Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Impact of Stricter Content Moderation on Parler's Users' Discourse (2310.08844v1)

Published 13 Oct 2023 in cs.SI and cs.CY

Abstract: Social media platforms employ various content moderation techniques to remove harmful, offensive, and hate speech content. The moderation level varies across platforms; even over time, it can evolve in a platform. For example, Parler, a fringe social media platform popular among conservative users, was known to have the least restrictive moderation policies, claiming to have open discussion spaces for their users. However, after linking the 2021 US Capitol Riots and the activity of some groups on Parler, such as QAnon and Proud Boys, on January 12, 2021, Parler was removed from the Apple and Google App Store and suspended from Amazon Cloud hosting service. Parler would have to modify their moderation policies to return to these online stores. After a month of downtime, Parler was back online with a new set of user guidelines, which reflected stricter content moderation, especially regarding the \emph{hate speech} policy. In this paper, we studied the moderation changes performed by Parler and their effect on the toxicity of its content. We collected a large longitudinal Parler dataset with 17M parleys from 432K active users from February 2021 to January 2022, after its return to the Internet and App Store. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the effectiveness of content moderation techniques using data-driven approaches and also the first Parler dataset after its brief hiatus. Our quasi-experimental time series analysis indicates that after the change in Parler's moderation, the severe forms of toxicity (above a threshold of 0.5) immediately decreased and sustained. In contrast, the trend did not change for less severe threats and insults (a threshold between 0.5 - 0.7). Finally, we found an increase in the factuality of the news sites being shared, as well as a decrease in the number of conspiracy or pseudoscience sources being shared.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (92)
  1. 2020. Parler, MeWe, Gab gain momentum as conservative social media alternatives in post-Trump age. https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2020/11/11/parler-mewe-gab-social-media-trump-election-facebook-twitter/6232351002/.
  2. 2021. Left vs. right bias: How we rate the bias of media sources. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/left-vs-right-bias-how-we-rate-the-bias-of-media-sources/
  3. 2022a. About MBFC. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/about/
  4. 2022. From the flag-bearer for free speech to ‘scapegoat’, Parler is fighting back. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/from-the-flag-bearer-for-free-speech-to-scapegoat-parler-is-fighting-back-bmwcdfgf5.
  5. 2022b. Methodology. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/methodology/
  6. Most Americans Think Social Media Sites Censor Political Viewpoints. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/08/19/most-americans-think-social-media-sites-censor-political-viewpoints/
  7. Understanding the Bystander Effect on Toxic Twitter Conversations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.10764 (2022).
  8. Understanding the Effect of Deplatforming on Social Networks. In 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021. 187–195.
  9. An early look at the parler online social network. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.03820 (2021).
  10. A Large Open Dataset from the Parler Social Network. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 15. 943–951.
  11. Toxic talk: How online incivility can undermine perceptions of media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 30, 1 (2016), 156–168.
  12. # Scamdemic,# plandemic, or# scaredemic: What parler social media platform tells us about COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccines 9, 5 (2021), 421.
  13. Finding Qs: Profiling QAnon supporters on Parler. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 17. 34–46.
  14. Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. International journal of epidemiology 46, 1 (2017), 348–355.
  15. 4chan and/b: An Analysis of Anonymity and Ephemerality in a Large Online Community. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, Vol. 5. 50–57.
  16. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of machine Learning research 3, Jan (2003), 993–1022.
  17. Alexandre Bovet and Hernán A Makse. 2019. Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election. Nature communications 10, 1 (2019), 7.
  18. Higher ground? How groundtruth labeling impacts our understanding of fake news about the 2016 US presidential nominees. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 14. 48–59.
  19. The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, 9 (2021), e2023301118.
  20. The COVID-19 social media infodemic. Scientific reports 10, 1 (2020), 1–10.
  21. Ben Collins. 2021. Increasingly militant ’parler refugees’ and Anxious Qanon adherents prep for Doomsday. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/increasingly-militant-parler-refugees-anxious-qanon-adherents-prep-doomsday-n1254775
  22. Trump vs. Hillary: What went viral during the 2016 US presidential election. In International conference on social informatics. Springer, 143–161.
  23. Automated hate speech detection and the problem of offensive language. In Eleventh international aaai conference on web and social media.
  24. Common sense reasoning for detection, prevention, and mitigation of cyberbullying. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 2, 3 (2012), 18.
