Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
60 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
8 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Self-regulating Prompts: Foundational Model Adaptation without Forgetting (2307.06948v2)

Published 13 Jul 2023 in cs.CV
Self-regulating Prompts: Foundational Model Adaptation without Forgetting

Abstract: Prompt learning has emerged as an efficient alternative for fine-tuning foundational models, such as CLIP, for various downstream tasks. Conventionally trained using the task-specific objective, i.e., cross-entropy loss, prompts tend to overfit downstream data distributions and find it challenging to capture task-agnostic general features from the frozen CLIP. This leads to the loss of the model's original generalization capability. To address this issue, our work introduces a self-regularization framework for prompting called PromptSRC (Prompting with Self-regulating Constraints). PromptSRC guides the prompts to optimize for both task-specific and task-agnostic general representations using a three-pronged approach by: (a) regulating prompted representations via mutual agreement maximization with the frozen model, (b) regulating with self-ensemble of prompts over the training trajectory to encode their complementary strengths, and (c) regulating with textual diversity to mitigate sample diversity imbalance with the visual branch. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first regularization framework for prompt learning that avoids overfitting by jointly attending to pre-trained model features, the training trajectory during prompting, and the textual diversity. PromptSRC explicitly steers the prompts to learn a representation space that maximizes performance on downstream tasks without compromising CLIP generalization. We perform extensive experiments on 4 benchmarks where PromptSRC overall performs favorably well compared to the existing methods. Our code and pre-trained models are publicly available at: https://github.com/muzairkhattak/PromptSRC.

Overview of "Self-regulating Prompts: Foundational Model Adaptation without Forgetting"

The paper "Self-regulating Prompts: Foundational Model Adaptation without Forgetting" dives into the domain of prompt learning, particularly focusing on adapting foundational vision-language (VL) models, such as CLIP, without compromising their inherent generalization capabilities. This research addresses a significant challenge in prompt learning where the conventional methods often lead to overfitting, thus diminishing the generalization prowess of the pre-trained models.

Key Contributions and Methodology

The central proposition of this paper is the development of the PromptSRC framework which introduces a self-regularization mechanism to optimize prompts. The researchers identify that existing methods primarily focus on task-specific objectives, which results in a narrowed feature space that overlooks the broader, generalized knowledge ingrained in models like CLIP. To mitigate this, the paper proposes a three-pronged self-regulation approach:

  1. Mutual Agreement Maximization: This aspect introduces a constraint that aligns the generated prompted features with their frozen counterparts in the model. Through the use of consistency losses, both at the feature and logit levels, this component ensures that the learning trajectory of prompts remains close to the original generalized feature space inherent to CLIP.
  2. Self-ensembling of Prompts: Addressing the variance in prompt efficacy at different training stages, this component aggregates prompts using a Gaussian weighted mechanism throughout the training timeline. By selectively emphasizing prompts from middle epochs and incorporating knowledge from various training stages, the approach stabilizes prompt learning outcomes.
  3. Textual Diversity Utilization: Acknowledging the disparity in sample diversity between visual inputs and text labels, this strategy enhances the prompts' exposure to diverse text representations. By leveraging multiple text augmentations during training, it ensures a balanced and enriched input repertoire, thus promoting the acquisition of more generalized task representations.

Empirical Evaluation

Extensive experimentation is conducted across four benchmarks: base-to-novel class generalization, few-shot learning, domain generalization, and cross-dataset evaluation. PromptSRC consistently enhances the performance across these benchmarks, especially notable in the few-shot learning scenario where it significantly outperforms existing approaches in scenarios with limited data availability. The framework also demonstrates superior capacity in maintaining, and even enhancing, generalization on novel tasks when compared to baseline and other state-of-the-art prompt learning models.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of this research are manifold. Practically, it enhances the versatility of pre-trained models like CLIP to transfer learning applications across diverse downstream tasks without extensive re-training while preserving their broad-spectrum utility. Theoretically, it sets a precedent in enforcing regularization within prompt learning through self-regulatory constraints. Future explorations could delve into the scalability of these self-regulating techniques across newer foundational models with more complex architectures and further investigate dynamic prompt adaptation strategies that incorporate real-time feedback.

Conclusion

"Self-regulating Prompts: Foundational Model Adaptation without Forgetting" significantly advances the prompt learning landscape by providing a robust framework that remedies the overfitting issue prevalent in adaptation tasks. By introducing novel self-regulation components, it both preserves and extends the generalization strengths of foundational models, offering a balanced paradigm for future research endeavors in the field of model adaptation and transfer learning.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Muhammad Uzair Khattak (10 papers)
  2. Syed Talal Wasim (11 papers)
  3. Muzammal Naseer (67 papers)
  4. Salman Khan (244 papers)
  5. Ming-Hsuan Yang (376 papers)
  6. Fahad Shahbaz Khan (225 papers)
Citations (104)