Project-Fair and Truthful Mechanisms for Budget Aggregation (2309.02613v2)
Abstract: We study the budget aggregation problem in which a set of strategic voters must split a finite divisible resource (such as money or time) among a set of competing projects. Our goal is twofold: We seek truthful mechanisms that provide fairness guarantees to the projects. For the first objective, we focus on the class of moving phantom mechanisms [Freeman et al., 2021], which are -- to this day -- essentially the only known truthful mechanisms in this setting. For project fairness, we consider the mean division as a fair baseline, and bound the maximum difference between the funding received by any project and this baseline. We propose a novel and simple moving phantom mechanism that provides optimal project fairness guarantees. As a corollary of our results, we show that our new mechanism minimizes the $\ell_1$ distance to the mean (a measure suggested by Caragiannis et al. [2022]) for three projects and gives the first non-trivial bounds on this quantity for more than three projects.
- Portioning using ordinal preferences: Fairness and efficiency. Artificial Intelligence, 314:103809, 2023.
- H. Aziz and N. Shah. Participatory budgeting: Models and approaches. Pathways Between Social Science and Computational Social Science: Theories, Methods, and Interpretations, pages 215–236, 2021.
- Strategyproof and proportionally fair facility location. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.01566, 2021.
- Generalized median voter schemes and committees. Journal of Economic Theory, 61(2):262–289, 1993.
- Voting under constraints. Journal of Economic Theory, 76(2):298–321, 1997.
- Collective choice under dichotomous preferences. Journal of Economic Theory, 122(2):165–184, 2005.
- Straightforward elections, unanimity and phantom voters. The Review of Economic Studies, 50(1):153–170, 1983.
- Distribution rules under dichotomous preferences: Two out of three ain’t bad. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 158–179, 2021.
- Y. Cabannes. Participatory budgeting: a significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environment and urbanization, 16(1):27–46, 2004.
- Truthful univariate estimators. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 127–135, 2016.
- Truthful aggregation of budget proposals with proportionality guarantees. In Proceedings of the 36th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 4917–4924, 2022.
- Settling the score: Portioning with cardinal preferences. In Proceedings of the 26th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 621–628. 2023.
- The core of the participatory budgeting problem. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Web and Internet Economics, pages 384–399, 2016.
- Truthful aggregation of budget proposals. Journal of Economic Theory, 193:105234, 2021.
- Knapsack voting for participatory budgeting. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, 7(2):1–27, 2019.
- Low Sample Complexity Participatory Budgeting. In Proceedings of the 50th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, pages 70:1–70:20, 2023.
- New characterizations of strategy-proofness under single-peakedness. Mathematical Programming, pages 1–32, 2023.
- Allocating public goods via the midpoint rule. In Proceedings of the 9th International Meeting of the Society for Social Choice and Welfare, 2008.
- Price of fairness in budget division and probabilistic social choice. In Proceedings of the 34th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 2184–2191, 2020.
- H. Moulin. On strategy-proofness and single peakedness. Public Choice, pages 437–455, 1980.
- K. Nehring and C. Puppe. Resource allocation by frugal majority rule. Technical report, KIT Working Paper Series in Economics, 2019.
- Pareto optimality, anonymity, and strategy-proofness in location problems. International Journal of Game Theory, 21:221–235, 1992.
- A. D. Procaccia and M. Tennenholtz. Approximate mechanism design without money. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, 1(4):1–26, 2013.
- R. Renault and A. Trannoy. Protecting minorities through the average voting rule. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 7(2):169–199, 2005.
- R. Renault and A. Trannoy. Assessing the extent of strategic manipulation: the average vote example. SERIEs, 2:497–513, 2011.
- E. M. Varloot and R. Laraki. Level-strategyproof belief aggregation mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 335–369, 2022.
- J. Wagner and R. Meir. Strategy-proof budgeting via a vcg-like mechanism. In Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Algorithmic Game Theory, pages 401–418, 2023.