Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
158 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Accelerating Power System State Estimation (2310.03088v1)

Published 4 Oct 2023 in cs.LG, cs.SY, and eess.SY

Abstract: State estimation is the cornerstone of the power system control center since it provides the operating condition of the system in consecutive time intervals. This work investigates the application of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for accelerating power systems state estimation in monitoring the operation of power systems. Traditional state estimation techniques often rely on iterative algorithms that can be computationally intensive, particularly for large-scale power systems. In this paper, a novel approach that leverages the inherent physical knowledge of power systems through the integration of PINNs is proposed. By incorporating physical laws as prior knowledge, the proposed method significantly reduces the computational complexity associated with state estimation while maintaining high accuracy. The proposed method achieves up to 11% increase in accuracy, 75% reduction in standard deviation of results, and 30% faster convergence, as demonstrated by comprehensive experiments on the IEEE 14-bus system.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (10)
  1. D. Mukherjee, S. Chakraborty, and S. Ghosh, “Power system state forecasting using machine learning techniques,” Electrical Engineering, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 283–305, 2022.
  2. S. Falas, C. Konstantinou, and M. K. Michael, “Special session: Physics- informed neural networks for securing water distribution systems,” in 2020 IEEE 38th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD), 2020, pp. 37–40.
  3. M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations,” Journal of Computational physics, vol. 378, pp. 686–707, 2019.
  4. B. Huang and J. Wang, “Applications of physics-informed neural networks in power systems-a review,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2022.
  5. K. R. Mestav, J. Luengo-Rozas, and L. Tong, “Bayesian state estimation for unobservable distribution systems via deep learning,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 4910–4920, 2019.
  6. L. Zhang, G. Wang, and G. B. Giannakis, “Real-time power system state estimation and forecasting via deep unrolled neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 67, no. 15, pp. 4069–4077, 2019.
  7. A. S. Zamzam and N. D. Sidiropoulos, “Physics-aware neural networks for distribution system state estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 4347–4356, 2020.
  8. L. Pagnier and M. Chertkov, “Physics-informed graphical neural network for parameter & state estimations in power systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.06349, 2021.
  9. P. Demetriou, M. Asprou, J. Quiros-Tortos, and E. Kyriakides, “Dynamic ieee test systems for transient analysis,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 2108–2117, 2017.
  10. M. Asprou, E. Kyriakides, and M. Albu, “The effect of variable weights in a wls state estimator considering instrument transformer uncertainties,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 1484–1495, 2013.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.