Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Popularity Degradation Bias in Local Music Recommendation (2309.11671v1)

Published 20 Sep 2023 in cs.IR and cs.LG

Abstract: In this paper, we study the effect of popularity degradation bias in the context of local music recommendations. Specifically, we examine how accurate two top-performing recommendation algorithms, Weight Relevance Matrix Factorization (WRMF) and Multinomial Variational Autoencoder (Mult-VAE), are at recommending artists as a function of artist popularity. We find that both algorithms improve recommendation performance for more popular artists and, as such, exhibit popularity degradation bias. While both algorithms produce a similar level of performance for more popular artists, Mult-VAE shows better relative performance for less popular artists. This suggests that this algorithm should be preferred for local (long-tail) music artist recommendation.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (18)
  1. C. Anderson. 2004. The Long Tail. Wired Magazine (2004). http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.10/tail.html
  2. Community Well-Being, Post-Industrial Music Cities and the Turn to Popular Music Heritage. In Music Cities. Springer, 43–61.
  3. Are we really making much progress? A worrying analysis of recent neural recommendation approaches. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 101–109.
  4. Titan Music Group (Firm). 2015. The Austin Music Census: A Data-Driven Assessment of Austin’s Commercial Music Economy. Titan Music Group, LLC. https://books.google.com/books?id=fStOjwEACAAJ
  5. Leo A Goodman. 1961. Snowball Sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32, 1 (1961), 148–170.
  6. Neural collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web. 173–182.
  7. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. Ieee, 263–272.
  8. Diederik Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2015. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). San Diega, CA, USA.
  9. Variational autoencoders for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 2018 world wide web conference. 689–698.
  10. Xia Ning and George Karypis. 2011. Slim: Sparse Linear Methods for Top-N Recommender Systems. In 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE, 497–506.
  11. Steve Oakes and Gary Warnaby. 2011. Conceptualizing the Management and Consumption of Live Music in Urban Space. Marketing Theory 11, 4 (2011), 405–418.
  12. Neural collaborative filtering vs. matrix factorization revisited. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 240–248.
  13. Music Recommendation Systems: Techniques, Use Cases, and Challenges. In Recommender Systems Handbook (3rd edition), Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach, and Bracha Shapira (Eds.). Springer, New York, NY, 927–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2197-4_24
  14. Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. The journal of machine learning research 15, 1 (2014), 1929–1958.
  16. Harald Steck. 2011. Item popularity and recommendation accuracy. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems. 125–132.
  17. Localify.org: Locally-focus Music Artist and Event Recommendation. In 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys 2023.
  18. Towards Quantifying the Strength of Music Scenes Using Live Event Data. Population 18 (2022), 21.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.