On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on their own Data (2310.00429v5)

Abstract: Deep generative models have made tremendous progress in modeling complex data, often exhibiting generation quality that surpasses a typical human's ability to discern the authenticity of samples. Undeniably, a key driver of this success is enabled by the massive amounts of web-scale data consumed by these models. Due to these models' striking performance and ease of availability, the web will inevitably be increasingly populated with synthetic content. Such a fact directly implies that future iterations of generative models will be trained on both clean and artificially generated data from past models. In this paper, we develop a framework to rigorously study the impact of training generative models on mixed datasets -- from classical training on real data to self-consuming generative models trained on purely synthetic data. We first prove the stability of iterative training under the condition that the initial generative models approximate the data distribution well enough and the proportion of clean training data (w.r.t. synthetic data) is large enough. We empirically validate our theory on both synthetic and natural images by iteratively training normalizing flows and state-of-the-art diffusion models on CIFAR10 and FFHQ.

Essay: On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on Their Own Data

The paper "On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on their Own Data" explores a critical issue that arises with the escalating proliferation of synthetic data generated by sophisticated deep generative models. As these models continue to fill the web with synthetic content, they inevitably face training datasets that contain both real and synthetic data. This paper constructs a theoretical and empirical framework to examine the implications of such mixed datasets on the performance and stability of generative models.

Overview

The paper begins by noting the substantial progress achieved by deep generative models in producing high-quality data that convincingly simulates real data distributions. Crucial to these advancements are the massive datasets sourced from the internet, which will increasingly include data generated by previous iterations of such models. This feedback loop raises the question: how does the retraining of generative models on datasets augmented with synthetic data affect model performance?

To address this question, the authors propose a structured approach examining the iterative retraining process. They analyze the characteristics of generative models retrained in various conditions—ranging from datasets composed solely of real data to those with purely synthetic data—and develop a theoretical framework to demonstrate model stability in such contexts.

Theoretical Contributions

Central to the paper's contributions is the development of a model stability theorem. The paper proves that iterative retraining is stable if two conditions are met: the initial model must closely approximate the real data distribution, and the proportion of real data in subsequent training datasets must be sufficiently high. This theoretical finding is supported by constructing a stability framework based on maximum likelihood estimation objectives.

The researchers leverage mathematical techniques to delve into the behavior of these models under iterative retraining. Additionally, they prove the existence of fixed points that prevent the models from diverging or collapsing into suboptimal parameter configurations. The analysis accommodates various model architectures like VAEs, normalizing flows, and diffusion models, ensuring a comprehensive examination across different generative paradigms.

Empirical Validation

The paper extends its theoretical insights by empirically validating them using experiments with synthetic and natural image datasets, including CIFAR10 and FFHQ. The experiments reveal the nuances of retraining models using diffusing processes and normalizing flows when exposed to a blend of real and synthetic data.

These experiments substantiate the theoretical predictions, demonstrating that iterative retraining stabilizes when phrases of real data usage surpass certain thresholds. This balance ensures that models do not collapse under self-referential training, supporting the practical application of these findings in large-scale models prone to data contamination on the internet.

Implications and Future Directions

From a practical standpoint, the results suggest strategies for practitioners dealing with datasets that include synthetic elements. Importantly, the requirement to maintain a robust proportion of real data components becomes clear. The paper implies that the generative model community must be cautious about potential quality degradation due to synthetic data iterations.

Theoretically, the work lays the groundwork for further exploration of training dynamics in generative models. Future research could extend to exploring the boundedness conditions more deeply and addressing the complexities associated with real-world datasets that naturally blend diverse data types. Understanding the ethical and quality implications of synthetic data in AI systems remains an important consideration.

In conclusion, this paper provides a rigorous examination of a fundamental issue for deep generative models, setting a key direction for future explorations in iterative model refinement within mixed data contexts. The blend of theoretical guarantees and empirical insights offers a robust framework for ensuring the sustained efficacy of generative models in increasingly synthetic data-rich environments.