Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Multimodal Foundation Models: From Specialists to General-Purpose Assistants (2309.10020v1)

Published 18 Sep 2023 in cs.CV and cs.CL

Abstract: This paper presents a comprehensive survey of the taxonomy and evolution of multimodal foundation models that demonstrate vision and vision-language capabilities, focusing on the transition from specialist models to general-purpose assistants. The research landscape encompasses five core topics, categorized into two classes. (i) We start with a survey of well-established research areas: multimodal foundation models pre-trained for specific purposes, including two topics -- methods of learning vision backbones for visual understanding and text-to-image generation. (ii) Then, we present recent advances in exploratory, open research areas: multimodal foundation models that aim to play the role of general-purpose assistants, including three topics -- unified vision models inspired by LLMs, end-to-end training of multimodal LLMs, and chaining multimodal tools with LLMs. The target audiences of the paper are researchers, graduate students, and professionals in computer vision and vision-language multimodal communities who are eager to learn the basics and recent advances in multimodal foundation models.

Multimodal Foundation Models: From Specialists to General-Purpose Assistants

The paper under scrutiny offers a detailed exploration of multimodal foundation models, particularly those demonstrating capabilities in both vision and vision-language tasks. These models have advanced from being narrowly focused, specialized models to becoming more general-purpose assistants. The breadth of the research covers five core topics which are categorized into established and emerging areas of research.

Initially, the paper explores well-established research areas, such as multimodal foundation models specifically pre-trained for particular tasks. These include methods of learning vision backbones that facilitate visual understanding, alongside techniques relevant to text-to-image generation. There is a foundational understanding, strongly supported by previous research, that image representation learning is segmented into distinct categories based on the supervision type, namely, supervised learning, language supervision, and image-only self-supervised learning. The paper highlights that language supervision through models like CLIP, ALIGN, and OpenCLIP has enabled advancement in zero-shot image classification and image-text retrieval tasks.

Interestingly, the authors note that contrastive language-image pre-training forms a pivotal part of these discussions, with models prompting exploratory paper on varying data sizes and modalities. This research underscores the role of contrastive learning in mapping and interpreting data pairs, examining the CLIP model's architecture and scalability in detail, and contrasting it with the generative captioning loss.

The scope extends further into self-supervised learning methods; here, the focus is on both contrastive and non-contrastive learning strategies and masked image modeling, such as BEiT and MAE models. This analysis comes within the context of evaluating how these models perform when extended beyond single modalities to embrace embodied multimodal interactions.

Furthermore, the topic evolves toward newer areas of research, emphasizing the transition of these foundational models towards becoming general-purpose assistants akin to LLMs in NLP contexts. The paper speculates on the transformation of vision-LLMs inspired by LLMs’ unification spirit, evident in works such as SAM and SEEM, which leverage capabilities for segmentation and open-vocabulary tasks, indicating a shift towards interactive and promptable models.

The conceptual structure suggests a potential pathway for these models to evolve into entities capable of performing a broad array of tasks akin to those human generalists might undertake. Such an evolution is not only supported by advanced model architecture but also by the integration with LLMs, suggesting an alignment toward human interaction and task completion in unpremeditated settings.

Crucially, the implications of this research traverse both theoretical and practical domains. These models' escalating performance and adaptability offer significant promise in myriad applications, spanning real-world deployment scenarios that require sophisticated interaction and understanding of visual and linguistic data. The research trajectory is moving swiftly towards creating AI agents with profound capabilities in interpreting and generating multimodal content.

The paper suggests that while substantial strides have been made, the pathway is open for further innovations aimed at blending visual, linguistic, and additional sensory modalities. As researchers contemplate future developments, the focus will likely be on constructing even more comprehensive AI systems, increasingly integrated into our daily lives, showing substantial promise for furthering human-AI collaboration.

In conclusion, the paper provides a meticulously detailed survey of the narratives around multimodal foundation models, exploring their pathways from specialist tools to versatile assistants. The insights and results discussed hold substantial weight for both ongoing research and practical applications, highlighting the burgeoning intersection of AI capabilities and human interaction paradigms. The collective advance toward AI systems that emerge more capable and adaptable heralds a new era in multimodal comprehension and contribution, potentially revolutionizing how both researchers and practitioners leverage AI in the years to come.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Chunyuan Li (122 papers)
  2. Zhe Gan (135 papers)
  3. Zhengyuan Yang (86 papers)
  4. Jianwei Yang (93 papers)
  5. Linjie Li (89 papers)
  6. Lijuan Wang (133 papers)
  7. Jianfeng Gao (344 papers)
Citations (176)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com