Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Interactive Content Diversity and User Exploration in Online Movie Recommenders: A Field Experiment (2309.13296v1)

Published 23 Sep 2023 in cs.HC and cs.IR

Abstract: Recommender systems often struggle to strike a balance between matching users' tastes and providing unexpected recommendations. When recommendations are too narrow and fail to cover the full range of users' preferences, the system is perceived as useless. Conversely, when the system suggests too many items that users don't like, it is considered impersonal or ineffective. To better understand user sentiment about the breadth of recommendations given by a movie recommender, we conducted interviews and surveys and found out that many users considered narrow recommendations to be useful, while a smaller number explicitly wanted greater breadth. Additionally, we designed and ran an online field experiment with a larger user group, evaluating two new interfaces designed to provide users with greater access to broader recommendations. We looked at user preferences and behavior for two groups of users: those with higher initial movie diversity and those with lower diversity. Among our findings, we discovered that different level of exploration control and users' subjective preferences on interfaces are more predictive of their satisfaction with the recommender.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (61)
  1. \APACrefYearMonthDay2022. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleThe economics of recommender systems: Evidence from a field experiment on movielens The economics of recommender systems: Evidence from a field experiment on movielens.\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesarXiv preprint arXiv:2211.14219. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  2. \APACinsertmetastarbaeza2020bias{APACrefauthors}Baeza-Yates, R.  \APACrefYearMonthDay2020. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleBias in search and recommender systems Bias in search and recommender systems.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems Proceedings of the 14th acm conference on recommender systems (\BPGS 2–2). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  3. \APACrefYearMonthDay1994. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleCollecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper.\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesJournal of Advanced Nursing-Institutional Subscription192328–335. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  4. \APACrefYearMonthDay2022. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleEcho Chambers, Rabbit Holes, and Algorithmic Bias: How YouTube Recommends Content to Real Users Echo chambers, rabbit holes, and algorithmic bias: How youtube recommends content to real users.\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesAvailable at SSRN 4114905. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  5. \APACrefYearMonthDay1998. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleThe use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries The use of mmr, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval Proceedings of the 21st annual international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval (\BPGS 335–336). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  6. \APACrefYearMonthDay2021. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleNovelty and diversity in recommender systems Novelty and diversity in recommender systems.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleRecommender systems handbook Recommender systems handbook (\BPGS 603–646). \APACaddressPublisherSpringer. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  7. \APACrefYearMonthDay2015. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleUsing groups of items for preference elicitation in recommender systems Using groups of items for preference elicitation in recommender systems.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing Proceedings of the 18th acm conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (\BPGS 1258–1269). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  8. \APACrefYearMonthDay2019. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleHow serendipity improves user satisfaction with recommendations? a large-scale user evaluation How serendipity improves user satisfaction with recommendations? a large-scale user evaluation.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleThe world wide web conference The world wide web conference (\BPGS 240–250). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  9. \APACrefYearMonthDay2021. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleValues of User Exploration in Recommender Systems Values of user exploration in recommender systems.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleFifteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems Fifteenth acm conference on recommender systems (\BPGS 85–95). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  10. \APACinsertmetastarcohen1988edition{APACrefauthors}Cohen, J.  \APACrefYearMonthDay1988. \APACrefbtitleedition 2. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. edition 2. statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. \APACaddressPublisherHillsdale. Erlbaum. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  11. \APACrefYearMonthDay2014. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleUser perception of differences in recommender algorithms User perception of differences in recommender algorithms.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender systems Proceedings of the 8th acm conference on recommender systems (\BPGS 161–168). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  12. \APACrefYearMonthDay2015. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleLetting users choose recommender algorithms: An experimental study Letting users choose recommender algorithms: An experimental study.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems Proceedings of the 9th acm conference on recommender systems (\BPGS 11–18). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  13. \APACrefYearMonthDay2016. