Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

One Clean Qubit Suffices for Quantum Communication Advantage (2310.02406v1)

Published 3 Oct 2023 in quant-ph and cs.CC

Abstract: We study the one-clean-qubit model of quantum communication where one qubit is in a pure state and all other qubits are maximally mixed. We demonstrate a partial function that has a quantum protocol of cost $O(\log N)$ in this model, however, every interactive randomized protocol has cost $\Omega(\sqrt{N})$, settling a conjecture of Klauck and Lim. In contrast, all prior quantum versus classical communication separations required at least $\Omega(\log N)$ clean qubits. The function demonstrating our separation also has an efficient protocol in the quantum-simultaneous-with-entanglement model of cost $O(\log N )$. We thus recover the state-of-the-art separations between quantum and classical communication complexity. Our proof is based on a recent hypercontractivity inequality introduced by Ellis, Kindler, Lifshitz, and Minzer, in conjunction with tools from the representation theory of compact Lie groups.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (38)
  1. A qubit, a coin, and an advice string walk into a relational problem. Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex., TR23, 2023.
  2. Property testing lower bounds via communication complexity. computational complexity, 21(2):311–358, 2012.
  3. Quantum vs. classical communication and computation. In Proceedings of the thirtieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 63–68, 1998.
  4. Quantum fingerprinting. Physical Review Letters, 87(16):167902, 2001.
  5. Uniform expansion bounds for cayley graphs of. Annals of Mathematics, pages 625–642, 2008.
  6. Exponential separation of quantum and classical one-way communication complexity. SIAM Journal on Computing, 38(1):366–384, 2008.
  7. A hypercontractive inequality for matrix-valued functions with applications to quantum computing and ldcs. In 2008 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 477–486. IEEE, 2008.
  8. The quantum complexity of computing schatten p-norms. In 13th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography, TQC 2018, July 16-18, 2018, Sydney, Australia, volume 111 of LIPIcs, pages 4:1–4:20. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2018.
  9. Exponential quantum communication reductions from generalizations of the boolean hidden matching problem. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.05553, 2020.
  10. Product mixing in compact Lie groups, 2023. Preprint on electronic colloquium on computational complexity: TR23-133.
  11. Exponential lower bounds for polytopes in combinatorial optimization. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 62(2):1–23, 2015.
  12. Dmitry Gavinsky. Entangled simultaneity versus classical interactivity in communication complexity. In Daniel Wichs and Yishay Mansour, editors, Proceedings of the 48th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2016, Cambridge, MA, USA, June 18-21, 2016, pages 877–884. ACM, 2016.
  13. Dmitry Gavinsky. Quantum versus classical simultaneity in communication complexity. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 65(10):6466–6483, 2019.
  14. Dmitry Gavinsky. Bare quantum simultaneity versus classical interactivity in communication complexity. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 401–411, 2020.
  15. Strengths and weaknesses of quantum fingerprinting. 2006.
  16. Exponential separations for one-way quantum communication complexity, with applications to cryptography. In Proceedings of the thirty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 516–525, 2007.
  17. Bounded-error quantum state identification and exponential separations in communication complexity. In Proceedings of the thirty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 594–603, 2006.
  18. W. T. Gowers. Quasirandom Groups. Combin. Probab. Comput., 17:363–387, 2008.
  19. Quantum versus randomized communication complexity, with efficient players. Comput. Complex., 31(2):17, 2022.
  20. The communication complexity of interleaved group products. In Proceedings of the forty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 351–360, 2015.
  21. On the virtue of succinct proofs: Amplifying communication complexity hardness to time-space trade-offs in proof complexity. In Proceedings of the forty-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 233–248, 2012.
  22. Experimental demonstration of quantum advantage for one-way communication complexity surpassing best-known classical protocol. Nature communications, 10(1):4152, 2019.
  23. Streaming lower bounds for approximating max-cut. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 1263–1282. SIAM, 2014.
  24. E. Knill and R. Laflamme. Power of one bit of quantum information. Phys. Rev. Lett., 81:5672–5675, Dec 1998.
  25. The power of one clean qubit in communication complexity. 2019.
  26. On the largest product-free subsets of the alternating groups. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.15191, 2022.
  27. Super-logarithmic depth lower bounds via the direct sum in communication complexity. Computational Complexity, 5(3):191–204, 1995.
  28. Monotone circuits for connectivity require super-logarithmic depth. SIAM J. Discret. Math., 3(2):255–265, 1990.
  29. Hardness of classically simulating the one-clean-qubit model. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112:130502, Apr 2014.
  30. On data structures and asymmetric communication complexity. In Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 103–111, 1995.
  31. Ashley Montanaro. A new exponential separation between quantum and classical one-way communication complexity. arXiv preprint arXiv:1007.3587, 2010.
  32. Ran Raz. Exponential separation of quantum and classical communication complexity. In Proceedings of the thirty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 358–367, 1999.
  33. Quantum one-way communication can be exponentially stronger than classical communication. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, San Jose, CA, USA, 6-8 June 2011, pages 31–40. ACM, 2011.
  34. Aaronson Scott. Talk: Verifiable quantum supremacy: What i hope will be done, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6YPAQlGejo&ab_channel=SimonsInstitute.
  35. Estimating jones polynomials is a complete problem for one clean qubit. Quantum Info. Comput., 8(8):681–714, sep 2008.
  36. Limits of quantum one-way communication by matrix hypercontractive inequality. 2012.
  37. P. Sarnak and X. Xue. Bounds for multiplicities of automorphic representations. Duke Math. J., 64(1):207–227, 1991.
  38. Andrew Chi-Chih Yao. Some complexity questions related to distributive computing (preliminary report). In Proceedings of the eleventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 209–213, 1979.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Srinivasan Arunachalam (42 papers)
  2. Uma Girish (14 papers)
  3. Noam Lifshitz (43 papers)
Citations (5)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.