation Co-Clustering. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 42(1):140–153, 2020.
  49. Projected stochastic gradient descent with quantum annealed binary gradients. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.15128, 2023.
  50. Quantum Annealing for Combinatorial Clustering. Quantum Information Processing, 17(2):39, 2018.
  51. Beyond Bags of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing Natural Scene Categories. In 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’06), pages 2169–2178, 2006.
  52. Stuart Lloyd. Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE transactions on information theory, 28(2):129–137, 1982a.
  53. S. Lloyd. Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 28(2):129–137, 1982b.
  54. James MacQueen et al. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pages 281–297. Oakland, CA, USA, 1967.
  55. The planar k-means problem is NP-hard. Theoretical Computer Science, 442:13–21, 2012.
  56. Balanced K-Means for Clustering. In Structural, Syntactic, and Statistical Pattern Recognition, pages 32–41. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2014.
  57. The Advantage System: Performance Update. Technical report, D-Wave Systems Inc., 2021.
  58. The D-Wave Advantage2 Prototype. Technical Report, 2022.
  59. UMAP: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. ArXiv e-prints, 2018.
  60. An Iterative Quantum Approach for Transformation Estimation from Point Sets. In 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 519–527, 2022.
  61. Hybrid quantum investment optimization with minimal holding period. Scientific Reports, 11(1):19587, 2021.
  62. Designing Peptides on a Quantum Computer, 2020.
  63. High-Quality Thermal Gibbs Sampling with Quantum Annealing Hardware. Physical Review Applied, 17(4):044046, 2022.
  64. Traffic Flow Optimization Using a Quantum Annealer. Frontiers in ICT, 4:29, 2017.
  65. Quantum Vision Clustering, 2023.
  66. Control of Automated Guided Vehicles Without Collision by Quantum Annealer and Digital Devices. Frontiers in Computer Science, 1:9, 2019.
  67. Learning to rank in person re-identification with metric ensembles. In 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 1846–1855, Boston, MA, USA, 2015. IEEE.
  68. On the challenges of using D-Wave computers to sample Boltzmann Random Variables, 2021.
  69. V-Measure: A Conditional Entropy-Based External Cluster Evaluation Measure. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL), pages 410–420, Prague, Czech Republic, 2007. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  70. E. Schrödinger. Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 31(4):555–563, 1935.
  71. Peter W. Shor. Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer. SIAM Review, 41(2):303–332, 1999.
  72. Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. arXiv:1409.1556 [cs], 2014.
  73. Mark M. Wilde. Quantum Information Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2 edition, 2017.
  74. Benchmarking an 11-qubit quantum computer. Nature Communications, 10(1):5464, 2019.
  75. Survey of clustering algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 16(3):645–678, 2005.
  76. Joint Unsupervised Learning of Deep Representations and Image Clusters. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 5147–5156, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2016. IEEE.
  77. Adiabatic Quantum Computing for Multi Object Tracking. In 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 8801–8812, New Orleans, LA, USA, 2022. IEEE.
  78. Spectral relaxation for k-means clustering. Advances in neural information processing systems, 14, 2001.
  79. Joint Discriminative and Generative Learning for Person Re-Identification. In 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 2133–2142, Long Beach, CA, USA, 2019. IEEE.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets