Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
120 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Statistically Adaptive Filtering for Low Signal Correction in X-ray Computed Tomography (2309.13406v1)

Published 23 Sep 2023 in eess.IV and physics.med-ph

Abstract: Low x-ray dose is desirable in x-ray computed tomographic (CT) imaging due to health concerns. But low dose comes with a cost of low signal artifacts such as streaks and low frequency bias in the reconstruction. As a result, low signal correction is needed to help reduce artifacts while retaining relevant anatomical structures. Low signal can be encountered in cases where sufficient number of photons do not reach the detector to have confidence in the recorded data. % NOTE: SNR is ratio of powers, not std. dev. X-ray photons, assumed to have Poisson distribution, have signal to noise ratio proportional to the dose, with poorer SNR in low signal areas. Electronic noise added by the data acquisition system further reduces the signal quality. In this paper we will demonstrate a technique to combat low signal artifacts through adaptive filtration. It entails statistics-based filtering on the uncorrected data, correcting the lower signal areas more aggressively than the high signal ones. We look at local averages to decide how aggressive the filtering should be, and local standard deviation to decide how much detail preservation to apply. Implementation consists of a pre-correction step i.e. local linear minimum mean-squared error correction, followed by a variance stabilizing transform, and finally adaptive bilateral filtering. The coefficients of the bilateral filter are computed using local statistics. Results show that improvements were made in terms of low frequency bias, streaks, local average and standard deviation, modulation transfer function and noise power spectrum.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (14)
  1. Smith-Bindman, R., Lipson, J., Marcus, R., Kim, K.-P., Mahesh, M., Gould, R., De González, A. B., and Miglioretti, D. L., “Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer,” Archives of internal medicine 169(22), 2078–2086 (2009).
  2. de Gonzalez, A. B. and Darby, S., “Risk of cancer from diagnostic x-rays: estimates for the uk and 14 other countries,” The lancet 363(9406), 345–351 (2004).
  3. Kachelrieß, M., Watzke, O., and Kalender, W. A., “Generalized multi-dimensional adaptive filtering for conventional and spiral single-slice, multi-slice, and cone-beam ct,” Medical physics 28(4), 475–490 (2001).
  4. Thibault, J.-B., Bouman, C. A., Sauer, K. D., and Hsieh, J., “A recursive filter for noise reduction in statistical iterative tomographic imaging,” in [Computational Imaging IV ], 6065, 60650X, International Society for Optics and Photonics (2006).
  5. Hsieh, J., “Adaptive streak artifact reduction in computed tomography resulting from excessive x-ray photon noise,” Medical Physics 25(11), 2139–2147 (1998).
  6. Manduca, A., Yu, L., Trzasko, J. D., Khaylova, N., Kofler, J. M., McCollough, C. M., and Fletcher, J. G., “Projection space denoising with bilateral filtering and ct noise modeling for dose reduction in ct,” Medical physics 36(11), 4911–4919 (2009).
  7. Xu, J. and Tsui, B. M., “Electronic noise modeling in statistical iterative reconstruction,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 18(6), 1228–1238 (2009).
  8. Ma, J., Liang, Z., Fan, Y., Liu, Y., Huang, J., Chen, W., and Lu, H., “Variance analysis of x-ray ct sinograms in the presence of electronic noise background,” Medical physics 39(7Part1), 4051–4065 (2012).
  9. Chang, Z., Zhang, R., Thibault, J.-B., Pal, D., Fu, L., Sauer, K., and Bouman, C., “Modeling and pre-treatment of photon-starved ct data for iterative reconstruction,” IEEE transactions on medical imaging 36(1), 277–287 (2016).
  10. Anscombe, F. J., “The transformation of poisson, binomial and negative-binomial data,” Biometrika 35(3/4), 246–254 (1948).
  11. Makitalo, M. and Foi, A., “Optimal inversion of the generalized anscombe transformation for poisson-gaussian noise,” IEEE transactions on image processing 22(1), 91–103 (2012).
  12. Zhang, M. and Gunturk, B. K., “Multiresolution bilateral filtering for image denoising,” IEEE Transactions on image processing 17(12), 2324–2333 (2008).
  13. Lee, T.-C., Zhou, J., and Yu, Z., “Deep learning based adaptive filtering for projection data noise reduction in x-ray computed tomography,” in [15th International Meeting on Fully Three-Dimensional Image Reconstruction in Radiology and Nuclear Medicine ], 11072, 110721D, International Society for Optics and Photonics (2019).
  14. Hayes, J. W., Gomez-Cardona, D., Zhang, R., Li, K., Cruz-Bastida, J. P., and Chen, G.-H., “Low-dose cone-beam ct via raw counts domain low-signal correction schemes: Performance assessment and task-based parameter optimization (part i: Assessment of spatial resolution and noise performance),” Medical physics 45(5), 1942–1956 (2018).

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.