A Dataset of Anatomical Environments for Medical Robots: Modeling Respiratory Deformation (2310.04289v1)
Abstract: Anatomical models of a medical robot's environment can significantly help guide design and development of a new robotic system. These models can be used for benchmarking motion planning algorithms, evaluating controllers, optimizing mechanical design choices, simulating procedures, and even as resources for data generation. Currently, the time-consuming task of generating these environments is repeatedly performed by individual research groups and rarely shared broadly. This not only leads to redundant efforts, but also makes it challenging to compare systems and algorithms accurately. In this work, we present a collection of clinically-relevant anatomical environments for medical robots operating in the lungs. Since anatomical deformation is a fundamental challenge for medical robots operating in the lungs, we describe a way to model respiratory deformation in these environments using patient-derived data. We share the environments and deformation data publicly by adding them to the Medical Robotics Anatomical Dataset (Med-RAD), our public dataset of anatomical environments for medical robots.
- P. E. Dupont, et al., “A decade retrospective of medical robotics research from 2010 to 2020,” Science Robotics, vol. 6, no. 60, 2021.
- A. Attanasio, et al., “Autonomy in surgical robotics,” Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, vol. 4, pp. 651–679, 2021.
- J. Troccaz, et al., “Frontiers of medical robotics: from concept to systems to clinical translation,” Annual review of biomedical engineering, vol. 21, pp. 193–218, 2019.
- I. Fried, et al., “A clinical dataset for the evaluation of motion planners in medical applications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.10834, 2022.
- R. L. Siegel, et al., “Cancer statistics, 2023,” CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 17–48, 2023.
- A. C. Chen, et al., “Robotic bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions: a multicenter pilot and feasibility study (BENEFIT),” Chest, vol. 159, no. 2, pp. 845–852, 2021.
- L. Yarmus, et al., “A prospective randomized comparative study of three guided bronchoscopic approaches for investigating pulmonary nodules: the PRECISION-1 study,” Chest, vol. 157, no. 3, pp. 694–701, 2020.
- M. J. Diddams and H. J. Lee, “Robotic bronchoscopy: Review of three systems,” Life, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 354, 2023.
- G. Pittiglio, et al., “Personalized magnetic tentacles for targeted photothermal cancer therapy in peripheral lungs,” Communications Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 50, 2023.
- A. Kuntz, et al., “Autonomous medical needle steering in vivo,” Science Robotics, vol. 8, no. 82, p. eadf7614, 2023.
- B. S. Furukawa, et al., “Comparing pulmonary nodule location during electromagnetic bronchoscopy with predicted location on the basis of two virtual airway maps at different phases of respiration,” Chest, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 181–186, Jan. 2018.
- A. Chen, et al., “The effect of respiratory motion on pulmonary nodule location during electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy,” Chest, vol. 147, no. 5, pp. 1275–1281, May 2015.
- R. Kikinis, et al., “3D Slicer: a platform for subject-specific image analysis, visualization, and clinical support,” Intraoperative imaging and image-guided therapy, pp. 277–289, 2014.
- P. Lo, et al., “Extraction of airways from ct (EXACT’09),” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 2093–2107, Nov. 2012.
- E. M. Eslick, et al., “CT ventilation imaging derived from breath hold CT exhibits good regional accuracy with Galligas PET,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 267–273, 2018.
- ——, “Ct ventilation as a functional imaging modality for lung cancer radiotherapy (ct-vs-pet-ventilation-imaging),” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://wiki.cancerimagingarchive.net/x/YIF8Bw
- K. Clark, et al., “The cancer imaging archive (tcia): maintaining and operating a public information repository,” Journal of digital imaging, vol. 26, pp. 1045–1057, 2013.
- S. Klein, et al., “Elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 196–205, 2009.
- R. Castillo, et al., “A reference dataset for deformable image registration spatial accuracy evaluation using the COPDgene study archive,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 2861–2877, May 2013.
- E. F. Hofstad, et al., “Intraoperative localized constrained registration in navigated bronchoscopy,” Medical Physics, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 4204–4212, Aug. 2017.
- I. Fried, et al., “Landmark based bronchoscope localization for needle insertion under respiratory deformation,” To appear at IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2023.
- T. Jianu, et al., “CathSim: An open-source simulator for autonomous cannulation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01455, 2022.
- N. Chentanez, et al., “Interactive simulation of surgical needle insertion and steering,” in ACM SIGGRAPH, 2009, pp. 1–10.
- R. Dreyfus, et al., “A simulation framework for magnetic continuum robots,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 8370–8376, 2022.
- M. Mittal, et al., “ORBIT: A unified simulation framework for interactive robot learning environments,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2023.
- E. Rohmer, et al., “CoppeliaSim (formerly V-REP): a Versatile and Scalable Robot Simulation Framework,” in Proc. of The International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2013.
- X. Liang, et al., “ORRN: An ODE-based recursive registration network for deformable respiratory motion estimation with lung 4DCT images,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2023.
- Z. Shen, et al., “Accurate point cloud registration with robust optimal transport,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, pp. 5373–5389, 2021.
- A. Duetschler, et al., “Synthetic 4DCT (MRI) lung phantom generation for 4D radiotherapy and image guidance investigations,” Medical physics, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 2890–2903, 2022.