Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Quantitative Analysis of Forecasting Models:In the Aspect of Online Political Bias (2309.05589v2)

Published 11 Sep 2023 in cs.SI, cs.CY, and cs.LG

Abstract: Understanding and mitigating political bias in online social media platforms are crucial tasks to combat misinformation and echo chamber effects. However, characterizing political bias temporally using computational methods presents challenges due to the high frequency of noise in social media datasets. While existing research has explored various approaches to political bias characterization, the ability to forecast political bias and anticipate how political conversations might evolve in the near future has not been extensively studied. In this paper, we propose a heuristic approach to classify social media posts into five distinct political leaning categories. Since there is a lack of prior work on forecasting political bias, we conduct an in-depth analysis of existing baseline models to identify which model best fits to forecast political leaning time series. Our approach involves utilizing existing time series forecasting models on two social media datasets with different political ideologies, specifically Twitter and Gab. Through our experiments and analyses, we seek to shed light on the challenges and opportunities in forecasting political bias in social media platforms. Ultimately, our work aims to pave the way for developing more effective strategies to mitigate the negative impact of political bias in the digital realm.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (14)
  1. M. D. Vicario, W. Quattrociocchi, A. Scala, and F. Zollo, “Polarization and fake news: Early warning of potential misinformation targets,” ACM TWEB, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–22, 2019.
  2. V. R. K. Garimella and I. Weber, “A long-term analysis of polarization on twitter,” in AAAI ICWSM, vol. 11, no. 1, 2017, pp. 528–531.
  3. F. Bonchi, E. Galimberti, A. Gionis, B. Ordozgoiti, and G. Ruffo, “Discovering polarized communities in signed networks,” in ACM CIKM, 2019, pp. 961–970.
  4. J. Jiang, X. Ren, and E. Ferrara, “Retweet-bert: political leaning detection using language features and information diffusion on social networks,” in AAAI ICWSM, vol. 17, 2023, pp. 459–469.
  5. P. Hajare, S. Kamal, S. Krishnan, and A. Bagavathi, “A machine learning pipeline to examine political bias with congressional speeches,” in IEEE ICMLA, 2021, pp. 239–243.
  6. M. Efron, “Using cocitation information to estimate political orientation in web documents,” KIS, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 492–511, 2006.
  7. M. Cardaioli, P. Kaliyar, P. Capuozzo, M. Conti, G. Sartori, and M. Monaro, “Predicting twitter users’ political orientation: an application to the italian political scenario,” in ASONAM.   IEEE, 2020, pp. 159–165.
  8. A. C. Türkmen and A. T. Cemgil, “Political interest and tendency prediction from microblog data,” in IEEE SIU, 2014, pp. 1327–1330.
  9. K. E. Yilmaz and O. Abul, “Inferring political alignments of twitter users,” in ISNCC, 2018, pp. 1–6.
  10. K. W. Ng, S. Horawalavithana, and A. Iamnitchi, “Social media activity forecasting with exogenous and endogenous signals,” SNAM, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 102, 2022.
  11. K. W. Ng, F. Mubang, L. O. Hall, J. Skvoretz, and A. Iamnitchi, “Experimental evaluation of baselines for forecasting social media timeseries,” EPJ Data Science, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 8, 2023.
  12. G. Brena, M. Brambilla, S. Ceri, M. Di Giovanni, F. Pierri, and G. Ramponi, “News sharing user behaviour on twitter: A comprehensive data collection of news articles and social interactions,” in AAAI ICWSM, vol. 13, 2019, pp. 592–597.
  13. C. Hutto and E. Gilbert, “Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text,” in AAAI ICWSM, vol. 8, no. 1, 2014, pp. 216–225.
  14. A. M. Lamb, A. G. ALIAS PARTH GOYAL, Y. Zhang, S. Zhang, A. C. Courville, and Y. Bengio, “Professor forcing: A new algorithm for training recurrent networks,” NIPS, vol. 29, 2016.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Srinath Sai Tripuraneni (1 paper)
  2. Sadia Kamal (7 papers)
  3. Arunkumar Bagavathi (18 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.