  25. Predicting the leading political ideology of YouTube channels using acoustic, textual, and metadata information. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.08948 (2019).
  26. Hate speech detection with comment embeddings. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference on world wide web. ACM, 29–30.
  27. donk_enby. 2021. Parler Tricks. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4426283.
  28. Hate lingo: A target-based linguistic analysis of hate speech in social media. In Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
  29. Comparing the impact of social media regulations on news consumption. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems (2022).
  30. Brian Fung. 2021. Parler has now been booted by Amazon, Apple and Google — CNN business. https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/09/tech/parler-suspended-apple-app-store/index.html.
  31. A lexicon-based approach for hate speech detection. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering 10, 4 (2015), 215–230.
  32. Google Perspective API. 2020. https://www.perspectiveapi.com/.
  33. What Parler saw during the attack on the Capitol. Propublica. New York: ProPublica, Inc (2017).
  34. All You Need is” Love” Evading Hate Speech Detection. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security. 2–12.
  35. NELA-GT-2020: A large multi-labelled news dataset for the study of misinformation in news articles. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.04567 (2021).
  36. NELA-GT-2020: A Large Multi-Labelled News Dataset for The Study of Misinformation in News Articles. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2102.04567
  37. G Herbert. 2020. What is Parler?‘Free speech’social network jumps in popularity after Trump loses election.
  38. YouTube Chatter: Understanding Online Comments Discourse on Misinformative and Political YouTube Videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.00435 (2019).
  39. Auditing elon musk’s impact on hate speech and bots. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 17. 1133–1137.
  40. Kek, cucks, and god emperor trump: A measurement study of 4chan’s politically incorrect forum and its effects on the web. In Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
  41. Deplatforming did not decrease Parler users’ activity on fringe social media. PNAS nexus 2, 3 (2023), pgad035.
  42. Deceiving google’s perspective api built for detecting toxic comments. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08138 (2017).
  43. Abraham Israeli and Oren Tsur. 2022. Free speech or Free Hate Speech? Analyzing the Proliferation of Hate Speech in Parler. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH). 109–121.
  44. Online Emotions During the Storming of the US Capitol: Evidence from the Social Media Network Parler. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.04245 (2022).
  45. Online emotions during the storming of the US Capitol: evidence from the social media network Parler. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 17. 423–434.
  46. ‘Welcome to# GabFam’: Far-right virtual community on Gab. New Media & Society 25, 7 (2023), 1728–1745.
  47. Evaluating the effectiveness of deplatforming as a moderation strategy on Twitter. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1–30.
  48. The use and abuse of social media for spreading fake news. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS). IEEE, 145–148.
  49. Animesh Koratana and Kevin Hu. 2018. Toxic speech detection. URL: https://web. stanford. edu/class/archive/cs/cs224n/cs224n 1194 (2018).
  50. Nihal Kumarswamy et al. 2022. “Strict Moderation?” The Impact of Increased Moderation on Parler Content and User Behavior. Ph. D. Dissertation.
  51. Rachel Lerman. 2021. Parler’s revamped app will be allowed back on Apple’s App Store. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/04/19/parler-apple-app-store-reinstate/.
  52. Bess Levin. 2021. REPUBLICAN LAWMAKERS CLAIM JANUARY 6 RIOTERS WERE JUST FRIENDLY GUYS AND GALS TAKING A TOURIST TRIP THROUGH THE CAPITOL. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/05/capitol-attack-tourist-visit.
  53. Thomas J Main. 2018. The rise of the alt-right. Brookings Institution Press.
  54. MBFC. 2023a. The Blaze – Bias and Credibility. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-blaze/
  55. MBFC. 2023b. Rumble – Bias and Credibility. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rumble/
  56. Yashar Mehdad and Joel Tetreault. 2016. Do characters abuse more than words?. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue. 299–303.
  57. Trend Micro. 2017. Fake news and Cyber Propaganda: The use and abuse of social media. https://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/pl/security/news/cybercrime-and-digital-threats/fake-news-cyber-propaganda-the-abuse-of-social-media
  58. Social media is polarized, social media is polarized: towards a new design agenda for mitigating polarization. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 957–970.
  59. User migration in online social networks: A case study on reddit during a period of community unrest. In Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
  60. Abusive language detection in online user content. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on world wide web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 145–153.