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleThe influence of users’ personality traits on satisfaction and attractiveness of diversified recommendation lists The influence of users’ personality traits on satisfaction and attractiveness of diversified recommendation lists.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleEMPIRE 2016 Emotions and Personality in Personalized Systems: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Emotions and Personality in Personalized Systems co-located with ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys 2016) Empire 2016 emotions and personality in personalized systems: Proceedings of the 4th workshop on emotions and personality in personalized systems co-located with acm conference on recommender systems (recsys 2016) (\BVOL 1680, \BPGS 43–47). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  14. \APACrefYearMonthDay2007. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleStatistics (international student edition) Statistics (international student edition).\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesPisani, R. Purves, 4th edn. WW Norton & Company, New York. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  15. \APACinsertmetastarfunk2006netflix{APACrefauthors}Funk, S.  \APACrefYearMonthDay2006. \APACrefbtitleNetflix update: Try this at home. Netflix update: Try this at home. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  16. \APACrefYearMonthDay2022. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleMitigating the filter bubble while maintaining relevance: Targeted diversification with VAE-based recommender systems Mitigating the filter bubble while maintaining relevance: Targeted diversification with vae-based recommender systems.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval Proceedings of the 45th international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval (\BPGS 2524–2531). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  17. \APACrefYearMonthDay2018. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleUnderstanding and evaluating user satisfaction with music discovery Understanding and evaluating user satisfaction with music discovery.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleThe 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval The 41st international acm sigir conference on research & development in information retrieval (\BPGS 55–64). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  18. \APACrefYearMonthDay2013. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleBringing diversity to recommendation lists–an analysis of the placement of diverse items Bringing diversity to recommendation lists–an analysis of the placement of diverse items.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleEnterprise Information Systems: 14th International Conference, ICEIS 2012, Wroclaw, Poland, June 28-July 1, 2012, Revised Selected Papers 14 Enterprise information systems: 14th international conference, iceis 2012, wroclaw, poland, june 28-july 1, 2012, revised selected papers 14 (\BPGS 293–305). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  19. \APACrefYearMonthDay2004. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleRemodeling grounded theory Remodeling grounded theory.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleForum qualitative sozialforschung/forum: qualitative social research Forum qualitative sozialforschung/forum: qualitative social research (\BVOL 5). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  20. \APACrefYearMonthDay2018. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleBurst of the filter bubble? Effects of personalization on the diversity of Google News Burst of the filter bubble? effects of personalization on the diversity of google news.\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesDigital journalism63330–343. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  21. \APACrefYearMonthDay1979. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleAlgorithm AS 136: A k-means clustering algorithm Algorithm as 136: A k-means clustering algorithm.\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesJournal of the royal statistical society. series c (applied statistics)281100–108. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  22. \APACrefYearMonthDay2011. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleNovelty and diversity in top-n recommendation–analysis and evaluation Novelty and diversity in top-n recommendation–analysis and evaluation.\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT)1041–30. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  23. \APACrefYearMonthDay2021. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleA survey on conversational recommender systems A survey on conversational recommender systems.\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)5451–36. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  24. \APACrefYearMonthDay2022. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleIntra-list similarity and human diversity perceptions of recommendations: the details matter Intra-list similarity and human diversity perceptions of recommendations: the details matter.\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesUser Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction1–34. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  25. \APACrefYearMonthDay2023. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleCollaborative Online Learning with VR Video: Roles of Collaborative Tools and Shared Video Control Collaborative online learning with vr video: Roles of collaborative tools and shared video control.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Proceedings of the 2023 chi conference on human factors in computing systems (\BPGS 1–18). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  26. \APACrefYearMonthDay2021. \BBOQ\APACrefatitlePreference amplification in recommender systems Preference amplification in recommender systems.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining Proceedings of the 27th acm sigkdd conference on knowledge discovery & data mining (\BPGS 805–815). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  27. \APACrefYearMonthDay2016. