Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Quantum Computing and Visualization: A Disruptive Technological Change Ahead (2310.04937v2)

Published 7 Oct 2023 in quant-ph and cs.ET

Abstract: The focus of this Visualization Viewpoints article is to provide some background on Quantum Computing (QC), to explore ideas related to how visualization helps in understanding QC, and examine how QC might be useful for visualization with the growth and maturation of both technologies in the future. In a quickly evolving technology landscape, QC is emerging as a promising pathway to overcome the growth limits in classical computing. In some cases, QC platforms offer the potential to vastly outperform the familiar classical computer by solving problems more quickly or that may be intractable on any known classical platform. As further performance gains for classical computing platforms are limited by diminishing Moore's Law scaling, QC platforms might be viewed as a potential successor to the current field of exascale-class platforms. While present-day QC hardware platforms are still limited in scale, the field of quantum computing is robust and rapidly advancing in terms of hardware capabilities, software environments for developing quantum algorithms, and educational programs for training the next generation of scientists and engineers. After a brief introduction to QC concepts, the focus of this article is to explore the interplay between the fields of visualization and QC. First, visualization has played a role in QC by providing the means to show representations of the quantum state of single-qubits in superposition states and multiple-qubits in entangled states. Second, there are a number of ways in which the field of visual data exploration and analysis may potentially benefit from this disruptive new technology though there are challenges going forward.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. X. Lu and H. Lin, “A framework for quantum ray tracing,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.15451
  2. B. H. McCormick, T. A. DeFanti, and M. D. Brown, “Visualization in Scientific Computing,” Computer Graphics, vol. 21, no. 6, Nov. 1987, ACM SIGGRAPH: New York.
  3. J. Kempe, “Quantum random walks: An introductory overview,” Contemporary Physics, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 307–327, 2003. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/00107151031000110776
  4. I. Corporation, “IBM Quantum,” online at https://quantum-computing.ibm.com/, last accessed Aug. 2023.
  5. J. Preskill, “Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond,” Quantum, vol. 2, p. 79, Aug. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79
  6. IBM, “IBM Quantum Composer User Guide,” online at https://quantum-computing.ibm.com/composer/docs/iqx/, last accessed June 2023.
  7. F. Bloch, “Nuclear induction,” Phys. Rev., vol. 70, pp. 460–474, Oct 1946. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.70.460
  8. A. Glassner, “Quantum computing, part 1,” IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., vol. 21, no. 4, p. 84–92, jul 2001. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/38.953464
  9. M. O. Lanzagorta, R. B. Gomez, and J. K. Uhlmann, “Quantum rendering,” in Quantum Information and Computation, E. Donkor, A. R. Pirich, and H. E. Brandt, Eds., vol. 5105, International Society for Optics and Photonics.   SPIE, 2003, pp. 128 – 136. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.486410
  10. L. P. Santos, T. Bashford-Rogers, J. Barbosa, and P. Navrátil, “Towards quantum ray tracing,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.12797
  11. S. Caraiman and V. I. Manta, “New applications of quantum algorithms to computer graphics: The quantum random sample consensus algorithm,” in Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Computing Frontiers, ser. CF ’09.   New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2009, p. 81–88. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/1531743.1531757
  12. E. R. Johnston, “Quantum supersampling,” in ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 Talks, ser. SIGGRAPH ’16.   New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2897839.2927422
  13. M. G. Amankwah, D. Camps, E. W. Bethel, R. Van Beeumen, and T. Perciano, “Quantum pixel representations and compression for N𝑁Nitalic_N-dimensional images,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 7712, May 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11024-y
  14. Qiskit contributors, “IBM Quantum Learning,” 2023, online at https://qiskit.org/learn, last accessed Aug. 2023.
  15. C. Albornoz and et al., “Xanadu Quantum Cookbook,” 2023, online at https://codebook.xanadu.ai/, last accessed Sep. 2023.
  16. G. Q. Team, “Cirq: An open source framework for programming quantum computers,” 2023, online at https://quantumai.google/cirq, last accessed Aug. 2023.
  17. Qiskit contributors, “Qiskit Tutorials: An Open-source Framework for Quantum Computing,” 2023, online at https://qiskit.org/documentation/tutorials.html, last accessed Aug. 2023.
  18. Microsoft, “Quickstart: Submit a circuit with Cirq to Azure Quantum,” 2023, online at https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/quantum/quickstart-microsoft-cirq.
  19. Amazon, “ Amazon Braket,” 2023, online at https://aws.amazon.com/braket/, last accessed Aug. 2023.
  20. T. Tilma and E. Sudarshan, “Generalized euler angle parameterization for u (n) with applications to su (n) coset volume measures,” Journal of Geometry and Physics, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 263–283, 2004.
  21. Qiskit contributors, “Qiskit: An open-source framework for quantum computing,” 2023, online at https://qiskit.org/ and doi:10.5281/zenodo.2573505, last accessed Sep. 2023.
Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.