Bio-SIEVE: Exploring Instruction Tuning Large Language Models for Systematic Review Automation (2308.06610v1)
Abstract: Medical systematic reviews can be very costly and resource intensive. We explore how LLMs can support and be trained to perform literature screening when provided with a detailed set of selection criteria. Specifically, we instruction tune LLaMA and Guanaco models to perform abstract screening for medical systematic reviews. Our best model, Bio-SIEVE, outperforms both ChatGPT and trained traditional approaches, and generalises better across medical domains. However, there remains the challenge of adapting the model to safety-first scenarios. We also explore the impact of multi-task training with Bio-SIEVE-Multi, including tasks such as PICO extraction and exclusion reasoning, but find that it is unable to match single-task Bio-SIEVE's performance. We see Bio-SIEVE as an important step towards specialising LLMs for the biomedical systematic review process and explore its future developmental opportunities. We release our models, code and a list of DOIs to reconstruct our dataset for reproducibility.
- Ambrose Robinson (3 papers)
- William Thorne (3 papers)
- Ben P. Wu (2 papers)
- Abdullah Pandor (1 paper)
- Munira Essat (1 paper)
- Mark Stevenson (30 papers)
- Xingyi Song (30 papers)