Impact of geography on the importance of parameters in infectious disease models (2310.02449v2)
Abstract: Agent-based models are widely used to predict infectious disease spread. For these predictions, one needs to understand how each input parameter affects the result. Here, some parameters may affect the sensitivities of others, requiring the analysis of higher order coefficients through e.g. Sobol sensitivity analysis. The geographical structures of real-world regions are distinct in that they are difficult to reduce to single parameter values, making a unified sensitivity analysis intractable. Yet analyzing the importance of geographical structure on the sensitivity of other input parameters is important because a strong effect would justify the use of models with real-world geographical representations, as opposed to stylized ones. Here we perform a grouped Sobol's sensitivity analysis on COVID-19 spread simulations across a set of three diverse real-world geographical representations. We study the differences in both results and the sensitivity of non-geographical parameters across these geographies. By comparing Sobol indices of parameters across geographies, we find evidence that infection rate could have more sensitivity in regions where the population is segregated, while parameters like recovery period of mild cases are more sensitive in regions with mixed populations. We also show how geographical structure affects parameter sensitivity changes over time.
- Mathematical modeling of the west africa ebola epidemic. \JournalTitleeLife 4, e09186, DOI: 10.7554/eLife.09186 (2015).
- Modeling the impact of interventions on an epidemic of ebola in sierra leone and liberia. \JournalTitlePLoS currents 6 (2014).
- Pros and cons of estimating the reproduction number from early epidemic growth rate of influenza a (h1n1) 2009. \JournalTitleTheoretical Biology and Medical Modelling 7, 1, DOI: 10.1186/1742-4682-7-1 (2010).
- Chowell, G. et al. The influence of climatic conditions on the transmission dynamics of the 2009 a/h1n1 influenza pandemic in chile. \JournalTitleBMC Infectious Diseases 12, 298, DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-298 (2012).
- O’Reilly, K. M. et al. Projecting the end of the zika virus epidemic in latin america: a modelling analysis. \JournalTitleBMC Medicine 16, 180, DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1158-8 (2018).
- A review on covid-19 forecasting models. \JournalTitleNeural Computing and Applications DOI: 10.1007/s00521-020-05626-8 (2021).
- Wynants, L. et al. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal. \JournalTitleBMJ 369, DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m1328 (2020). https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1328.full.pdf.
- Adiga, A. et al. Mathematical models for covid-19 pandemic: A comparative analysis. \JournalTitleJournal of the Indian Institute of Science 100, 793–807, DOI: 10.1007/s41745-020-00200-6 (2020).
- Agent-based modeling vs. equation-based modeling: A case study and users’ guide. In Sichman, J. S., Conte, R. & Gilbert, N. (eds.) Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation, 10–25 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1998).
- Brauer, F. Compartmental Models in Epidemiology, 19–79 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008).
- Leontitsis, A. et al. Seahir: A specialized compartmental model for covid-19. \JournalTitleInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052667 (2021).
- Abou-Ismail, A. Compartmental models of the covid-19 pandemic for physicians and physician-scientists. \JournalTitleSN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine 2, 852–858, DOI: 10.1007/s42399-020-00330-z (2020).
- Kong, L. et al. Compartmental structures used in modeling covid-19: a scoping review. \JournalTitleInfectious Diseases of Poverty 11, 72, DOI: 10.1186/s40249-022-01001-y (2022).
- An agent-based modeling of covid-19: Validation, analysis, and recommendations. \JournalTitleCognitive Computation DOI: 10.1007/s12559-020-09801-w (2021).
- Cuevas, E. An agent-based model to evaluate the covid-19 transmission risks in facilities. \JournalTitleComputers in Biology and Medicine 121, 103827, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103827 (2020).
- Kerr, C. C. et al. Covasim: An agent-based model of covid-19 dynamics and interventions. \JournalTitlePLOS Computational Biology 17, 1–32, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009149 (2021).
- Aylett-Bullock, J. et al. J<span class="smallcaps smallercapital">une</span>: open-source individual-based epidemiology simulation. \JournalTitleRoyal Society Open Science 8, 210506, DOI: 10.1098/rsos.210506 (2021). https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.210506.
- Identification and review of sensitivity analysis methods. \JournalTitleRisk Analysis 22, 553–578, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00039 (2002). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/0272-4332.00039.
- A Review on Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods, 101–122 (Springer US, Boston, MA, 2015).
- Hamby, D. M. A comparison of sensitivity analysis techniques. \JournalTitleHealth Physics 68 (1995).
- Sobol, I. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their monte carlo estimates. \JournalTitleMathematics and Computers in Simulation 55, 271–280, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6 (2001). The Second IMACS Seminar on Monte Carlo Methods.
- Mahmood, I. et al. Facs: a geospatial agent-based simulator for analysing covid-19 spread and public health measures on local regions. \JournalTitleJournal of Simulation 16, 355–373 (2022).
- Arindam Saha (15 papers)
- Maziar Ghorbani (1 paper)
- Diana Suleimenova (2 papers)
- Anastasia Anagnostou (1 paper)
- Derek Groen (25 papers)