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleDiversity, serendipity, novelty, and coverage: a survey and empirical analysis of beyond-accuracy objectives in recommender systems Diversity, serendipity, novelty, and coverage: a survey and empirical analysis of beyond-accuracy objectives in recommender systems.\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS)711–42. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  28. \APACrefYearMonthDay2018. \BBOQ\APACrefatitlePersonality, user preferences and behavior in recommender systems Personality, user preferences and behavior in recommender systems.\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesInformation Systems Frontiers201241–1265. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  29. \APACrefYearMonthDay2010. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleOrdinal logistic regression Ordinal logistic regression.\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesLogistic regression: A self-learning text463–488. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  30. \APACrefYearMonthDay2012. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleExplaining the user experience of recommender systems Explaining the user experience of recommender systems.\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesUser modeling and user-adapted interaction224441–504. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  31. \APACrefYearMonthDay2022. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleMulti-Objective Personalization in Multi-Stakeholder Organizational Bulk E-mail: A Field Experiment Multi-objective personalization in multi-stakeholder organizational bulk e-mail: A field experiment.\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction6CSCW21–27. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  32. \APACrefYearMonthDay2020. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleClusterExplorer: Enable User Control over Related Recommendations via Collaborative Filtering and Clustering Clusterexplorer: Enable user control over related recommendations via collaborative filtering and clustering.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems Proceedings of the 14th acm conference on recommender systems (\BPGS 432–437). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  33. \APACrefYearMonthDay2010. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleTemporal diversity in recommender systems Temporal diversity in recommender systems.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval Proceedings of the 33rd international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval (\BPGS 210–217). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  34. \APACrefYear2017. \APACrefbtitleResearch methods in human-computer interaction Research methods in human-computer interaction. \APACaddressPublisherMorgan Kaufmann. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  35. \APACinsertmetastarliang2019recommender{APACrefauthors}Liang, Y.  \APACrefYearMonthDay2019. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleRecommender system for developing new preferences and goals Recommender system for developing new preferences and goals.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems Proceedings of the 13th acm conference on recommender systems (\BPGS 611–615). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  36. \APACrefYearMonthDay2021. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleExamining political bias within youtube search and recommendation algorithms Examining political bias within youtube search and recommendation algorithms.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitle2021 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) 2021 ieee symposium series on computational intelligence (ssci) (\BPGS 1–7). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  37. \APACrefYearMonthDay2018. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleExplore, exploit, and explain: personalizing explainable recommendations with bandits Explore, exploit, and explain: personalizing explainable recommendations with bandits.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 12th ACM conference on recommender systems Proceedings of the 12th acm conference on recommender systems (\BPGS 31–39). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  38. \APACrefYearMonthDay2006. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleMaking recommendations better: an analytic model for human-recommender interaction Making recommendations better: an analytic model for human-recommender interaction.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleCHI’06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems Chi’06 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (\BPGS 1103–1108). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  39. \APACrefYearMonthDay2020. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleOptimizing long-term social welfare in recommender systems: A constrained matching approach Optimizing long-term social welfare in recommender systems: A constrained matching approach.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleInternational Conference on Machine Learning International conference on machine learning (\BPGS 6987–6998). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  40. \APACinsertmetastarmuller2014curiosity{APACrefauthors}Muller, M.  \APACrefYearMonthDay2014. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleCuriosity, creativity, and surprise as analytic tools: Grounded theory method Curiosity, creativity, and surprise as analytic tools: Grounded theory method.\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesWays of Knowing in HCI25–48. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  41. \APACrefYearMonthDay2014. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleExploring the filter bubble: the effect of using recommender systems on content diversity Exploring the filter bubble: the effect of using recommender systems on content diversity.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on world wide web (\BPGS 677–686). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  42. \APACrefYearMonthDay2014. