Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

High-Degrees-of-Freedom Dynamic Neural Fields for Robot Self-Modeling and Motion Planning (2310.03624v2)

Published 5 Oct 2023 in cs.CV, cs.LG, and cs.RO

Abstract: A robot self-model is a task-agnostic representation of the robot's physical morphology that can be used for motion planning tasks in the absence of a classical geometric kinematic model. In particular, when the latter is hard to engineer or the robot's kinematics change unexpectedly, human-free self-modeling is a necessary feature of truly autonomous agents. In this work, we leverage neural fields to allow a robot to self-model its kinematics as a neural-implicit query model learned only from 2D images annotated with camera poses and configurations. This enables significantly greater applicability than existing approaches which have been dependent on depth images or geometry knowledge. To this end, alongside a curricular data sampling strategy, we propose a new encoder-based neural density field architecture for dynamic object-centric scenes conditioned on high numbers of degrees of freedom (DOFs). In a 7-DOF robot test setup, the learned self-model achieves a Chamfer-L2 distance of 2% of the robot's workspace dimension. We demonstrate the capabilities of this model on motion planning tasks as an exemplary downstream application.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (41)
  1. “NeRF: Representing Scenes as Neural Radiance Fields for View Synthesis” In European Conference on Computer Vision, 2020, pp. 405–421 Springer
  2. “Uncertainty Guided Policy for Active Robotic 3D Reconstruction Using Neural Radiance Fields” In IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7.4, 2022, pp. 12070–12077 DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2022.3212668
  3. “Vision-only robot navigation in a neural radiance world” In IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7.2 IEEE, 2022, pp. 4606–4613
  4. “LENS: Localization enhanced by NeRF synthesis” In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Robot Learning 164, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research PMLR, 2022, pp. 1347–1356
  5. “Loc-nerf: Monte carlo localization using neural radiance fields” In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2023, pp. 4018–4025 IEEE
  6. Henry W Stone “Kinematic modeling, identification, and control of robotic manipulators” Springer Science & Business Media, 1987
  7. “Fully body visual self-modeling of robot morphologies” In Science Robotics 7.68 American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2022, pp. eabn1944
  8. “D-nerf: Neural radiance fields for dynamic scenes” In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021, pp. 10318–10327
  9. “Nerfies: Deformable neural radiance fields” In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021, pp. 5865–5874
  10. “Non-rigid neural radiance fields: Reconstruction and novel view synthesis of a dynamic scene from monocular video” In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021, pp. 12959–12970
  11. “Animatable neural radiance fields for modeling dynamic human bodies” In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021, pp. 14314–14323
  12. Robert Kwiatkowski “Deep Self-Modeling for Robotic Systems” Columbia University, 2022
  13. Anthony Dearden “Developmental learning of internal models for robotics”, 2008
  14. Philippe Rochat “Five levels of self-awareness as they unfold early in life” In Consciousness and cognition 12.4 Elsevier, 2003, pp. 717–731
  15. Josh Bongard, Victor Zykov and Hod Lipson “Resilient machines through continuous self-modeling” In Science 314.5802 American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2006, pp. 1118–1121
  16. Josh C Bongard and Hod Lipson “Automated damage diagnosis and recovery for remote robotics” In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA’04. 2004 4, 2004, pp. 3545–3550 IEEE
  17. “Using probabilistic reasoning over time to self-recognize” In Robotics and Autonomous Systems 57.4, 2009, pp. 384–392 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2008.07.006
  18. “Task-agnostic self-modeling machines” In Science Robotics 4.26 American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2019, pp. eaau9354
  19. “Manipulation for self-identification, and self-identification for better manipulation” In Science Robotics 6.54 American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2021, pp. eabe1321
  20. “A new kind of accurate calibration method for robotic kinematic parameters based on the extended Kalman and particle filter algorithm” In IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 65.4 IEEE, 2017, pp. 3337–3345
  21. “Interactive perception: Leveraging action in perception and perception in action” In IEEE Transactions on Robotics 33.6 IEEE, 2017, pp. 1273–1291
  22. “Learning Awareness Models” In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018
  23. James T Kajiya and Brian P Von Herzen “Ray tracing volume densities” In ACM SIGGRAPH computer graphics 18.3 ACM New York, NY, USA, 1984, pp. 165–174
  24. Nelson Max “Optical models for direct volume rendering” In IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 1.2 IEEE, 1995, pp. 99–108
  25. “Neural scene flow fields for space-time view synthesis of dynamic scenes” In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021, pp. 6498–6508
  26. “Space-time neural irradiance fields for free-viewpoint video” In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021, pp. 9421–9431
  27. “Dynamic view synthesis from dynamic monocular video” In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021, pp. 5712–5721
  28. “Neural articulated radiance field” In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021, pp. 5762–5772
  29. “Neural 3d video synthesis from multi-view video” In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 5521–5531
  30. Helena A Correia and José Henrique Brito “3D reconstruction of human bodies from single-view and multi-view images: A systematic review” In Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Elsevier, 2023, pp. 107620
  31. “Human 3D Avatar Modeling with Implicit Neural Representation: A Brief Survey” In 2022 14th International Conference on Signal Processing Systems (ICSPS), 2022, pp. 818–827 IEEE
  32. “Neural actor: Neural free-view synthesis of human actors with pose control” In ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) 40.6 ACM New York, NY, USA, 2021, pp. 1–16
  33. “Humannerf: Free-viewpoint rendering of moving people from monocular video” In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 16210–16220
  34. “Tava: Template-free animatable volumetric actors” In European Conference on Computer Vision, 2022, pp. 419–436 Springer
  35. , https://youtu.be/c1G0zFrM_sQ
  36. “Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces” In IEEE transactions on Robotics and Automation 12.4 IEEE, 1996, pp. 566–580
  37. Steven LaValle “Rapidly-exploring random trees: A new tool for path planning” In Research Report 9811 Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University, 1998
  38. Erwin Coumans “Pybullet Robots”, 2020 URL: https://github.com/erwincoumans/pybullet_robots
  39. “Pybullet, a python module for physics simulation for games, robotics and machine learning”, 2016
  40. “Efficient implementation of marching cubes’ cases with topological guarantees” In Journal of graphics tools 8.2 Taylor & Francis, 2003, pp. 1–15
  41. Gabriel Taubin “Curve and surface smoothing without shrinkage” In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on computer vision, 1995, pp. 852–857 IEEE
Citations (2)

