Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Reward-Augmented Decoding: Efficient Controlled Text Generation With a Unidirectional Reward Model (2310.09520v4)

Published 14 Oct 2023 in cs.CL

Abstract: While LLMs have proven effective in a huge range of downstream applications, they often generate text that is problematic or lacks a desired attribute. In this paper, we introduce Reward-Augmented Decoding (RAD), a text generation procedure that uses a small unidirectional reward model to encourage a LLM to generate text that has certain properties. Specifically, RAD uses the reward model to score generations as they are produced and rescales sampling probabilities to favor high-reward tokens. By using a unidirectional reward model, RAD can cache activations from prior generation steps to decrease computational overhead. Through experiments on generating non-toxic and sentiment-controlled text, we demonstrate that RAD performs best among methods that change only the generation procedure and matches the performance of state-of-the-art methods that involve re-training the LLM. We further validate that RAD is effective on very LLMs while incurring a minimal computational overhead.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (35)
  1. Systematic rectification of language models via dead-end analysis. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations.
  2. Which discriminator for cooperative text generation? In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM.
  3. Hierarchical neural story generation. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 889–898, Melbourne, Australia. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  4. RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating neural toxic degeneration in language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, pages 3356–3369, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  5. Aaron Gokaslan and Vanya Cohen. 2019. Openwebtext corpus. http://Skylion007.github.io/OpenWebTextCorpus.
  6. Don’t stop pretraining: Adapt language models to domains and tasks. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 8342–8360, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  7. Training compute-optimal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.15556.
  8. Learning to write with cooperative discriminators. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1638–1649, Melbourne, Australia. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  9. Scaling laws for neural language models.
  10. Ctrl: A conditional transformer language model for controllable generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.05858.
  11. Critic-guided decoding for controlled text generation. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pages 4598–4612, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  12. GeDi: Generative discriminator guided sequence generation. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021, pages 4929–4952, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  13. The power of scale for parameter-efficient prompt tuning. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 3045–3059, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  14. A diversity-promoting objective function for neural conversation models. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 110–119, San Diego, California. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  15. Delete, retrieve, generate: a simple approach to sentiment and style transfer. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), pages 1865–1874, New Orleans, Louisiana. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  16. Xiang Lisa Li and Percy Liang. 2021. Prefix-tuning: Optimizing continuous prompts for generation. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 4582–4597, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  17. DExperts: Decoding-time controlled text generation with experts and anti-experts. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 6691–6706, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  18. Generating wikipedia by summarizing long sequences. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
  19. Quark: Controllable text generation with reinforced unlearning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:27591–27609.
  20. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:27730–27744.
  21. A plug-and-play method for controlled text generation. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021, pages 3973–3997, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  22. On the challenges of using black-box apis for toxicity evaluation in research. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.12397.
  23. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training.
  24. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners.
  25. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 1(8):9.
  26. Scaling language models: Methods, analysis & insights from training gopher. ArXiv, abs/2112.11446.
  27. Bloom: A 176b-parameter open-access multilingual language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.05100.
  28. Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347.
  29. What makes a good conversation? how controllable attributes affect human judgments. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 1702–1723, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  30. Classifiers are better experts for controllable text generation.
  31. Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1631–1642, Seattle, Washington, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  32. “transforming” delete, retrieve, generate approach for controlled text style transfer. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 3269–3279, Hong Kong, China. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  33. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. ArXiv, abs/2302.13971.
  34. Universal adversarial triggers for attacking and analyzing NLP. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 2153–2162, Hong Kong, China. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  35. Kevin Yang and Dan Klein. 2021. FUDGE: Controlled text generation with future discriminators. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 3511–3535, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Haikang Deng (3 papers)
  2. Colin Raffel (83 papers)
Citations (27)

Summary

  • The paper presents RAD, which integrates a unidirectional reward model to adjust text generation without retraining large language models.
  • RAD leverages caching and top-k sampling to minimize computational overhead while enhancing detoxification and sentiment control.
  • Empirical evaluations on large-scale LLaMA models demonstrate that RAD efficiently balances output control and computational cost.

An Analysis of Reward-Augmented Decoding for Controlled Text Generation

The paper "Reward-Augmented Decoding: Efficient Controlled Text Generation With a Unidirectional Reward Model," presents an innovative approach to controlled text generation that does not require retraining a LLM. Instead, the authors propose a method called Reward-Augmented Decoding (RAD), which employs a unidirectional reward model to evaluate and steer text generation in real-time, effectively mitigating the computational and cost burdens associated with further training of LLMs.

The significance of this work lies in its ability to bridge the performance gap between standard weighted decoding techniques and methods involving substantial retraining of the model, such as DAPT and PPO. RAD introduces a minimal computational footprint by leveraging a smaller, unidirectional reward model that uses caching techniques. This allows for efficient computation of reward adjustments in a manner that minimizes computational overhead.

Key Contributions and Methodology

The paper's primary contribution is the RAD technique, which integrates a unidirectional reward model within the decoding process of LLMs. This reward model assesses the generated text against a specified attribute, such as non-toxicity or sentiment, and adjusts the token probabilities to favor those aligning with the desired attribute. This adjustment is done using a top-k sampling strategy where the probabilities are rescaled based on the reward scores.

RAD's efficiency stems from its unidirectionality; it caches activations from prior steps, thereby reducing overhead. The reward model is a smaller transformer model adapted to predict attribute-specific scores, thus ensuring it operates with manageable computational complexity even when applied to very large LLMs, such as LLaMA models with up to 65 billion parameters.

Numerical Results and Empirical Evaluation

Empirically, the RAD method demonstrates superior control over generated text attributes compared to existing decoding techniques. In detoxification tasks, RAD outperforms weighted decoding methods like GeDi and DExperts, and performs comparably to retraining strategies without incurring their computational expenses. Furthermore, in sentiment-controlled generation, RAD achieves a high alignment with desired sentiment outputs while maintaining fluency and diversity in the text.

The performance evaluation extends to several settings, including deployment on large-scale LLaMA LLMs, where RAD sustains its effectiveness and induces minimal additional computational cost. These results underscore RAD's potential as a scalable and economical solution for controlled text generation in practical applications.

Implications and Future Research Directions

The RAD method brings forth practical and theoretical implications for the use of LLMs in scenarios requiring specific output attributes. Practically, RAD offers a method to enhance safety and user alignment in AI text systems without the extensive costs of model retraining. Theoretically, it opens avenues for further research into efficient control mechanisms within generation processes, potentially expanding to tasks requiring more complex control or multi-attribute alignment.

The paper suggests directions for future work, notably the application of RAD to more sophisticated tasks such as instruction following, where reward models could guide complex conditional generation tasks. Another promising area is enhancing reward models through better architectural choices or by combining multiple smaller models.

In conclusion, RAD represents a substantial stride towards efficient, controlled text generation, providing a modular and adaptive solution capable of integrating with existing LLMs without necessitating costly retraining interventions. The approach outlined in this paper positions itself as a viable strategy for improved real-time control over text generation in deployed AI systems.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com