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleRecommender systems challenge 2014 Recommender systems challenge 2014.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems Proceedings of the 8th acm conference on recommender systems (\BPGS 387–388). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  43. \APACrefYearMonthDay2001. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleItem-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web Proceedings of the 10th international conference on world wide web (\BPGS 285–295). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  44. \APACrefYearMonthDay2018. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleShort-term satisfaction and long-term coverage: Understanding how users tolerate algorithmic exploration Short-term satisfaction and long-term coverage: Understanding how users tolerate algorithmic exploration.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining Proceedings of the eleventh acm international conference on web search and data mining (\BPGS 513–521). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  45. \APACrefYearMonthDay2019. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleRole of fairness, accountability, and transparency in algorithmic affordance Role of fairness, accountability, and transparency in algorithmic affordance.\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesComputers in Human Behavior98277–284. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  46. \APACrefYearMonthDay2022. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleMulti-armed bandits in recommendation systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and future directions Multi-armed bandits in recommendation systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and future directions.\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesExpert Systems with Applications197116669. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  47. \APACrefYearMonthDay2001. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleSimilarity vs. diversity Similarity vs. diversity.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleCase-Based Reasoning Research and Development: 4th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, ICCBR 2001 Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 30–August 2, 2001 Proceedings 4 Case-based reasoning research and development: 4th international conference on case-based reasoning, iccbr 2001 vancouver, bc, canada, july 30–august 2, 2001 proceedings 4 (\BPGS 347–361). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  48. \APACrefYearMonthDay2018. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleMovieexplorer: building an interactive exploration tool from ratings and latent taste spaces Movieexplorer: building an interactive exploration tool from ratings and latent taste spaces.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing Proceedings of the 33rd annual acm symposium on applied computing (\BPGS 1383–1392). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  49. \APACrefYearMonthDay2022. \BBOQ\APACrefatitlePreference diversity and openness to novelty: Scales construction from the perspective of movie recommendation Preference diversity and openness to novelty: Scales construction from the perspective of movie recommendation.\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology7391222–1235. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  50. \APACrefYearMonthDay2017. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleThematic analysis Thematic analysis.\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesThe SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology217–37. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  51. \APACrefYearMonthDay2014. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleCoverage, redundancy and size-awareness in genre diversity for recommender systems Coverage, redundancy and size-awareness in genre diversity for recommender systems.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender systems Proceedings of the 8th acm conference on recommender systems (\BPGS 209–216). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  52. \APACrefYearMonthDay2012. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleThe tag genome: Encoding community knowledge to support novel interaction The tag genome: Encoding community knowledge to support novel interaction.\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS)231–44. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  53. \APACrefYearMonthDay2020. \BBOQ\APACrefatitlePersonalized re-ranking for improving diversity in live recommender systems Personalized re-ranking for improving diversity in live recommender systems.\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesarXiv preprint arXiv:2004.06390. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  54. \APACrefYearMonthDay2017. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleReturning is believing: Optimizing long-term user engagement in recommender systems Returning is believing: Optimizing long-term user engagement in recommender systems.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management Proceedings of the 2017 acm on conference on information and knowledge management (\BPGS 1927–1936). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  55. \APACrefYearMonthDay2020. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleAttention-based context-aware sequential recommendation model Attention-based context-aware sequential recommendation model.\BBCQ \APACjournalVolNumPagesInformation Sciences510122–134. \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  56. \APACrefYearMonthDay2012. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleAuralist: introducing serendipity into music recommendation Auralist: introducing serendipity into music recommendation.