Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Promoting Research Collaboration with Open Data Driven Team Recommendation in Response to Call for Proposals (2309.09404v5)

Published 18 Sep 2023 in cs.AI

Abstract: Building teams and promoting collaboration are two very common business activities. An example of these are seen in the TeamingForFunding problem, where research institutions and researchers are interested to identify collaborative opportunities when applying to funding agencies in response to latter's calls for proposals. We describe a novel system to recommend teams using a variety of AI methods, such that (1) each team achieves the highest possible skill coverage that is demanded by the opportunity, and (2) the workload of distributing the opportunities is balanced amongst the candidate members. We address these questions by extracting skills latent in open data of proposal calls (demand) and researcher profiles (supply), normalizing them using taxonomies, and creating efficient algorithms that match demand to supply. We create teams to maximize goodness along a novel metric balancing short- and long-term objectives. We validate the success of our algorithms (1) quantitatively, by evaluating the recommended teams using a goodness score and find that more informed methods lead to recommendations of smaller number of teams but higher goodness, and (2) qualitatively, by conducting a large-scale user study at a college-wide level, and demonstrate that users overall found the tool very useful and relevant. Lastly, we evaluate our system in two diverse settings in US and India (of researchers and proposal calls) to establish generality of our approach, and deploy it at a major US university for routine use.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (35)
  1. Managing popularity bias in recommender systems with personalized re-ranking. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.07555.
  2. ACM. 2012. ACM Classification Scheme. https://www.acm.org/publications/computing-classification-system/how-to-use. Accessed: 2023-12-01.
  3. Multi-objective optimization and decision making approaches to cricket team selection. Applied Soft Computing, 13(1): 402–414.
  4. An artificial intelligence tool for heterogeneous team formation in the classroom. Knowledge-Based Systems, 101: 1–14.
  5. Group Recommendation: Semantics and Efficiency. Proc. VLDB Endow., 2(1): 754–765.
  6. Online team formation in social networks. In Proc. 21st international conference on WWW.
  7. Fractional Hedonic Games. TEAC.
  8. Groups Identification and Individual Recommendations in Group Recommendation Algorithms. In PRSAT@ recsys, 27–34.
  9. A consensus-driven group recommender system. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 30(8): 887–906.
  10. Team formation in software engineering: a systematic mapping study. IEEE, 8.
  11. Performance of recommender algorithms on top-n recommendation tasks. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conf. on Rec. Sys., 39–46.
  12. Multi-criteria assessment and ranking system of sport team formation based on objective-measured values of criteria set. Expert Systems with Applns., 41(14): 6106–6113.
  13. The use of search-based optimization techniques to schedule and staff software projects: an approach and an empirical study. Software: Practice and Experience, 41(5): 495–519.
  14. Training conditional random fields via gradient tree boosting. In Proc. 21st ICML, 28.
  15. DST. 2023. Department of Science & Technology. Government of India — Ministry of Science and Technology.
  16. Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting (with discussion and a rejoinder by the authors). The Annals of statistics, 28(2): 337–407.
  17. Computing stable outcomes in hedonic games. In Algorithmic Game Theory: 3rd International Symposium, SAGT 2010, 174–185. Springer.
  18. Agent-Organized Networks for Dynamic Team Formation. In Proc. AAMAS, 230–237. ACM. ISBN 1595930930.
  19. Dynamic heterogeneous team formation for robotic urban search and rescue. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 81(3): 553–567.
  20. Expertise diversity, informal leadership hierarchy, and team knowledge creation: A study of pharmaceutical research collaborations. Organization Studies, 43(6): 907–930.
  21. A Comprehensive Review and a Taxonomy Proposal of Team Formation Problems. ACM Computing Survey, 54(7).
  22. Relational boosted bandits. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on AI, 13, 12123–12130.
  23. Entrepreneurial team formation. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1): 29–59.
  24. Fair team recommendations for multidisciplinary projects. In IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, 293–297.
  25. Ethnic diversity and creativity in small groups. Small group research, 27(2): 248–264.
  26. Teaming: an approach to the growing complexities in health care: AOA critical issues. JBJS, 96(21): e184.
  27. A global teaming model for global software development governance: A case study. In 2016 IEEE 11th ICGSE.
  28. How to Form a Task-Oriented Robust Team. In AAMAS, 395–403.
  29. Exploiting group recommendation functions for flexible preferences. In 2014 IEEE 30th ICDE.
  30. ULTRA: A Data-driven Approach for Recommending Team Formation in Response to Proposal Calls. In IEEE ICDM Workshops 2022.
  31. A survey of collaborative filtering techniques. Advances in AI, 2009.
  32. Trope, E. 2023. Why Small Team Collaboration Usually Beats Larger Groups. Ambition & Balance, undated.
  33. ULTRA Resources Github. https://github.com/ai4society/ULTRA-Team-Recommendation-Resources. Accessed: 2023-05-31.
  34. Teaming up in entrepreneurship education: does the team formation mode matter? IJEBR.
  35. Evaluating unfairness of popularity bias in recommender systems: A comprehensive user-centric analysis. Info. Proc. & Mgmt., 59(6): 103100.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.