Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
166 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Single Image Test-Time Adaptation for Segmentation (2309.14052v2)

Published 25 Sep 2023 in cs.CV

Abstract: Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) methods improve the robustness of deep neural networks to domain shift on a variety of tasks such as image classification or segmentation. This work explores adapting segmentation models to a single unlabelled image with no other data available at test-time. In particular, this work focuses on adaptation by optimizing self-supervised losses at test-time. Multiple baselines based on different principles are evaluated under diverse conditions and a novel adversarial training is introduced for adaptation with mask refinement. Our additions to the baselines result in a 3.51 and 3.28 % increase over non-adapted baselines, without these improvements, the increase would be 1.7 and 2.16 % only.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (44)
  1. The effect of data augmentation on the performance of convolutional neural networks. Braz. Soc. Comput. Intell, 2017.
  2. Layer normalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.06450, 2016.
  3. Mt3: Meta test-time training for self-supervised test-time adaption. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 3080–3090. PMLR, 2022.
  4. Contrastive test-time adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 295–305, 2022.
  5. The cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3213–3223, 2016.
  6. The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge. International journal of computer vision, 88:303–338, 2010.
  7. Computer rendering of stochastic models. Communications of the ACM, 25(6):371–384, 1982.
  8. Test-time training with masked autoencoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.07522, 2022.
  9. Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6572, 2014.
  10. Semi-supervised learning by entropy minimization. Advances in neural information processing systems, 17, 2004.
  11. Benchmarking neural network robustness to common corruptions and perturbations. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019.
  12. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In International conference on machine learning, pages 448–456, 2015.
  13. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In International conference on machine learning, pages 448–456. pmlr, 2015.
  14. Test-time adaptable neural networks for robust medical image segmentation. Medical Image Analysis, 68:101907, 2021.
  15. SITA: Single Image Test-time Adaptation.
  16. Adversarial examples in the physical world. In Artificial intelligence safety and security, pages 99–112. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2018.
  17. Dong-Hyun Lee et al. Pseudo-label: The simple and efficient semi-supervised learning method for deep neural networks. In Workshop on challenges in representation learning, ICML, volume 3, page 896, 2013.
  18. Rethinking distributional matching based domain adaptation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.13352, 2020.
  19. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part V 13, pages 740–755. Springer, 2014.
  20. Ttt++: When does self-supervised test-time training fail or thrive? Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:21808–21820, 2021.
  21. Source-free domain adaptation for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1215–1224, 2021.
  22. Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017.
  23. Towards deep learning models resistant to adversarial attacks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.06083, 2017.
  24. Evaluating prediction-time batch normalization for robustness under covariate shift. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.10963, 2020.
  25. Tipi: Test time adaptation with transformation invariance.
  26. TIPI: Test Time Adaptation with Transformation Invariance.
  27. Augco: augmentation consistency-guided self-training for source-free domain adaptive semantic segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.10140, 2021.
  28. Playing for data: Ground truth from computer games. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11-14, 2016, Proceedings, Part II 14, pages 102–118. Springer, 2016.
  29. Domain adaptation for object detection via style consistency. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.10033, 2019.
  30. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, pages 234–241. Springer, 2015.
  31. Semi-supervised domain adaptation via minimax entropy. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 8050–8058, 2019.
  32. Acdc: The adverse conditions dataset with correspondences for semantic driving scene understanding. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 10765–10775, 2021.
  33. Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:11539–11551, 2020.
  34. How to train your vit? data, augmentation, and regularization in vision transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10270, 2021.
  35. Test-time training with self-supervision for generalization under distribution shifts. In International conference on machine learning, pages 9229–9248. PMLR, 2020.
  36. Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In International conference on machine learning, pages 6105–6114. PMLR, 2019.
  37. Adversarial discriminative domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 7167–7176, 2017.
  38. Re-using adversarial mask discriminators for test-time training under distribution shifts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.11926, 2021.
  39. On the road to online adaptation for semantic image segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 19184–19195, 2022.
  40. Tent: Fully test-time adaptation by entropy minimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.10726, 2020.
  41. Continual test-time domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7201–7211, 2022.
  42. Test-Time Training on Video Streams.
  43. Ross Wightman. Pytorch image models. https://github.com/rwightman/pytorch-image-models, 2019.
  44. Task driven generative modeling for unsupervised domain adaptation: Application to x-ray image segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2018: 21st International Conference, Granada, Spain, September 16-20, 2018, Proceedings, Part II, pages 599–607. Springer, 2018.
Citations (2)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now