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the fift@inproceedingssmyth2001similarity, title=Similarity vs. diversity, author=Smyth, Barry and McClave, Paul, booktitle=Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development: 4th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, ICCBR 2001 Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 30–August 2, 2001 Proceedings 4, pages=347–361, year=2001, organization=Springer h ACM international conference on Web search and data mining Proceedings of the fift@inproceedingssmyth2001similarity, title=Similarity vs. diversity, author=Smyth, Barry and McClave, Paul, booktitle=Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development: 4th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, ICCBR 2001 Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 30–August 2, 2001 Proceedings 4, pages=347–361, year=2001, organization=Springer h acm international conference on web search and data mining (\BPGS 13–22). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  57. \APACrefYearMonthDay2016. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleGroup preference aggregation: A nash equilibrium approach Group preference aggregation: A nash equilibrium approach.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitle2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) 2016 ieee 16th international conference on data mining (icdm) (\BPGS 679–688). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  58. \APACrefYearMonthDay2017. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleToward better interactions in recommender systems: Cycling and serpentining approaches for top-n item lists Toward better interactions in recommender systems: Cycling and serpentining approaches for top-n item lists.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing Proceedings of the 2017 acm conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing (\BPGS 1444–1453). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  59. \APACrefYearMonthDay2018. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleExplicit or implicit feedback? Engagement or satisfaction? A field experiment on machine-learning-based recommender systems Explicit or implicit feedback? engagement or satisfaction? a field experiment on machine-learning-based recommender systems.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing Proceedings of the 33rd annual acm symposium on applied computing (\BPGS 1331–1340). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  60. \APACrefYearMonthDay2005. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleImproving recommendation lists through topic diversification Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web Proceedings of the 14th international conference on world wide web (\BPGS 22–32). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
  61. \APACrefYearMonthDay2019. \BBOQ\APACrefatitleReinforcement learning to optimize long-term user engagement in recommender systems Reinforcement learning to optimize long-term user engagement in recommender systems.\BBCQ \BIn \APACrefbtitleProceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining Proceedings of the 25th acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining (\BPGS 2810–2818). \PrintBackRefs\CurrentBib
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Ruixuan Sun (7 papers)
  2. Avinash Akella (3 papers)
  3. Ruoyan Kong (12 papers)
  4. Moyan Zhou (3 papers)
  5. Joseph A. Konstan (11 papers)
Citations (3)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that allowing users to adjust exploration levels enhances user satisfaction and engagement.
  • It employs interviews, surveys, and a large-scale field experiment to reveal varying preferences for recommendation diversity.
  • The study shows that adaptive interface designs can effectively balance personalized suggestions with broader exploratory options.

The paper, "Interactive Content Diversity and User Exploration in Online Movie Recommenders: A Field Experiment," tackles the challenge of balancing personalization and diversity in movie recommender systems. Recommender systems often face difficulties in striking a balance between providing personalized suggestions that align closely with users' existing preferences and offering diverse recommendations that can help explore new interests.

Key Findings:

  1. User Preferences on Recommendation Breadth:
    • Interviews and surveys revealed a mixed sentiment towards recommendation breadth. Many users appreciated narrower, highly personalized suggestions, viewing them as useful. However, a notable minority expressed a desire for recommendations with greater diversity.
  2. Impact of Exploration Control:
    • The paper highlights the importance of exploration control. Users' satisfaction with the recommender system is significantly influenced by the ability to control the degree of exploration offered through the interface. Different user groups, characterized by their initial diversity of movie preferences, showed variations in how much control they preferred.
  3. Field Experiment and Interface Design:
    • The authors conducted a large-scale online field experiment testing two new interface designs. These interfaces aimed to broaden the range of recommendations accessible to users. The changes targeted increasing user engagement by allowing them to explore beyond their usual preferences.
  4. User Groups and Diversity:
    • Users were divided into two groups based on their initial diversity in movie preferences: those with higher diversity and those with lower diversity. The experiment revealed that the levels of exploration desired and the subjective preferences regarding interface design varied between these groups. Users with initially diverse tastes reacted positively towards interfaces offering broader exploration.

Implications:

The paper suggests that recommender systems can benefit from personalized interfaces that allow users to adjust the diversity of recommendations. This personalization not only enhances user satisfaction but also potentially increases engagement by catering to individual preferences related to exploration. By enabling users to control the extent of recommendation diversity, systems can better cater to a broader range of user expectations and satisfaction levels.

This research contributes to the understanding of how interface design and user control over exploration can play critical roles in improving the effectiveness of recommendation systems, especially in the context of the entertainment industry like movie recommenders.