Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Physics-informed State-space Neural Networks for Transport Phenomena (2309.12211v2)

Published 21 Sep 2023 in cs.LG, cs.SY, eess.SY, physics.comp-ph, and physics.flu-dyn

Abstract: This work introduces Physics-informed State-space neural network Models (PSMs), a novel solution to achieving real-time optimization, flexibility, and fault tolerance in autonomous systems, particularly in transport-dominated systems such as chemical, biomedical, and power plants. Traditional data-driven methods fall short due to a lack of physical constraints like mass conservation; PSMs address this issue by training deep neural networks with sensor data and physics-informing using components' Partial Differential Equations (PDEs), resulting in a physics-constrained, end-to-end differentiable forward dynamics model. Through two in silico experiments -- a heated channel and a cooling system loop -- we demonstrate that PSMs offer a more accurate approach than a purely data-driven model. In the former experiment, PSMs demonstrated significantly lower average root-mean-square errors across test datasets compared to a purely data-driven neural network, with reductions of 44 %, 48 %, and 94 % in predicting pressure, velocity, and temperature, respectively. Beyond accuracy, PSMs demonstrate a compelling multitask capability, making them highly versatile. In this work, we showcase two: supervisory control of a nonlinear system through a sequentially updated state-space representation and the proposal of a diagnostic algorithm using residuals from each of the PDEs. The former demonstrates PSMs' ability to handle constant and time-dependent constraints, while the latter illustrates their value in system diagnostics and fault detection. We further posit that PSMs could serve as a foundation for Digital Twins, constantly updated digital representations of physical systems.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (28)
  1. The autonomous industrial plant–future of process engineering, operations and maintenance. Journal of Process Control, 88:101–110, 2020.
  2. Laurence A Belfiore. Transport phenomena for chemical reactor design. John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
  3. Ronald L Fournier. Basic transport phenomena in biomedical engineering. CRC press, 2011.
  4. Transport Phenomena, volume 1. John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
  5. Nuclear systems volume I: Thermal hydraulic fundamentals. CRC press, 2021.
  6. Claudio Mattiussi. An analysis of finite volume, finite element, and finite difference methods using some concepts from algebraic topology. Journal of Computational Physics, 133(2):289–309, 1997.
  7. J Richalet. Industrial applications of model based predictive control. Automatica, 29(5):1251–1274, 1993.
  8. From model-based control to data-driven control: Survey, classification and perspective. Information Sciences, 235:3–35, 2013.
  9. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational physics, 378:686–707, 2019.
  10. Scientific Machine Learning Through Physics–Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What’s Next. Journal of Scientific Computing, 92(3):88, July 2022. ISSN 1573-7691. doi:10.1007/s10915-022-01939-z.
  11. State–space modeling for control based on physics-informed neural networks. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 101:104195, 2021.
  12. Rui Hu. An advanced one-dimensional finite element model for incompressible thermally expandable flow. Nuclear Technology, 190(3):313–322, 2015.
  13. Rui Hu. SAM Theory Manual. Technical report, Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States), March 2017. URL http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1353375/.
  14. Raúl Rojas. The backpropagation algorithm. Neural networks: a systematic introduction, pages 149–182, 1996.
  15. Sensor selection via convex optimization. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 57(2):451–462, 2008.
  16. Real-world data-driven machine-learning-based optimal sensor selection approach for equipment fault detection in a thermal power plant. Mathematics, 9(21):2814, 2021.
  17. Physics informed deep learning (part i): Data-driven solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.10561, 2017.
  18. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
  19. A comprehensive survey of loss functions in machine learning. Annals of Data Science, pages 1–26, 2020.
  20. Efficient backprop. In Neural networks: Tricks of the trade, pages 9–50. Springer, 2002.
  21. Thomas E Rehm. Advanced nuclear energy: the safest and most renewable clean energy. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 39:100878, 2023.
  22. Fluoride salt coolant properties for nuclear reactor applications: A review. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 109:635–647, 2017.
  23. Reference and command governors for systems with constraints. Automatica, 75:306–328, 2017. ISSN 00051098. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2016.08.013.
  24. CVXPY: A Python-embedded modeling language for convex optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17(83):1–5, 2016.
  25. Janos Gertler. Fault detection and diagnosis in engineering systems. CRC press, 2017.
  26. Rolf Isermann. Model-based fault-detection and diagnosis–status and applications. Annual Reviews in control, 29(1):71–85, 2005.
  27. A physics-based parametric regression approach for feedwater pump system diagnosis. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 166, 2022. doi:10.1016/J.ANUCENE.2021.108692.
  28. Characterising the digital twin: A systematic literature review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 29:36–52, 2020.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.