  61. “I’m fully who I am”: Towards Centering Transgender and Non-Binary Voices to Measure Biases in Open Language Generation. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 1246–1266.
  62. ” Is it a Qoincidence?”: A First Step Towards Understanding and Characterizing the QAnon Movement on Voat. co. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.04885 (2020).
  63. Raiders of the lost kek: 3.5 years of augmented 4chan posts from the politically incorrect board. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 14. 885–894.
  64. A link-based approach to detect media bias in news websites. In Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference. 742–745.
  65. Detecting offensive language in tweets using deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.04433 (2018).
  66. Capitol (Pat) riots: A comparative study of Twitter and Parler. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.06914 (2021).
  67. Adrian Rauchfleisch and Jonas Kaiser. 2021. Deplatforming the far-right: An analysis of YouTube and BitChute. Available at SSRN (2021).
  68. Does Platform Migration Compromise Content Moderation? Evidence from r/The_Donald and r/Incels. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.10397 (2020).
  69. Caitlin M Rivers and Bryan L Lewis. 2014. Ethical research standards in a world of big data. F1000Research 3 (2014).
  70. Adi Roberston. 2021. Parler is back online after a month of downtime. https://www.theverge.com/2021/2/15/22284036/parler-social-network-relaunch-new-hosting.
  71. Richard Rogers. 2020. Deplatforming: Following extreme Internet celebrities to Telegram and alternative social media. European Journal of Communication 35, 3 (2020), 213–229.
  72. Parler and the Road to the Capitol Attack. https://www.newamerica.org/future-frontlines/reports/parler-and-the-road-to-the-capitol-attack/. (2022).
  73. Mike Rothschild. 2021. Parler wants to be the ’free speech’ alternative to Twitter. https://www.dailydot.com/debug/what-is-parler-free-speech-social-media-app/
  74. Spillover of antisocial behavior from fringe platforms: The unintended consequences of community banning. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 17. 742–753.
  75. User Engagement and the Toxicity of Tweets. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2211.03856
  76. The structure of toxic conversations on Twitter. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. 1086–1097.
  77. Cybersecurity Misinformation Detection on Social Media: Case Studies on Phishing Reports and Zoom’s Threat. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 17. 796–807.
  78. SoK: Content moderation in social media, from guidelines to enforcement, and research to practice. In 2023 IEEE 8th European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P). IEEE, 868–895.
  79. Comparing the Language of QAnon-related content on Parler, Gab, and Twitter. In 14th ACM Web Science Conference 2022. 411–421.
  80. Profanity use in online communities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1481–1490.
  81. Kate Starbird. 2017. Examining the alternative media ecosystem through the production of alternative narratives of mass shooting events on Twitter. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 11. 230–239.
  82. Predicting the topical stance and political leaning of media using tweets. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 527–537.
  83. Amaury Trujillo and Stefano Cresci. 2022. Make Reddit Great Again: Assessing Community Effects of Moderation Interventions on r/The_Donald. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.06455 (2022).
  84. Marc Tuters and Sal Hagen. 2020. (((They))) rule: Memetic antagonism and nebulous othering on 4chan. New media & society 22, 12 (2020), 2218–2237.
  85. Twitter. 2022. Twitter API. https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/twitter-api
  86. Zeerak Waseem and Dirk Hovy. 2016. Hateful symbols or hateful people? predictive features for hate speech detection on twitter. In Proceedings of the NAACL student research workshop. 88–93.
  87. Jess Weatherbed. 2023. Parler goes offline after being sold to a new owner. https://www.theverge.com/2023/4/14/23683207/parler-shutting-down-relaunch-aquisition-announcement-conservative-social-media.
  88. Challenges in detoxifying language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.07445 (2021).
  89. Political Bias and Factualness in News Sharing across more than 100,000 Online Communities. ICWSM (2021).
  90. What is gab: A bastion of free speech or an alt-right echo chamber. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018. 1007–1014.
  91. Measuring and Characterizing Hate Speech on News Websites. In 12TH ACM WEB SCIENCE CONFERENCE. ACM.
  92. Conversational flow in Oxford-style debates. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.03114 (2016).
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Nihal Kumarswamy (3 papers)
  2. Mohit Singhal (7 papers)
  3. Shirin Nilizadeh (32 papers)
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com