Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Reduced-Complexity Verification for K-Step and Infinite-Step Opacity in Discrete Event Systems (2310.11825v1)

Published 18 Oct 2023 in cs.FL

Abstract: Opacity is a property that captures security concerns in cyber-physical systems and its verification plays a significant role. This paper investigates the verifications of K-step and infinite-step weak and strong opacity for partially observed nondeterministic finite state automata. K-step weak opacity is checked by constructing, for some states in the observer, appropriate state-trees, to propose a necessary and sufficient condition. Based on the relation between K-step weak and infinite-step weak opacity, a condition that determines when a system is not infinite-step weak opaque is presented. Regarding K-step and infinite-step strong opacity, we develop a secret-involved projected automaton, based on which we construct secret-unvisited state trees to derive a necessary and sufficient condition for K-step strong opacity. Furthermore, an algorithm is reported to compute a verifier that can be used to obtain a necessary and sufficient condition for infinite-step strong opacity. It is argued that, in some particular cases, the proposed methods achieve reduced complexity compared with the state of the art.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. S. Lafortune, F. Lin, and C. N. Hadjicostis, “On the history of diagnosability and opacity in discrete event systems,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 45, pp. 257–266, 2018.
  2. R. Jacob, J.-J. Lesage, and J.-M. Faure, “Overview of discrete event systems opacity: Models, validation, and quantification,” Annual reviews in control, vol. 41, pp. 135–146, 2016.
  3. Y. Guo, X. Jiang, C. Guo, S. Wang, and O. Karoui, “Overview of opacity in discrete event systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 48 731–48 741, 2020.
  4. X. Han, K. Zhang, J. Zhang, Z. Li, and Z. Chen, “Strong current-state and initial-state opacity of discrete-event systems,” Automatica, vol. 148, p. 110756, 2023.
  5. X. Yin, Z. Li, W. Wang, and S. Li, “Infinite-step opacity and K𝐾{K}italic_K-step opacity of stochastic discrete-event systems,” Automatica, vol. 99, pp. 266–274, 2019.
  6. F. Lin, “Opacity of discrete event systems and its applications,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 496–503, 2011.
  7. A. Saboori and C. N. Hadjicostis, “Verification of K𝐾{K}italic_K-step opacity and analysis of its complexity,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 549–559, 2011.
  8. A. Saboori and C. N. Hadjicostis, “Verification of infinite-step opacity and complexity considerations,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1265–1269, 2012.
  9. A. Saboori and C. N. Hadjicostis, “Verification of initial-state opacity in security applications of discrete event systems,” Information Sciences, vol. 246, pp. 115–132, 2013.
  10. Y. Falcone and H. Marchand, “Enforcement and validation (at runtime) of various notions of opacity,” Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 531–570, 2015.
  11. X. Yin and S. Lafortune, “A new approach for the verification of infinite-step and K𝐾{K}italic_K-step opacity using two-way observers,” Automatica, vol. 80, pp. 162–171, 2017.
  12. J. Balun and T. Masopust, “Comparing the notions of opacity for discrete-event systems,” Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 553–582, 2021.
  13. Z. Ma, X. Yin, and Z. Li, “Verification and enforcement of strong infinite- and K𝐾{K}italic_K-step opacity using state recognizers,” Automatica, vol. 133, p. 109838, 2021.
  14. Y. Tong, H. Lan, and C. Seatzu, “Verification of K𝐾{K}italic_K-step and infinite-step opacity of bounded labeled Petri nets,” Automatica, vol. 140, p. 110221, 2022.
  15. A. Wintenberg, M. Blischke, S. Lafortune, and N. Ozay, “A general language-based framework for specifying and verifying notions of opacity,” Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, vol. 32, pp. 253–289, 2022.
  16. X. Yin and S. Li, “Synthesis of dynamic masks for infinite-step opacity,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 1429–1441, 2020.
  17. Y.-C. Wu and S. Lafortune, “Synthesis of insertion functions for enforcement of opacity security properties,” Automatica, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1336–1348, 2014.
  18. R. Liu and J. Lu, “Enforcement for infinite-step opacity and K𝐾{K}italic_K-step opacity via insertion mechanism,” Automatica, vol. 140, p. 110212, 2022.
  19. C. Keroglou and S. Lafortune, “Embedded insertion functions for opacity enforcement,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 4184–4191, 2021.
  20. X. Li, C. N. Hadjicostis, and Z. Li, “Extended insertion functions for opacity enforcement in discrete event systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 5289–5303, 2022.
  21. Y. Ji and S. Lafortune, “Enforcing opacity by publicly known edit functions,” in 56th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2017.
  22. X. Li, C. N. Hadjicostis, and Z. Li, “Opacity enforcement in discrete event systems using extended insertion functions under inserted language constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 68, no. 11, pp. 1–8, 2023.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now