Gaining Wisdom from Setbacks: Aligning Large Language Models via Mistake Analysis (2310.10477v6)
Abstract: The rapid development of LLMs has not only provided numerous opportunities but also presented significant challenges. This becomes particularly evident when LLMs inadvertently generate harmful or toxic content, either unintentionally or because of intentional inducement. Existing alignment methods usually direct LLMs toward the favorable outcomes by utilizing human-annotated, flawless instruction-response pairs. Conversely, this study proposes a novel alignment technique based on mistake analysis, which deliberately exposes LLMs to erroneous content to learn the reasons for mistakes and how to avoid them. In this case, mistakes are repurposed into valuable data for alignment, effectively helping to avoid the production of erroneous responses. Without external models or human annotations, our method leverages a model's intrinsic ability to discern undesirable mistakes and improves the safety of its generated responses. Experimental results reveal that our method outperforms existing alignment approaches in enhancing model safety while maintaining the overall utility.
- Kai Chen (512 papers)
- Chunwei Wang (13 papers)
- Kuo Yang (21 papers)
- Jianhua Han (49 papers)
- Lanqing Hong (72 papers)
- Fei Mi (56 papers)
- Hang Xu (204 papers)
- Zhengying Liu (26 papers)
- Wenyong Huang (12 papers)
- Zhenguo Li (195 papers)
- Dit-Yan Yeung (78 papers)
- Lifeng Shang (90 papers)
- Xin Jiang (242 papers)
- Qun Liu (230 papers)