Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
133 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Impact of Data Synthesis Strategies for the Classification of Craniosynostosis (2310.10199v1)

Published 16 Oct 2023 in eess.IV

Abstract: Introduction: Photogrammetric surface scans provide a radiation-free option to assess and classify craniosynostosis. Due to the low prevalence of craniosynostosis and high patient restrictions, clinical data is rare. Synthetic data could support or even replace clinical data for the classification of craniosynostosis, but this has never been studied systematically. Methods: We test the combinations of three different synthetic data sources: a statistical shape model (SSM), a generative adversarial network (GAN), and image-based principal component analysis for a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based classification of craniosynostosis. The CNN is trained only on synthetic data, but validated and tested on clinical data. Results: The combination of a SSM and a GAN achieved an accuracy of more than 0.96 and a F1-score of more than 0.95 on the unseen test set. The difference to training on clinical data was smaller than 0.01. Including a second image modality improved classification performance for all data sources. Conclusion: Without a single clinical training sample, a CNN was able to classify head deformities as accurate as if it was trained on clinical data. Using multiple data sources was key for a good classification based on synthetic data alone. Synthetic data might play an important future role in the assessment of craniosynostosis.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (36)
  1. A population-based study of craniosynostosis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43(1):69–73, January 1990.
  2. Virchow and the Pathogenesis of Craniosynostosis: A Translation of His Original Work. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 83(4):738–742, April 1989.
  3. Unravelling the molecular control of calvarial suture fusion in children with craniosynostosis. BMC Genomics, 8(1):458, December 2007.
  4. A population-based study of craniosynostosis in metropolitan Atlanta, 1989–2003. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 146A(8):984–991, April 2008.
  5. Intracranial pressure in craniostenosis. Journal of Neurosurgery, 57(3):370–377, September 1982.
  6. Neurodevelopment of children with single suture craniosynostosis: A review. Child’s Nervous System, 23(3):269–281, January 2007.
  7. Single Sutural Craniosynostoses: Surgical Outcomes and Long-Term Growth:. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 123(2):635–642, February 2009.
  8. Comparison of Black Bone MRI and 3D-CT in the preoperative evaluation of patients with craniosynostosis. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 73(4):723–731, April 2020.
  9. Fully automatic smartphone-based photogrammetric 3D modelling of infant’s heads for cranial deformation analysis. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 166:268–277, August 2020.
  10. A statistical shape model of craniosynostosis patients and 100 model instances of each pathology, November 2021.
  11. A Bi-atrial Statistical Shape Model as a Basis to Classify Left Atrial Enlargement from Simulated and Clinical 12-Lead ECGs. In Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. Multi-Disease, Multi-View, and Multi-Center Right Ventricular Segmentation in Cardiac MRI Challenge, volume 13131, pages 38–47. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022.
  12. Using Machine Learning to Characterize Atrial Fibrotic Substrate From Intracardiac Signals With a Hybrid in silico and in vivo Dataset. Frontiers in Physiology, 12:699291, July 2021.
  13. Personalized assessment of craniosynostosis via statistical shape modeling. Medical Image Analysis, 18(4):635–646, May 2014.
  14. Automatic detection and monitoring of abnormal skull shape in children with deformational plagiocephaly using deep learning. Scientific Reports, 11(1):17970, September 2021.
  15. Combining deep learning with 3D stereophotogrammetry for craniosynostosis diagnosis. Scientific Reports, 10(1):15346, December 2020.
  16. A Radiation-Free Classification Pipeline for Craniosynostosis Using Statistical Shape Modeling. Diagnostics, 12(7):1516, June 2022.
  17. 3D-2D Distance Maps Conversion Enhances Classification of Craniosynostosis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, pages 1–10, 2023.
  18. A new method for three-dimensional evaluation of the cranial shape and the automatic identification of craniosynostosis using 3D stereophotogrammetry. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 46(7):819–826, July 2017.
  19. Statistical shape modelling to aid surgical planning: Associations between surgical parameters and head shapes following spring-assisted cranioplasty. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 12(10):1739–1749, October 2017.
  20. Statistical shape modelling for the analysis of head shape variations. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 49(6):449–455, June 2021.
  21. Generative Adversarial Networks, June 2014.
  22. Actual Impact of GAN Augmentation on CNN Classification Performance:. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods, pages 15–23, Prague, Czech Republic, 2019. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications.
  23. MeshLab: An Open-Source Mesh Processing Tool. Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference, page 8 pages, 2008.
  24. Almost Isometric Mesh Parameterization through Abstract Domains. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(4):621–635, July 2010.
  25. A 3D Morphable Model of Craniofacial Shape and Texture Variation. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 3104–3112, Venice, October 2017. IEEE.
  26. Augmenting a 3D morphable model of the human head with high resolution ears. Pattern Recognition Letters, 128:378–384, December 2019.
  27. Statistical Modeling of Craniofacial Shape and Texture. International Journal of Computer Vision, 128(2):547–571, February 2020.
  28. Conditional Generative Adversarial Nets, November 2014.
  29. Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks, January 2016.
  30. Wasserstein GAN, December 2017.
  31. Improved Training of Wasserstein GANs, December 2017.
  32. Generative-Adversarial-Network-Based Data Augmentation for the Classification of Craniosynostosis. Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering, 8(2):17–20, August 2022.
  33. Towards Principled Methods for Training Generative Adversarial Networks, January 2017.
  34. Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In Advances in neural information processing systems 32, pages 8024–8035. Curran Associates, Inc., 2019.
  35. GAN, PCA, and Statistical Shape Models for the Creaiton of Synthetic Craniosynostosis Distance Maps, July 2023.
  36. Classification of Craniosynostosis Images by Vigilant Feature Extraction. In Advances in Computer Vision and Computational Biology, pages 293–306. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.