Summary

  • The paper introduces an encoder-based neural density field architecture that models robot kinematics using 2D images with annotated camera poses.
  • It employs differentiable rendering and separate encoders for spatial and DOF configurations to reconstruct accurate 3D representations of robot morphology.
  • The approach achieves a 2% Chamfer-L2 distance on a 7-DOF robot testbed, demonstrating effective self-modeling for practical motion planning tasks.

High-Degrees-of-Freedom Dynamic Neural Fields for Robot Self-Modeling and Motion Planning

This paper, authored by Lennart Schulze and Hod Lipson, presents a novel approach to robot self-modeling using high-degrees-of-freedom dynamic neural fields. The authors propose an encoder-based neural density field architecture capable of representing object-centric scenes with numerous degrees of freedom (DOFs), driven solely by 2D images annotated with camera poses and configurations. The methodology allows for the reconstruction of a robot's physical morphology in scenarios where classical geometric kinematic models may be infeasible.

The presented work builds upon neural fields combined with differentiable rendering, enabling the learning of 3D scene representations from multiple camera views. By eschewing the traditional reliance on depth images or explicit geometry information, the authors introduce a neural-implicit query model capable of self-modeling robot kinematics in a substantially more versatile manner than existing approaches. The design incorporates curricular data sampling and a specialized MLP architecture that leverages separate encoders for spatial coordinates and DOF configurations to create a continuous map, yielding a comprehensive kinematic representation.

The authors validate their approach on a 7-DOF robot testbed, achieving an average Chamfer-L2 distance of 2% relative to the robot's workspace dimension, a promising result indicating close spatial proximity between predicted and ground-truth models. Furthermore, practical application is demonstrated through motion planning tasks, utilizing the learned model's forward and inverse kinematics for trajectory generation.

Schulze and Lipson's work draws significant implications for future developments in AI, particularly in robotics where self-modeling is crucial for autonomous agents. By circumventing depth and geometric model requirements, this work potentially paves the way for rapid adoption in dynamic environments, enhancing resilience in robots subjected to unforeseen morphological changes. The introduction of high-DOFs neural fields also promises advancements in related fields, such as automotive or aeronautics, where complex dynamic modeling is required.

From a theoretical perspective, the flexibility of dynamic neural fields in representing both spatial and parametric changes suggests broader applications beyond robotics. Future developments might explore the integration with environment modeling, handling multi-agent systems, and applications in dynamically controlled environments across various domains. The potential to extend this approach by integrating it with existing neural field methodologies representing environmental features could generate richer, joint models, enhancing decision-making processes and task execution in robotics and other fields requiring nuanced representation of intricate systems.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com